Paper · 1990 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

No-tillage and dry ploughing compared with puddling for wet-season rice on an alluvial sandy clay–loam in eastern India

K. R. Mahata; H. S. Sen; S. K. Pradhan; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
10
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY No-tillage and dry ploughing were compared with puddling under identical cultivation conditions for their effect on growth and yield of wet-season rice. The experiment was conducted on an alluvial sandy clay–loam soil over 5 years (1978–82) at Cuttack, India. In the preceding dry season, each plot was split into two halves for growing dry-season crops, with and without tillage. Growth of rice seedlings without applying N to the seed bed was faster and more vigorous after puddling, as shown by greater shoot and root weight per hill and a higher shoot:root ratio, and remained so until maturity. This was reflected in earlier flowering and maturity, followed by greater grain and straw yields. These results are attributed to the ability of the roots to obtain more N from the puddled soil. Under high water table conditions, extractable and soluble N in the root zone were not much influenced by tillage treatments. Grain and straw yields after no-tillage were similar to those produced by dry ploughing but smaller than those produced by puddling, although the differences were not significant in some years. Soil strength measured at the end of the rice-growing season in 1980 and 1981 was significantly greater after continuous no-tillage. The decreasing trend in grain and straw yield and number of panicle-bearing tillers/m 2 from 1980 onwards after continuous no-tillage, was associated with increasing soil strength. The results suggest that, where percolation losses of water and nutrients are small, puddling, which is capital intensive and detrimental to soil structure, could be replaced by notillage accompanied by suitable N and weed management. However, continuous no-tillage is not recommended for a soil with a lower clay content because the soil will gradually harden with time.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Puddling increased seedling shoot and root weight and shoot:root ratio relative to other tillage methods.

Treatment
puddlinge0
Outcome
shoot and root weight per hill and a higher shoot:root ratioe0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
without applying N to the seed bede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth of rice seedlings without applying N to the seed bed was faster and more vigorous after puddling, as shown by greater shoot and root weight per hill and a higher shoot:root ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 389–574 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Puddling led to earlier flowering and maturity.

Treatment
puddlingt0
Outcome
flowering and maturitye0
Direction
earliere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This was reflected in earlier flowering and maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–660 · show in text ↑
t0

“puddling for wet-season rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Puddling produced greater grain and straw yields.

Treatment
puddlingt0
Outcome
grain and straw yieldse0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by greater grain and straw yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–704 · show in text ↑
t0

“puddling for wet-season rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under high water table conditions, tillage had little influence on extractable and soluble root-zone N.

Treatment
tillage treatmentse0
Outcome
extractable and soluble N in the root zonee0
Direction
not much influencede0
Qualifier
high water table conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under high water table conditions, extractable and soluble N in the root zone were not much influenced by tillage treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–927 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-tillage and dry ploughing gave similar grain and straw yields.

Treatment
no-tillagee0
Outcome
Grain and straw yieldse0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
dry ploughinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain and straw yields after no-tillage were similar to those produced by dry ploughing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1016 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-tillage gave smaller grain and straw yields than puddling, with nonsignificant differences in some years.

Treatment
no-tillagee0
Outcome
Grain and straw yieldse0
Direction
smallere0
Qualifier
not significant in some yearse0
Comparator
puddlinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain and straw yields after no-tillage were similar to those produced by dry ploughing but smaller than those produced by puddling, although the differences were not significant in some years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1121 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous no-tillage significantly increased soil strength.

Treatment
continuous no-tillagee0
Outcome
Soil strengthe0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
at the end of the rice-growing season in 1980 and 1981e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil strength measured at the end of the rice-growing season in 1980 and 1981 was significantly greater after continuous no-tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1254 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–71 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Declining grain and straw yield and panicle-bearing tiller number under continuous no-tillage were associated with increasing soil strength.

Treatment
continuous no-tillagee0
Outcome
grain and straw yield and number of panicle-bearing tillers/m 2e0
Direction
decreasinge0
Qualifier
increasing soil strengthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The decreasing trend in grain and straw yield and number of panicle-bearing tillers/m 2 from 1980 onwards after continuous no-tillage, was associated with increasing soil strength”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1435 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–71 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest replacing puddling with no-tillage plus suitable N and weed management where percolation losses are small.

Outcome
puddling, which is capital intensive and detrimental to soil structure, could be replaced by notillage accompanied by suitable N and weed managemente0
Qualifier
where percolation losses of water and nutrients are smalle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“where percolation losses of water and nutrients are small, puddling, which is capital intensive and detrimental to soil structure, could be replaced by notillage accompanied by suitable N and weed management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1463–1670 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–71 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous no-tillage is not recommended on lower-clay soils because they harden over time.

Outcome
continuous no-tillage is not recommendede0
Qualifier
a soil with a lower clay contente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“continuous no-tillage is not recommended for a soil with a lower clay content because the soil will gradually harden with time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1681–1807 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–71 · show in text ↑

tillage · phenology · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

tillage · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

149 papers: 116 positive, 33 negative or no effect

115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

145 papers more in this group

See all 149 papers →

tillage · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

729 papers: 587 positive, 142 negative or no effect

586 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 27 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

725 papers more in this group

See all 729 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.