Paper · 2011 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Changes in pH, acids, sugars and other quality parameters during extended vine holding of ripe processing tomatoes

Gordon E Anthon; Michelle LeStrange; Diane M Barrett

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
248
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Two important quality attributes of processing tomatoes are pH and titratable acidity. These and other quality attributes can be affected by tomato fruit maturity and over-maturity. We have determined the magnitude of these maturity effects in four processing tomato cultivars commonly grown in California. RESULTS: Allowing tomatoes to remain on the vine for up to 4 weeks after ripening resulted in an increase in fruit pH of between 0.01 and 0.02 unit per day for the four cultivars examined. The increase in pH was paralleled by a decrease in titratable acidity, due to a loss of citric acid. Glucose and fructose concentrations also declined with increasing maturity after ripening. Other quality parameters (color, lycopene, total pectin, pectin solubility, and Bostwick consistency) all showed little change. CONCLUSION: Vine holding of ripe fruit adversely affects quality, especially pH and titratable acidity. Recent problems with high tomato juice pH encountered by tomato processors in California could be the result of increased average fruit maturity at harvest.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vine holding up to 4 weeks after ripening increased fruit pH by 0.01 to 0.02 unit per day in four processing tomato cultivars.

Taxon
processing tomatoe0
Organ / stage
fruite1
Treatment
Allowing tomatoes to remain on the vine for up to 4 weeks after ripeninge1
Outcome
fruit pHe1
Direction
increasee1
Value
between 0.01 and 0.02 unit per daye1
Qualifier
for the four cultivars examinede1
Setting
Californiae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“four processing tomato cultivars commonly grown in California”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–317 · show in text ↑
e1

“Allowing tomatoes to remain on the vine for up to 4 weeks after ripening resulted in an increase in fruit pH of between 0.01 and 0.02 unit per day for the four cultivars examined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–506 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glucose and fructose concentrations declined with increasing maturity after ripening in processing tomato fruit.

Taxon
processing tomatoe0
Treatment
increasing maturity after ripeninge2
Outcome
Glucose and fructose concentrationse2
Direction
declinede2

Verbatim

e0

“four processing tomato cultivars commonly grown in California”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–317 · show in text ↑
e2

“Glucose and fructose concentrations also declined with increasing maturity after ripening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–698 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Titratable acidity decreased in parallel with the rise in fruit pH in processing tomato.

Taxon
processing tomatoe0
Compound
citric acide3
Outcome
titratable aciditye3
Direction
decreasee3

Verbatim

e0

“four processing tomato cultivars commonly grown in California”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–317 · show in text ↑
e3

“The increase in pH was paralleled by a decrease in titratable acidity, due to a loss of citric acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 508–607 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The decrease in titratable acidity in processing tomato is attributed to a loss of citric acid.

Taxon
processing tomatoe0
Compound
citric acide3
Outcome
titratable aciditye3
Qualifier
due to a loss of citric acide3

Verbatim

e0

“four processing tomato cultivars commonly grown in California”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–317 · show in text ↑
e3

“The increase in pH was paralleled by a decrease in titratable acidity, due to a loss of citric acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 508–607 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Color, lycopene and total pectin showed little change with extended vine holding of processing tomato.

Taxon
processing tomatoe0
Treatment
Allowing tomatoes to remain on the vine for up to 4 weeks after ripeninge1
Outcome
color, lycopene, total pectine4
Direction
no_changeinferrede4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“four processing tomato cultivars commonly grown in California”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–317 · show in text ↑
e1

“Allowing tomatoes to remain on the vine for up to 4 weeks after ripening resulted in an increase in fruit pH of between 0.01 and 0.02 unit per day for the four cultivars examined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–506 · show in text ↑
e4

“Other quality parameters (color, lycopene, total pectin, pectin solubility, and Bostwick consistency) all showed little change”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–826 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pectin solubility and Bostwick consistency showed little change with extended vine holding of processing tomato.

Taxon
processing tomatoe0
Treatment
Allowing tomatoes to remain on the vine for up to 4 weeks after ripeninge1
Outcome
pectin solubility, and Bostwick consistencye4
Direction
no_changeinferrede4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“four processing tomato cultivars commonly grown in California”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–317 · show in text ↑
e1

“Allowing tomatoes to remain on the vine for up to 4 weeks after ripening resulted in an increase in fruit pH of between 0.01 and 0.02 unit per day for the four cultivars examined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–506 · show in text ↑
e4

“Other quality parameters (color, lycopene, total pectin, pectin solubility, and Bostwick consistency) all showed little change”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–826 · show in text ↑
Associationhypothesisoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Increased average fruit maturity at harvest could be the result of high tomato juice pH seen in California processing.

Treatment
increased average fruit maturity at harveste5
Outcome
tomato juice pHe5
Direction
higherinferrede5
Qualifier
could be the resulte5
Setting
Californiae5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Recent problems with high tomato juice pH encountered by tomato processors in California could be the result of increased average fruit maturity at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1087 · show in text ↑

stage · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 2 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

stage · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 3 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.