Paper · 2001 · Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection

Reaction of tomato cultivars to the root‐knot nematode,Meloidogyne incognitain presence of lead

Ghazala Parveen; M. Mashkoor Alam

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

All the cultivars of tomato tested were found to be infected with the root‐knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita, however, to varying extent. There was also reducton in plant growth parameters accordingly. Further reduction in plant growth of tomato cultivars was recorded when plants also received the treatment with the heavy metal, lead, notwithstanding the fact that the presence of lead also reduced the root‐knot development. Tomato cv. Arka Vikas showed minimum reduction in plant growth with single or combined treatment with the nematode and the heavy metal.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All tested tomato cultivars were infected with Meloidogyne incognita, to varying extent.

Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
infectede0
Qualifier
to varying extente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the cultivars of tomato tested were found to be infected with the root‐knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita, however, to varying extent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematode infection reduced plant growth parameters of tomato cultivars accordingly.

Treatment
root‐knot nematodee2
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae2pathogen
Outcome
plant growth parameterse1
Direction
reductone1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cultivars of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–27 · show in text ↑
e1

“There was also reducton in plant growth parameters accordingly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–203 · show in text ↑
e2

“root‐knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 70–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato plant growth was reduced further when plants also received lead treatment.

Treatment
treatment with the heavy metal, leade1
Outcome
plant growthe1
Direction
Further reductione1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cultivars of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–27 · show in text ↑
e1

“Further reduction in plant growth of tomato cultivars was recorded when plants also received the treatment with the heavy metal, lead”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 205–338 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The presence of lead also reduced root-knot development.

Treatment
presence of leade1
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae2pathogen
Outcome
root‐knot developmente1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cultivars of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–27 · show in text ↑
e1

“the presence of lead also reduced the root‐knot development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–429 · show in text ↑
e2

“root‐knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 70–111 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato cv. Arka Vikas showed the minimum reduction in plant growth under single or combined nematode and lead treatment.

Material
Arka Vikase0
Treatment
single or combined treatment with the nematode and the heavy metale0
Outcome
minimum reduction in plant growthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato cv. Arka Vikas showed minimum reduction in plant growth with single or combined treatment with the nematode and the heavy metal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–565 · show in text ↑

Meloidogyne javanica · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

lead atom · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 1 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

heavy metal · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 2 positive, 24 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.