Paper · 2012 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Effects of Priming by Salicylic Acid on Yield and Growth Indices of Safflower (Carthamus tinctorus L.) Plants Under end Season Drought Stress

R Baljain; F Shekari

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Salicylic acid is a plant hormone which had enhancing effects on growth and yield of plants under different environmental conditions. It is proposed, salicylic acid could be used as growth regulator for improving plant growth under water stress conditions. The effects of salicylic acid on yield and growth indices on safflower plants was investigated in a split, split plot in complete randomized block design. Water stress in two levels, normal irrigation and cut off irrigation after flowering, as main plot, safflower genotypes in four levels, including Isfehan Local, Gilla, Lesaf and Dincer, as sub plots and priming in five levels, including 0, 700, 1400, 2100 and 2800 µM salicylic acid as sub, sub plot were studied. Results showed that plants in normal conditions had highest leaf area index (LAI), leaf area duration (LAD), net assimilation rate (NAR), seed yield and seed and oil harvest index compared to plants in stress conditions. Water stress leads to rapid decrease in leaf area and decrease of greenness period. Among the genotypes, Dincer and follow it, Lesaf in both irrigated and stress conditions had highest LAI, specific leaf weight, LAD, NAR, seed yield and seed and oil harvest index. Also, Dicer had lowest leaf area ratio (LAR). By contrast, Gilla had highest LAR and lowest seed yield. In irrigated plots, plants which primed with 2800 µM salicylic acid had highest seed yield and growth indices. On the other hand, under stress condition treated plants with 1400 µM salicylic acid had better performance. It is possible in higher priming levels, plants had more leaf area and because of higher transpiration and rapid loss of storage soil water, they had not enough moisture in grain filling period. Therefore, treatments with lower leaf area had better performance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Normal irrigation gave the highest leaf area index, leaf area duration and net assimilation rate compared with stress.

Treatment
normal conditionse0
Outcome
leaf area index (LAI), leaf area duration (LAD), net assimilation rate (NAR)e0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
stress conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plants in normal conditions had highest leaf area index (LAI), leaf area duration (LAD), net assimilation rate (NAR), seed yield and seed and oil harvest index compared to plants in stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–945 · show in text ↑
t0

“Safflower (Carthamus tinctorus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Normal irrigation gave the highest seed yield and harvest indices compared with stress.

Treatment
normal conditionse0
Outcome
seed yield and seed and oil harvest indexe0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
stress conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plants in normal conditions had highest leaf area index (LAI), leaf area duration (LAD), net assimilation rate (NAR), seed yield and seed and oil harvest index compared to plants in stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–945 · show in text ↑
t0

“Safflower (Carthamus tinctorus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress rapidly reduced leaf area and the greenness period.

Treatment
Water stresse0
Outcome
leaf area and decrease of greenness periode0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water stress leads to rapid decrease in leaf area and decrease of greenness period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1029 · show in text ↑
t0

“Safflower (Carthamus tinctorus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–102 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dincer had the highest LAI, specific leaf weight, LAD and NAR across irrigation conditions, followed by Lesaf.

Material
Dincere0
Outcome
LAI, specific leaf weight, LAD, NARe0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
both irrigated and stress conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dincer and follow it, Lesaf in both irrigated and stress conditions had highest LAI, specific leaf weight, LAD, NAR, seed yield and seed and oil harvest index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1210 · show in text ↑
t0

“Safflower (Carthamus tinctorus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–102 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dincer had the highest seed yield and harvest indices across irrigation conditions, followed by Lesaf.

Material
Dincere0
Outcome
seed yield and seed and oil harvest indexe0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
both irrigated and stress conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dincer and follow it, Lesaf in both irrigated and stress conditions had highest LAI, specific leaf weight, LAD, NAR, seed yield and seed and oil harvest index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1210 · show in text ↑
t0

“Safflower (Carthamus tinctorus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–102 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dincer had the lowest leaf area ratio.

Material
Dicere0
Outcome
leaf area ratio (LAR)e0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dicer had lowest leaf area ratio (LAR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1256 · show in text ↑
t0

“Safflower (Carthamus tinctorus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–102 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gilla had the highest leaf area ratio.

Material
Gillae0
Outcome
LARe0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gilla had highest LAR and lowest seed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1314 · show in text ↑
t0

“Safflower (Carthamus tinctorus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–102 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gilla had the lowest seed yield.

Material
Gillae0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gilla had highest LAR and lowest seed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1314 · show in text ↑
t0

“Safflower (Carthamus tinctorus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under irrigation, 2800 µM salicylic acid priming gave the highest seed yield and growth indices.

Treatment
2800 µM salicylic acide0
Outcome
seed yield and growth indicese0
Direction
higheste0
Setting
irrigated plotse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In irrigated plots, plants which primed with 2800 µM salicylic acid had highest seed yield and growth indices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1425 · show in text ↑
t0

“Safflower (Carthamus tinctorus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under stress, 1400 µM salicylic acid priming produced better performance.

Treatment
1400 µM salicylic acide0
Outcome
better performancee0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
under stress conditione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under stress condition treated plants with 1400 µM salicylic acid had better performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1446–1534 · show in text ↑
t0

“Safflower (Carthamus tinctorus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–102 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower leaf area treatments performed better, possibly because greater leaf area depleted stored soil water during grain filling.

Outcome
better performancee0
Qualifier
higher transpiration and rapid loss of storage soil watere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It is possible in higher priming levels, plants had more leaf area and because of higher transpiration and rapid loss of storage soil water, they had not enough moisture in grain filling period. Therefore, treatments with lower leaf area had better performance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1536–1797 · show in text ↑
t0

“Safflower (Carthamus tinctorus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–102 · show in text ↑

salicylic acid · yield · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

drought · physiology: pigments · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 2 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.