Paper · 2011

EFFECTS OF TWO SYSTEMIC INSECTICIDES ON DAMPING-OFF PATHOGENS OF COTTON

M Houshyiar Fard; Taqi Darvish Mojeni

5
claims
12
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In vitro and greenhouse studies were conducted to investigate the possibility of an interaction between two systemic insecticides of: Thiodicarb (Larvin DF 80) and Imidacloprid (Guacho SW 70), and seedling disease organisms of: Rhizoctonia solani, Fusarium moniliforme and Pythium ultimum. When in vitro concentrations of Imidacloprid and Thiodicarb were applied, a fungistatic activity occurred. These insecticides inhibited mycelial growth of R. solani and F. moniliforme by 6.6-14.1 % and 15.2-70.8 %, respectively. F. moniliforme was more seriously affected by the insecticides while no significant effect was observed on P. ultimum. The pot experiments confirmed in vitro results so that, Thiodicarb provided excellent protection against pre- and postemergence damping-off of the plant by 54.2% and 90.6 %, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiodicarb gave excellent protection of cotton against pre-emergence damping-off, by 54.2%.

Treatment
Thiodicarbe1
Outcome
pre- and postemergence damping-offe1
Direction
decreaseinferrede1
Value
54.2%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PATHOGENS OF COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–71 · show in text ↑
e1

“Thiodicarb provided excellent protection against pre- and postemergence damping-off of the plant by 54.2% and 90.6 %, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–824 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiodicarb gave excellent protection of cotton against post-emergence damping-off, by 90.6%.

Treatment
Thiodicarbe1
Outcome
pre- and postemergence damping-offe1
Direction
decreaseinferrede1
Value
90.6 %e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PATHOGENS OF COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–71 · show in text ↑
e1

“Thiodicarb provided excellent protection against pre- and postemergence damping-off of the plant by 54.2% and 90.6 %, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–824 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid and Thiodicarb inhibited mycelial growth of Rhizoctonia solani by 6.6-14.1% in vitro.

Treatment
Imidacloprid and Thiodicarbe2
Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie3pathogen
Outcome
mycelial growthe3
Direction
inhibitede3
Value
6.6-14.1 %e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PATHOGENS OF COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–71 · show in text ↑
e2

“When in vitro concentrations of Imidacloprid and Thiodicarb were applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–362 · show in text ↑
e3

“These insecticides inhibited mycelial growth of R. solani and F. moniliforme by 6.6-14.1 % and 15.2-70.8 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–503 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid and Thiodicarb inhibited mycelial growth of Fusarium moniliforme by 15.2-70.8% in vitro.

Treatment
Imidacloprid and Thiodicarbe2
Interactor
F. moniliformeFusarium verticillioidese3pathogen
Outcome
mycelial growthe3
Direction
inhibitede3
Value
15.2-70.8 %e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium verticillioides
Fusarium verticillioides · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PATHOGENS OF COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–71 · show in text ↑
e2

“When in vitro concentrations of Imidacloprid and Thiodicarb were applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–362 · show in text ↑
e3

“These insecticides inhibited mycelial growth of R. solani and F. moniliforme by 6.6-14.1 % and 15.2-70.8 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–503 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The insecticides had no significant effect on Pythium ultimum.

Treatment
insecticidese5
Interactor
P. ultimumGlobisporangium ultimume5pathogen
Outcome
effecte5
Direction
no_changeinferrede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PATHOGENS OF COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–71 · show in text ↑
e5

“F. moniliforme was more seriously affected by the insecticides while no significant effect was observed on P. ultimum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 519–636 · show in text ↑

imidacloprid · Fusarium verticillioides · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

imidacloprid · Rhizoctonia solani · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.