Paper · 2011 · African Journal of Agricultural Research

Effect of substrate on vegetative growth, quantitative and qualitative production of muskmelon (Cucumis melo) conducted in soilless culture

Afracirc; A. Radhouani; Mokhtar El Bekkay; et al.

9
claims
23
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Greenhouses heated and irrigated by geothermic water, constitute a promoter sector in the South of Tunisia. However, simultaneous salinity of sand and water of irrigation limits amply, the development of this sector. To control salinity, it seems efficient to adopt interesting agricultural techniques like soilless culture. The selection of suitable media is the key that ensures the success of this technique, seeing that the adoption of not standardized one, limits the correct nutrient solution management so the development of plant. The substrate selection must consider technical and economical implications. In this framework, two ubiquitous substrates of the South of Tunisia, sand and compost of dry palms, were compared to the imported media, perlite, for soilless culture of muskmelon (Cucumis melo). This study was based on the vegetative growth, quantitative and qualitative production. Results have shown that local substrates have simulated, in relation to perlite, strong and deep roots that permit an effective absorption of nutrients. Subsequently, leaves were larger, their content in fresh and dry matter were higher and stems were taller. This superiority was sustained by superiority of index of growth, NAR. This behavior has reverberated on precocity and yield that were greater on these two media. As regard to external characteristics of fruits, firmness and diameter were higher particularly on compost. With exception of pH, gustative quality was not affected by type of substrate. Key words: Greenhouse, muskmelon, substrate, vegetative growth, quantitative production, qualitative production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Local substrates gave strong and deep roots compared with perlite.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
local substratese1
Outcome
rootse1
Qualifier
strong and deepe1
Comparator
perlitee1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“muskmelon (Cucumis melo)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–109 · show in text ↑
e1

“local substrates have simulated, in relation to perlite, strong and deep roots that permit an effective absorption of nutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1052 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sand and dry palm compost substrates gave larger leaves than perlite.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
sand and compost of dry palmse0
Outcome
leavese2
Direction
largere2
Comparator
perlitee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“muskmelon (Cucumis melo)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–109 · show in text ↑
e0

“two ubiquitous substrates of the South of Tunisia, sand and compost of dry palms, were compared to the imported media, perlite”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–761 · show in text ↑
e2

“Subsequently, leaves were larger, their content in fresh and dry matter were higher and stems were taller”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1159 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sand and dry palm compost substrates gave higher fresh and dry matter content than perlite.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
sand and compost of dry palmse0
Outcome
content in fresh and dry mattere2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
perlitee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“muskmelon (Cucumis melo)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–109 · show in text ↑
e0

“two ubiquitous substrates of the South of Tunisia, sand and compost of dry palms, were compared to the imported media, perlite”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–761 · show in text ↑
e2

“Subsequently, leaves were larger, their content in fresh and dry matter were higher and stems were taller”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1159 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sand and dry palm compost substrates gave taller stems than perlite.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
sand and compost of dry palmse0
Outcome
stemse2
Direction
tallere2
Comparator
perlitee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“muskmelon (Cucumis melo)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–109 · show in text ↑
e0

“two ubiquitous substrates of the South of Tunisia, sand and compost of dry palms, were compared to the imported media, perlite”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–761 · show in text ↑
e2

“Subsequently, leaves were larger, their content in fresh and dry matter were higher and stems were taller”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1159 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The growth index and NAR were superior on the local substrates.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis melot0
Outcome
index of growth, NARe3
Direction
superioritye3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“muskmelon (Cucumis melo)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–109 · show in text ↑
e3

“This superiority was sustained by superiority of index of growth, NAR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1230 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Precocity and yield were greater on the sand and dry palm compost substrates than on perlite.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
sand and compost of dry palmse0
Outcome
precocity and yielde4
Direction
greatere4
Comparator
perlitee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“muskmelon (Cucumis melo)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–109 · show in text ↑
e0

“two ubiquitous substrates of the South of Tunisia, sand and compost of dry palms, were compared to the imported media, perlite”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–761 · show in text ↑
e4

“This behavior has reverberated on precocity and yield that were greater on these two media”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1322 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit firmness and diameter were higher on compost of dry palms.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis melot0
Organ / stage
fruitse5
Treatment
compost of dry palmse0
Outcome
firmness and diametere5
Direction
highere5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“muskmelon (Cucumis melo)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–109 · show in text ↑
e0

“two ubiquitous substrates of the South of Tunisia, sand and compost of dry palms, were compared to the imported media, perlite”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–761 · show in text ↑
e5

“As regard to external characteristics of fruits, firmness and diameter were higher particularly on compost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1430 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gustative quality was not affected by substrate type.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
type of substratee6
Outcome
gustative qualitye6
Direction
no_changeinferrede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“muskmelon (Cucumis melo)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–109 · show in text ↑
e6

“With exception of pH, gustative quality was not affected by type of substrate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1432–1509 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Substrate type affected pH of the fruit (direction not stated).

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
type of substratee6
Outcome
pHe6

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“muskmelon (Cucumis melo)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–109 · show in text ↑
e6

“With exception of pH, gustative quality was not affected by type of substrate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1432–1509 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results differ

95 papers: 72 positive, 23 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

91 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

growing medium · quality: general · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · quality: postharvest · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

fertilization · growth · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

74 papers: 57 positive, 17 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

70 papers more in this group

See all 74 papers →

growing medium · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

growing medium · growth · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.