Paper · 2004 · Lanzhou University Institutional Repository

Integrated dryland weed control in nature farming systems

Hui-lian Xu; Feifei Qin; Fahong Wang; et al.

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

As practices of integrated weed control in nature farming systems, surface application of a bioactive organic fertilizer, pigtailed wheat straw mulch, and intercropped peanut as a smother crop were tested with soybean, Japanese pumpkin and tomato, respectively. A bioactive organic fertilizer using rice bran, oil mill sludge and fish meal as materials and a microbial inoculant (EM as its commercial name) as fermentation starter, was applied into the 3-cm surface soil layer, where the bio-fertilizer was aerobically re-fermented and seeds of weeds were damaged during germination by the fermenting process. Weed population decreased more than 50% by applying the bioactive organic fertilizer on soil surface. In the second experiment, residues of winter wheat were brailed on soil surface in pigtail style as mulch after the ears were harvested. This kind of residue mulching depressed weeds significantly, increased soil microbial quantity and activity, avoided powdery mildew and increased pumpkin fruit yield. In the third experiment, as a cover crop, peanut intercropped into tomato crop smothered weeds, decreased tomato leaf blight infection and increased tomato fruit yield more than 10% in addition to the peanut harvest. It is concluded that above mentioned three methods can be adopted in integrated weed management in organic or nature farming systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying the bioactive organic fertilizer on the soil surface decreased weed population by more than 50% in soybean.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
applying the bioactive organic fertilizer on soil surfacee1
Interactor
Weede1weed
Outcome
Weed populatione1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
more than 50%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“were tested with soybean, Japanese pumpkin and tomato, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–260 · show in text ↑
e1

“Weed population decreased more than 50% by applying the bioactive organic fertilizer on soil surface”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–710 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Residue mulching significantly depressed weeds in Japanese pumpkin.

Taxon
Japanese pumpkine0
Treatment
residue mulchinge2
Interactor
weedse2weed
Outcome
weedse2
Direction
depressede2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“were tested with soybean, Japanese pumpkin and tomato, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–260 · show in text ↑
e2

“This kind of residue mulching depressed weeds significantly, increased soil microbial quantity and activity, avoided powdery mildew and increased pumpkin fruit yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–1014 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residue mulching increased soil microbial quantity and activity in the Japanese pumpkin field.

Taxon
Japanese pumpkine0
Treatment
residue mulchinge2
Outcome
soil microbial quantity and activitye2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“were tested with soybean, Japanese pumpkin and tomato, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–260 · show in text ↑
e2

“This kind of residue mulching depressed weeds significantly, increased soil microbial quantity and activity, avoided powdery mildew and increased pumpkin fruit yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–1014 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residue mulching avoided powdery mildew in Japanese pumpkin.

Taxon
Japanese pumpkine0
Treatment
residue mulchinge2
Interactor
powdery mildewe2pathogen
Outcome
powdery mildewe2
Direction
avoidede2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“were tested with soybean, Japanese pumpkin and tomato, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–260 · show in text ↑
e2

“This kind of residue mulching depressed weeds significantly, increased soil microbial quantity and activity, avoided powdery mildew and increased pumpkin fruit yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–1014 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residue mulching increased Japanese pumpkin fruit yield.

Taxon
Japanese pumpkine0
Treatment
residue mulchinge2
Outcome
pumpkin fruit yielde2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“were tested with soybean, Japanese pumpkin and tomato, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–260 · show in text ↑
e2

“This kind of residue mulching depressed weeds significantly, increased soil microbial quantity and activity, avoided powdery mildew and increased pumpkin fruit yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–1014 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peanut intercropped into tomato smothered weeds.

Treatment
peanut intercropped into tomato crope3
Interactor
weedse3weed
Outcome
weedse3
Direction
smotherede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“were tested with soybean, Japanese pumpkin and tomato, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–260 · show in text ↑
e3

“peanut intercropped into tomato crop smothered weeds, decreased tomato leaf blight infection and increased tomato fruit yield more than 10% in addition to the peanut harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1231 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peanut intercropped into tomato decreased tomato leaf blight infection.

Treatment
peanut intercropped into tomato crope3
Outcome
leaf blight infectione3
Direction
decreasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“peanut intercropped into tomato crop smothered weeds, decreased tomato leaf blight infection and increased tomato fruit yield more than 10% in addition to the peanut harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1231 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peanut intercropped into tomato increased tomato fruit yield by more than 10%.

Treatment
peanut intercropped into tomato crope3
Outcome
tomato fruit yielde3
Direction
increasede3
Value
more than 10%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“peanut intercropped into tomato crop smothered weeds, decreased tomato leaf blight infection and increased tomato fruit yield more than 10% in addition to the peanut harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1231 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The three tested methods can be adopted in integrated weed management in organic or nature farming.

Taxon
soybean, Japanese pumpkin and tomatoe0
Outcome
integrated weed managemente4

Verbatim

e0

“were tested with soybean, Japanese pumpkin and tomato, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–260 · show in text ↑
e4

“It is concluded that above mentioned three methods can be adopted in integrated weed management in organic or nature farming systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1365 · show in text ↑

Arachis hypogaea · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Arachis hypogaea · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

intercropping · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 11 positive, 3 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

fertilization · weed · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 11 positive, 5 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

intercropping · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 41 positive, 5 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.