Abstract
S ummary Inoculations with N. galligena on unwounded shoots of apple show that canker infections through leaf scars may be initiated in October and April but not in November and January. Shoots sprayed before inoculation with a Bordeaux‐casein‐oil mixture gave a much lower proportion of infection than those unsprayed. Inoculations with N. galligena on pruning cuts showed that freshly made pruning cuts on apple shoots are susceptible to canker infection throughout the dormant season. Pruning cuts made during autumn and winter acquire a natural immunity to infection within 2 months. Several wound sealing materials applied to pruning cuts failed to give protection from canker when the treated surfaces were inoculated with N. galligena. The most promising wound protectant tested was a mixture of monohydrated copper sulphate, hydrated lime and linseed oil.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
N. galligena initiated apple canker through leaf scars in October and April, but not November or January.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticae0 - Organ / stage
- leaf scarse0
- Interactor
- N. galligenae0pathogen
- Outcome
- canker infections through leaf scarse0
- Qualifier
- October and April but not in November and Januarye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Inoculations with N. galligena on unwounded shoots of apple show that canker infections through leaf scars may be initiated in October and April but not in November and January”
Claim · model-written summary
Bordeaux casein oil spray before inoculation lowered apple shoot infection relative to unsprayed shoots.
- Taxon
- appleMalus domesticat0
- Treatment
- Bordeaux‐casein‐oil mixturee0
- Outcome
- proportion of infectione0
- Direction
- much lowere0
- Comparator
- those unsprayede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Shoots sprayed before inoculation with a Bordeaux‐casein‐oil mixture gave a much lower proportion of infection than those unsprayed”
t0“APPLE”
Claim · model-written summary
Fresh apple shoot pruning cuts were susceptible to canker throughout the dormant season.
- Taxon
- appleMalus domesticae0
- Organ / stage
- pruning cutse0
- Outcome
- susceptible to canker infectione0
- Qualifier
- throughout the dormant seasone0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“freshly made pruning cuts on apple shoots are susceptible to canker infection throughout the dormant season”
Claim · model-written summary
Autumn and winter apple pruning cuts acquired natural immunity within two months.
- Taxon
- appleMalus domesticat0
- Organ / stage
- Pruning cutse0
- Outcome
- natural immunity to infectione0
- Value
- 2 monthse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Pruning cuts made during autumn and winter acquire a natural immunity to infection within 2 months”
t0“APPLE”
Claim · model-written summary
Several wound sealants failed to protect inoculated apple pruning cuts from canker.
- Taxon
- appleMalus domesticat0
- Treatment
- wound sealing materialse0
- Interactor
- N. galligenae0pathogen
- Outcome
- protection from cankere0
- Direction
- failede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Several wound sealing materials applied to pruning cuts failed to give protection from canker when the treated surfaces were inoculated with N. galligena”
t0“APPLE”
Claim · model-written summary
A copper sulphate, lime and linseed oil mixture was the most promising apple wound protectant tested.
- Taxon
- appleMalus domesticat0
- Treatment
- mixture of monohydrated copper sulphate, hydrated lime and linseed oile0
- Outcome
- most promising wound protectante0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The most promising wound protectant tested was a mixture of monohydrated copper sulphate, hydrated lime and linseed oil”
t0“APPLE”
The same questions in other papers
mechanical · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- no effect
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.