Paper · 2005 · South African Journal of Plant and Soil

Effect of chemical seed treatment on the germination and seedling vigour of canola (Brassica napus var. oleifera)

R. J. de Villiers; G. A. Agenbag; S. C. Lamprecht

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Incubation studies were conducted to determine effects of two chemical seed treatments (Cruiser & SA-combination) on the germination and seedling vigour of canola (cv. Varola 44) seed. Germination percentages of the Cruiser and SA-combination treated seeds were not significantly reduced compared to untreated seeds (control) under favourable temperature and water conditions. After exposure to high temperature (41 °C) and humidity to accelerate ageing of the seed, germination and seedling vigour were reduced by both seed treatments. In contrast to differences in germination which decreased with time of incubation, the effect of both chemical treatments on seedling vigour increased as the incubation period increased. As expected, phytotoxic effects increased with increasing application rates, but significant differences in germination percentage and seedling growth between similar rates of the two chemical treatments indicated that the SA combination treatment was more phytotoxic than Cruiser.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cruiser did not significantly reduce canola germination under favourable conditions.

Material
Varola 44e1
Treatment
Cruisere0
Outcome
Germination percentagese0
Direction
not significantly reducede0
Qualifier
favourable temperature and water conditionse0
Comparator
untreated seeds (control)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Germination percentages of the Cruiser and SA-combination treated seeds were not significantly reduced compared to untreated seeds (control) under favourable temperature and water conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–376 · show in text ↑
e1

“canola (cv. Varola 44) seed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–184 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SA-combination did not significantly reduce canola germination under favourable conditions.

Material
Varola 44e1
Treatment
SA-combinatione0
Outcome
Germination percentagese0
Direction
not significantly reducede0
Comparator
untreated seeds (control)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Germination percentages of the Cruiser and SA-combination treated seeds were not significantly reduced compared to untreated seeds (control) under favourable temperature and water conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–376 · show in text ↑
e1

“canola (cv. Varola 44) seed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–184 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After accelerated ageing, Cruiser reduced canola germination and seedling vigour.

Treatment
Cruisere1
Outcome
germination and seedling vigoure0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
high temperature (41 °C) and humiditye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After exposure to high temperature (41 °C) and humidity to accelerate ageing of the seed, germination and seedling vigour were reduced by both seed treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–536 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cruiser and SA-combination treated seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 216–256 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After accelerated ageing, SA-combination reduced canola germination and seedling vigour.

Treatment
SA-combinatione1
Outcome
germination and seedling vigoure0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After exposure to high temperature (41 °C) and humidity to accelerate ageing of the seed, germination and seedling vigour were reduced by both seed treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–536 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cruiser and SA-combination treated seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 216–256 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–82 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Germination differences decreased as incubation time increased.

Organ / stage
germinatione0
Outcome
differences in germinatione0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
time of incubatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“differences in germination which decreased with time of incubation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–618 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–82 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both chemical treatments had a growing effect on seedling vigour with longer incubation.

Treatment
both chemical treatmentse0
Outcome
effect of both chemical treatments on seedling vigoure0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effect of both chemical treatments on seedling vigour increased as the incubation period increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–723 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–82 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phytotoxic effects increased with application rate.

Treatment
increasing application ratese0
Outcome
phytotoxic effectse0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“phytotoxic effects increased with increasing application rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–799 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SA combination was more phytotoxic than Cruiser at similar rates, with significant germination and growth differences.

Treatment
SA combination treatmente0
Outcome
phytotoxice0
Direction
more phytotoxice0
Qualifier
similar ratese0
Comparator
Cruisere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant differences in germination percentage and seedling growth between similar rates of the two chemical treatments indicated that the SA combination treatment was more phytotoxic than Cruiser.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–1005 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–82 · show in text ↑

salicylic acid · crop injury · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.