Paper · 2014 · Journal of Integrative Plant Biology

Nitric oxide alleviates aluminum‐induced oxidative damage through regulating the ascorbate‐glutathione cycle in roots of wheat

Chengliang Sun; Lijuan Liu; Yan Yu; et al.

17
claims
21
verbatim quotes
117
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The possible association with nitric oxide (NO) and ascorbate-glutathione (AsA-GSH) cycle in regulating aluminum (Al) tolerance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) was investigated using two genotypes with different Al resistance. Exposure to Al inhibited root elongation, and triggered lipid peroxidation and oxidation of AsA to dehydroascorbate and GSH to glutathione disulfide in wheat roots. Exogenous NO significantly increased endogenous NO levels, and subsequently alleviated Al-induced inhibition of root elongation and oxidation of AsA and GSH to maintain the redox molecules in the reduced form in both wheat genotypes. Under Al stress, significantly increased activities and gene transcriptional levels of ascorbate peroxidase, glutathione reductase, and dehydroascorbate reductase, were observed in the root tips of the Al-tolerant genotype Jian-864. Nitric oxide application enhanced the activity and gene transcriptional level of these enzymes in both wheat genotypes. γ-Glutamylcysteine synthetase was not significantly affected by Al or NO, but NO treatments increased the activity of glutathione peroxidase and glutathione S-transferase to a greater extent than the Al-treated wheat seedlings. Proline was significantly decreased by Al, while it was not affected by NO. These results clearly suggest that NO protects wheat root against Al-induced oxidative stress, possibly through its regulation of the AsA-GSH cycle.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Al exposure inhibited wheat root elongation.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
Ale0
Outcome
root elongatione0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exposure to Al inhibited root elongation, and triggered lipid peroxidation and oxidation of AsA to dehydroascorbate and GSH to glutathione disulfide in wheat roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 227–391 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Al exposure triggered lipid peroxidation in wheat roots.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
Ale0
Outcome
lipid peroxidatione0
Direction
triggerede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exposure to Al inhibited root elongation, and triggered lipid peroxidation and oxidation of AsA to dehydroascorbate and GSH to glutathione disulfide in wheat roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 227–391 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Al exposure triggered oxidation of AsA to dehydroascorbate in wheat roots.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
Ale0
Outcome
oxidation of AsA to dehydroascorbatee0
Direction
triggerede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exposure to Al inhibited root elongation, and triggered lipid peroxidation and oxidation of AsA to dehydroascorbate and GSH to glutathione disulfide in wheat roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 227–391 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Al exposure triggered GSH to glutathione disulfide in wheat roots.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
Ale0
Outcome
GSH to glutathione disulfidee0
Direction
triggerede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exposure to Al inhibited root elongation, and triggered lipid peroxidation and oxidation of AsA to dehydroascorbate and GSH to glutathione disulfide in wheat roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 227–391 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Exogenous NO increased endogenous NO levels in both wheat genotypes.

Treatment
Exogenous NOe0
Outcome
endogenous NO levelse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
both wheat genotypese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exogenous NO significantly increased endogenous NO levels, and subsequently alleviated Al-induced inhibition of root elongation and oxidation of AsA and GSH to maintain the redox molecules in the reduced form in both wheat genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–625 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exogenous NO alleviated Al-induced inhibition of root elongation in both wheat genotypes.

Treatment
Exogenous NOe0
Outcome
Al-induced inhibition of root elongatione0
Direction
alleviatede0
Qualifier
both wheat genotypese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exogenous NO significantly increased endogenous NO levels, and subsequently alleviated Al-induced inhibition of root elongation and oxidation of AsA and GSH to maintain the redox molecules in the reduced form in both wheat genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–625 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exogenous NO alleviated oxidation of AsA and GSH in both wheat genotypes.

Treatment
Exogenous NOe0
Outcome
oxidation of AsA and GSHe0
Direction
alleviatede0
Qualifier
both wheat genotypese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exogenous NO significantly increased endogenous NO levels, and subsequently alleviated Al-induced inhibition of root elongation and oxidation of AsA and GSH to maintain the redox molecules in the reduced form in both wheat genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–625 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under Al stress, activities of three redox enzymes increased in Jian-864 root tips.

