Paper · 2013

In vitro selection of sheath blight resistance germplams in rice

Xiao-Xing Liang; Ping Li; Zheng AiPing

7
claims
19
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An effective rice callus screening method for breeding disease-resistant regenerated plants of sheath blight caused by Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn is yet to be developed. In this study, callus-resistant rice was screened using pathogenic crude toxins of highly virulent isolates, R. solani (Anastomosis Group 1-IA) collected from Sichuan Province, China. Highly susceptible rice cultivars, Lemont and moderate resistant rice cultivar, Kasalath were used for callus screening. The detached leaf and micro-chamber methods were used to evaluate the resistance of the regenerated plants (R0) and their offspring (R1). The disease resistance levels of R0 and R1 obviously improved when compared with the control (P>0.05). Rice seedlings were inoculated with 0.25 g of R. solani mycelium (fresh weight) at the base of the plant and then covered with transparent plastic bottles to maintain high humidity after inoculation. The resistance of R1 was enhanced than their progenitors, the disease index of R1 of Kasalath was 2.27 which was higher than that of IR64, 9311, TeQing and Gan72, while the disease index of R1 of Lemont was 3.14 which was higher than that of 9311, TeQing and Gan72. According to the nine-grade disease classification, the R1 of Lemont was moderately resistant, while the R1 of Kasalath was resistant.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sheath blight resistance of regenerated R0 rice plants improved relative to controls, although P was greater than 0.05.

Treatment
pathogenic crude toxinse0
Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
disease resistance levels of R0e1
Direction
improvede1
Comparator
the controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“callus-resistant rice was screened using pathogenic crude toxins of highly virulent isolates, R. solani (Anastomosis Group 1-IA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–310 · show in text ↑
e1

“The disease resistance levels of R0 and R1 obviously improved when compared with the control (P>0.05).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–712 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sheath blight resistance of R1 rice offspring improved relative to controls, although P was greater than 0.05.

Treatment
pathogenic crude toxinse0
Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
disease resistance levels of R0 and R1e1
Direction
improvede1
Comparator
the controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“callus-resistant rice was screened using pathogenic crude toxins of highly virulent isolates, R. solani (Anastomosis Group 1-IA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–310 · show in text ↑
e1

“The disease resistance levels of R0 and R1 obviously improved when compared with the control (P>0.05).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–712 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

R1 Kasalath resistance was reported as enhanced relative to its progenitor.

Material
Kasalathe0
Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie2pathogen
Outcome
resistance of R1e0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
their progenitorse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The resistance of R1 was enhanced than their progenitors, the disease index of R1 of Kasalath was 2.27”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1015 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice cultivar, Kasalath”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–439 · show in text ↑
e2

“R. solani mycelium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–777 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

R1 Kasalath had a disease index of 2.27, reported as higher than IR64, 9311, TeQing and Gan72.

Material
Kasalathe0
Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie2pathogen
Outcome
disease index of R1e0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.27e0
Comparator
IR64, 9311, TeQing and Gan72e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the disease index of R1 of Kasalath was 2.27 which was higher than that of IR64, 9311, TeQing and Gan72”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1074 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice cultivar, Kasalath”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–439 · show in text ↑
e2

“R. solani mycelium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–777 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

R1 Lemont had a disease index of 3.14, reported as higher than 9311, TeQing and Gan72.

Material
Lemonte0
Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie2pathogen
Outcome
disease index of R1e0
Direction
highere0
Value
3.14e0
Comparator
9311, TeQing and Gan72e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the disease index of R1 of Lemont was 3.14 which was higher than that of 9311, TeQing and Gan72”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1177 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice cultivars, Lemont”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–392 · show in text ↑
e2

“R. solani mycelium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–777 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

R1 Lemont was classified as moderately resistant.

Material
Lemonte0
Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie2pathogen
Outcome
moderately resistante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the R1 of Lemont was moderately resistant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1272 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice cultivars, Lemont”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–392 · show in text ↑
e2

“R. solani mycelium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–777 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

R1 Kasalath was classified as resistant.

Material
Kasalathe0
Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie2pathogen
Outcome
resistante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the R1 of Kasalath was resistant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1312 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice cultivar, Kasalath”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–439 · show in text ↑
e2

“R. solani mycelium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–777 · show in text ↑

pathogen product · Rhizoctonia solani · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.