Abstract
Intensive cropping has resulted-in wide spread deficiency of nutrients in most of the soils and situation is becoming more serious because of a increase in the use of high priced chemical fertilizers and their negative influence on the environment. Exploitation of biological intervention mainly phosphate solublizing bacteria (PSB) has attracted great attention, as they have enormous potential in providing soil phosphorus for plant growth, by increasing the availability of accumulated phosphate through solubilization. A field experiment was conducted to investigate the effect of Rhizobium and Bacillus, alone and in combination on the yield parameters of wheat. Uniform dose of N and K (160 and 60 kg ha), while two levels of P (57 and 114 kg ha) were applied as Urea, SOP and SSP, respectively. Bacillus and Rhizobium were applied as seed coating to wheat (Var. Sehar 2006).Results revealed that number of tillers (370.3 m), spike length (13.50 cm), number of grains (46 spike), grain yield (6171 kg ha), biomass (17.00 t ha), grain protein (11.84%) and 1000 grain weight (62 g) were higher in co-inoculation of Rhizobium and Bacillus. It was also recorded that coinoculation of Rhizobium and Bacillus improved the grain yield up to 17.5% as compared to control. In single inoculation Bacillus gave better result and showed an increase of 7.7% in grain yield. Phosphorus uptake by grains (25.29 kg ha) was maximized by co-inoculation followed by Bacillus inoculation. Available phosphorus in post harvest sample of soil was recorded (16.27 mg kg) which was significantly higher than all other treatments. Results clearly demonstrated that co-inoculation of Rhizobium and Bacillus sp enhanced the availability of phosphorus and exert positive effect on the growth and yield of crop.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Co-inoculation gave higher tiller number of 370.3 m.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- co-inoculation of Rhizobium and Bacilluse0
- Outcome
- number of tillerse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 370.3 me0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“number of tillers (370.3 m), spike length (13.50 cm), number of grains (46 spike), grain yield (6171 kg ha), biomass (17.00 t ha), grain protein (11.84%) and 1000 grain weight (62 g) were higher in co-inoculation of Rhizobium and Bacillus”
t0“wheat”
t1“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Co-inoculation gave higher spike length of 13.50 cm.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- co-inoculation of Rhizobium and Bacilluse0
- Outcome
- spike lengthe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 13.50 cme0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“spike length (13.50 cm), number of grains (46 spike), grain yield (6171 kg ha), biomass (17.00 t ha), grain protein (11.84%) and 1000 grain weight (62 g) were higher in co-inoculation of Rhizobium and Bacillus”
t0“wheat”
t1“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Co-inoculation gave higher grains per spike of 46.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- co-inoculation of Rhizobium and Bacilluse0
- Outcome
- number of grainse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 46 spikee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“number of grains (46 spike), grain yield (6171 kg ha), biomass (17.00 t ha), grain protein (11.84%) and 1000 grain weight (62 g) were higher in co-inoculation of Rhizobium and Bacillus”
t0“wheat”
t1“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Co-inoculation gave higher grain yield of 6171 kg ha.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- co-inoculation of Rhizobium and Bacilluse0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 6171 kg hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“grain yield (6171 kg ha), biomass (17.00 t ha), grain protein (11.84%) and 1000 grain weight (62 g) were higher in co-inoculation of Rhizobium and Bacillus”
t0“wheat”
t1“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Co-inoculation gave higher biomass of 17.00 t ha.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- co-inoculation of Rhizobium and Bacilluse0
- Outcome
- biomasse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 17.00 t hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“biomass (17.00 t ha), grain protein (11.84%) and 1000 grain weight (62 g) were higher in co-inoculation of Rhizobium and Bacillus”
t0“wheat”
t1“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Co-inoculation gave higher grain protein of 11.84%.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- co-inoculation of Rhizobium and Bacilluse0
- Outcome
- grain proteine0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 11.84%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“grain protein (11.84%) and 1000 grain weight (62 g) were higher in co-inoculation of Rhizobium and Bacillus”
t0“wheat”
t1“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Co-inoculation gave higher thousand grain weight of 62 g.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- co-inoculation of Rhizobium and Bacilluse0
- Outcome
- 1000 grain weighte0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 62 ge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“1000 grain weight (62 g) were higher in co-inoculation of Rhizobium and Bacillus”
t0“wheat”
t1“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Co-inoculation improved grain yield by up to 17.5% versus control.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- coinoculation of Rhizobium and Bacilluse0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Value
- 17.5%e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“coinoculation of Rhizobium and Bacillus improved the grain yield up to 17.5% as compared to control”
t0“wheat”
t1“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Bacillus alone increased grain yield by 7.7%.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- single inoculation Bacilluse0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 7.7%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In single inoculation Bacillus gave better result and showed an increase of 7.7% in grain yield.”
t0“wheat”
t1“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Co-inoculation maximized grain phosphorus uptake at 25.29 kg ha.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- co-inoculatione0
- Outcome
- Phosphorus uptake by grainse0
- Direction
- maximizede0
- Value
- 25.29 kg hae0
- Comparator
- Bacillus inoculatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Phosphorus uptake by grains (25.29 kg ha) was maximized by co-inoculation followed by Bacillus inoculation.”
t0“wheat”
t1“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Postharvest soil available phosphorus was 16.27 mg kg, significantly higher than other treatments.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- co-inoculatione1
- Outcome
- Available phosphorus in post harvest sample of soile0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 16.27 mg kge0
- Comparator
- all other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Available phosphorus in post harvest sample of soil was recorded (16.27 mg kg) which was significantly higher than all other treatments.”
e1“Phosphorus uptake by grains (25.29 kg ha) was maximized by co-inoculation followed by Bacillus inoculation.”
t0“wheat”
t1“wheat”
The same questions in other papers
Rhizobium · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- negative
Rhizobium · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →Rhizobium · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
inoculation · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- no effect
61 papers more in this group
See all 65 papers →inoculation · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
262 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
273 papers more in this group
See all 277 papers →inoculation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
475 papers in the same direction as this paper · 55 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
528 papers more in this group
See all 532 papers →inoculation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
548 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
610 papers more in this group
See all 614 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.