Paper · 2009 · Journal of Phytopathology

Biological Control of Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici on Tomato by Brevibacillus brevis

Sunita Chandel; Eunice J. Allan; Steve Woodward

7
claims
7
verbatim quotes
71
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The ability of Brevibacillus brevis to influence development of disease on tomato caused by Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici was investigated using plants raised in Petri dish microcosms and in pots in the glasshouse. Development of symptoms on both microcosm‐ and glasshouse‐raised tomato plants was markedly reduced in co‐inoculations of F . oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici with B. brevis , compared with inoculations with the pathogen alone. Moreover, co‐inoculations resulted in significant growth boosting effects on the plants, with increases in plant height in microcosms and in total root lengths in glasshouse‐raised plants. In microcosm‐raised plants, the carrier used to inoculate seed with B. brevis , either carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) or vermiculite, had no effect on the persistence of the biological control agent on roots in the absence of inoculation with the pathogen. By contrast, numbers of B. brevis recovered from the rhizosphere and rhizoplane of inoculated plants in microcosms were four orders of magnitude lower than in plants treated with B. brevis alone . Moreover, higher numbers of B. brevis CFU were re‐isolated from the rhizosphere of plants arising from CMC‐coated seed, than vermiculite‐coated seed. The carrier had no effect on disease control. Inhibition of conidial germination and germ‐tube extension of F. oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici by cell‐free filtrates of B. brevis cultures varied significantly depending on the culture medium used for suspension. These results indicate that B. brevis is a potential biological control agent for reducing the impact of F. oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici on tomato.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coinoculation reduced tomato disease symptoms in microcosms and glasshouse plants.

Treatment
co‐inoculations of F . oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici with B. brevise0
Interactor
F . oxysporum f.sp. lycopersiciFusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersicie0pathogen
Second interactor
B. brevisBrevibacillus brevise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Development of symptomse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
inoculations with the pathogen alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici · Interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Development of symptoms on both microcosm‐ and glasshouse‐raised tomato plants was markedly reduced in co‐inoculations of F . oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici with B. brevis , compared with inoculations with the pathogen alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–453 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Coinoculation significantly increased tomato plant height in microcosms.

Treatment
co‐inoculationse0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasese0
Setting
microcosmse0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“co‐inoculations resulted in significant growth boosting effects on the plants, with increases in plant height in microcosms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–587 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Coinoculation significantly increased tomato root length in the glasshouse.

Treatment
co‐inoculationse0
Outcome
total root lengthse0
Direction
increasese0
Setting
glasshouse‐raised plantse0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“co‐inoculations resulted in significant growth boosting effects on the plants, with increases in plant height in microcosms and in total root lengths in glasshouse‐raised plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–642 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carrier choice did not affect B. brevis persistence on roots without pathogen inoculation.

Treatment
carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC)e0
Interactor
B. brevisBrevibacillus brevise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
persistence of the biological control agent on rootse0
Direction
had no effecte0
Comparator
vermiculitee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the carrier used to inoculate seed with B. brevis , either carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) or vermiculite, had no effect on the persistence of the biological control agent on roots in the absence of inoculation with the pathogen.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–898 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. brevis numbers in rhizosphere and rhizoplane were four orders lower with pathogen coinoculation.

Treatment
inoculated plantse0
Interactor
B. brevisBrevibacillus brevise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
numbers of B. brevis recovered from the rhizosphere and rhizoplanee0
Direction
lowere0
Value
four orders of magnitudee0
Comparator
plants treated with B. brevis alonee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“numbers of B. brevis recovered from the rhizosphere and rhizoplane of inoculated plants in microcosms were four orders of magnitude lower than in plants treated with B. brevis alone .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–1095 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CMC coated seed yielded more rhizosphere B. brevis colonies than vermiculite coated seed.

Treatment
CMC‐coated seede0
Interactor
B. brevisBrevibacillus brevise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
numbers of B. brevis CFUe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
vermiculite‐coated seede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“higher numbers of B. brevis CFU were re‐isolated from the rhizosphere of plants arising from CMC‐coated seed, than vermiculite‐coated seed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1245 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carrier choice had no effect on disease control.

Treatment
carriere0
Outcome
disease controle0
Direction
had no effecte0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The carrier had no effect on disease control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1246–1291 · show in text ↑

inoculation · Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 15 positive, 11 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.