Abstract
Six crops of autumnsown wheat managed under integrated pest management (IPM) were compared to six adjacent crops grown under the participating farmers current pest management practices in demonstration trials in Canterbury during the 200809 and 200910 seasons Farmer training with a focus on monitoring and beneficial predator identification was carried out The presence and abundance of key pests and diseases (slugs aphids yellow dwarf virus (YDV)) and beneficial predators was determined Carabid beetles and other beneficial insects capable of contributing to pest control were present in the arable cropping systems There was an increasing trend in the number of beneficial organisms a reduction in pests and a 50 reduction in the number of insecticides applied in the IPM managed crops There were negligible YDV and crop yield differences between the two approaches IPM adoption at these farms was very high after these participatory trials
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Carabid beetles and other beneficial insects were present in the cropping systems.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Interactor
- Carabid beetlese0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- Carabid beetles and other beneficial insects capable of contributing to pest control were presente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Carabid beetles and other beneficial insects capable of contributing to pest control were present in the arable cropping systems”
t0“autumnsown wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Beneficial organisms increased under IPM.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- IPM managed cropse0
- Outcome
- number of beneficial organismse0
- Direction
- increasinge0
- Comparator
- participating farmers current pest management practicese1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“an increasing trend in the number of beneficial organisms a reduction in pests and a 50 reduction in the number of insecticides applied in the IPM managed crops”
e1“compared to six adjacent crops grown under the participating farmers current pest management practices”
t0“autumnsown wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Pests declined under IPM.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- IPM managed cropse0
- Outcome
- pestse0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Comparator
- participating farmers current pest management practicese1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“an increasing trend in the number of beneficial organisms a reduction in pests and a 50 reduction in the number of insecticides applied in the IPM managed crops”
e1“compared to six adjacent crops grown under the participating farmers current pest management practices”
t0“autumnsown wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Insecticide applications were reduced by 50 under IPM.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- IPM managed cropse0
- Outcome
- number of insecticides appliede0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 50e0
- Comparator
- participating farmers current pest management practicese1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“a 50 reduction in the number of insecticides applied in the IPM managed crops”
e1“compared to six adjacent crops grown under the participating farmers current pest management practices”
t0“autumnsown wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
YDV differed negligibly between IPM and farmer practice.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- IPMe2
- Interactor
- YDVe0pathogen
- Outcome
- YDVe0
- Direction
- negligiblee0
- Comparator
- participating farmers current pest management practicese1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“There were negligible YDV and crop yield differences between the two approaches”
e1“compared to six adjacent crops grown under the participating farmers current pest management practices”
e2“IPM managed crops”
t0“autumnsown wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Crop yield differed negligibly between IPM and farmer practice.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- IPMe2
- Outcome
- crop yielde0
- Direction
- negligiblee0
- Comparator
- participating farmers current pest management practicese1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“There were negligible YDV and crop yield differences between the two approaches”
e1“compared to six adjacent crops grown under the participating farmers current pest management practices”
e2“IPM managed crops”
t0“autumnsown wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
IPM adoption was very high after the participatory trials.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- IPM adoptione0
- Direction
- very highe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“IPM adoption at these farms was very high after these participatory trials”
t0“autumnsown wheat”
The same questions in other papers
ipm · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →ipm · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
ipm · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.