Material
Jian-864e0
Organ / stage
root tipse0
Gene
ascorbate peroxidase, glutathione reductase, and dehydroascorbate reductasee0
Outcome
activitiese0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under Al stress, significantly increased activities and gene transcriptional levels of ascorbate peroxidase, glutathione reductase, and dehydroascorbate reductase, were observed in the root tips of the Al-tolerant genotype Jian-864.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–858 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–126 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under Al stress, gene transcriptional levels of three redox enzymes increased in Jian-864 root tips.

Material
Jian-864e0
Organ / stage
root tipse0
Gene
ascorbate peroxidase, glutathione reductase, and dehydroascorbate reductasee0
Outcome
gene transcriptional levelse0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under Al stress, significantly increased activities and gene transcriptional levels of ascorbate peroxidase, glutathione reductase, and dehydroascorbate reductase, were observed in the root tips of the Al-tolerant genotype Jian-864.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–858 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NO application enhanced enzyme activity in both wheat genotypes.

Treatment
Nitric oxide applicatione0
Outcome
activitye0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
both wheat genotypese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitric oxide application enhanced the activity and gene transcriptional level of these enzymes in both wheat genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–978 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NO application enhanced enzyme gene transcriptional level in both wheat genotypes.

Treatment
Nitric oxide applicatione0
Outcome
gene transcriptional levele0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
both wheat genotypese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitric oxide application enhanced the activity and gene transcriptional level of these enzymes in both wheat genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–978 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Al did not significantly affect γ-Glutamylcysteine synthetase.

Treatment
Ale0
Gene
γ-Glutamylcysteine synthetasee0
Outcome
γ-Glutamylcysteine synthetasee0
Direction
not significantly affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“γ-Glutamylcysteine synthetase was not significantly affected by Al or NO, but NO treatments increased the activity of glutathione peroxidase and glutathione S-transferase to a greater extent than the Al-treated wheat seedlings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1206 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NO did not significantly affect γ-Glutamylcysteine synthetase.

Treatment
NOe0
Gene
γ-Glutamylcysteine synthetasee0
Outcome
γ-Glutamylcysteine synthetasee0
Direction
not significantly affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“γ-Glutamylcysteine synthetase was not significantly affected by Al or NO, but NO treatments increased the activity of glutathione peroxidase and glutathione S-transferase to a greater extent than the Al-treated wheat seedlings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1206 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NO treatments increased glutathione peroxidase and glutathione S-transferase activity more than Al treatment.

Treatment
NO treatmentse0
Gene
glutathione peroxidase and glutathione S-transferasee0
Outcome
activity of glutathione peroxidase and glutathione S-transferasee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
Al-treated wheat seedlingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“γ-Glutamylcysteine synthetase was not significantly affected by Al or NO, but NO treatments increased the activity of glutathione peroxidase and glutathione S-transferase to a greater extent than the Al-treated wheat seedlings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1206 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Al significantly decreased proline.

Treatment
Ale0
Outcome
Prolinee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Proline was significantly decreased by Al, while it was not affected by NO.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1282 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NO did not affect proline.

Treatment
NOe0
Outcome
Prolinee0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Proline was significantly decreased by Al, while it was not affected by NO.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1282 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–126 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NO may protect wheat roots from Al oxidative stress through regulation of the AsA-GSH cycle.

Treatment
NOe0
Outcome
Al-induced oxidative stresse0
Qualifier
possibly through its regulation of the AsA-GSH cyclee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These results clearly suggest that NO protects wheat root against Al-induced oxidative stress, possibly through its regulation of the AsA-GSH cycle.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1431 · show in text ↑

aluminium atom · physiology: osmolytes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

nitric oxide · physiology: osmolytes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

aluminium atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

67 papers: 13 positive, 54 negative or no effect

53 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

63 papers more in this group

See all 67 papers →

nitric oxide · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

nitric oxide · molecular: expression · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

nitric oxide · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 7 positive, 4 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

aluminium atom · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 1 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

aluminium atom · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 15 positive, 25 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.