Paper · 1995 · Australian Journal of Agricultural Research

N application increases pre-anthesis contribution of dry matter to grain yield in wheat grown on a duplex soil

JA Palta; IRP Fillery

15
claims
32
verbatim quotes
86
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effect of fertilizer N on the growth, post-anthesis water deficits and remobilization of dry matter in spring wheat was measured on a duplex soil at East Beverley, Western Australia. Nitrogen was applied at 15, 30 and 60 kg N ha-1 with half being applied at seeding and the remainder at 35 days after sowing (DAS), immediately before the onset of tillering. The applied N generated differences in early growth (76-117 g m-2) and dry matter at anthesis (410-693 g m-2), mainly through the effect of N on tiller number (120-171 m-2) and tiller size. It also generated differences in the water deficit, particularly after flowering. During the first 21 days after anthesis, midday flag leaf water potential fell at rates of 0.04, 0.07 and 0.13 MPa day-1 at 15, 30 and 60 kg N ha-1 respectively. Grain yield at 60 kg N ha-1 was increased by 20% relative to that of 15 kg N ha-1. The increase in grain yield resulted from an increase in the number of ears and grain number per ear. The high N treatment probably induced the increase in the number of fertile tillers (tillers with an ear), but reduced the grain size by 16% relative to the low N treatment. Contribution of preanthesis dry matter to grain yield was 193 g m-2 for the wheat receiving 60 kg N ha-1, 71 g m-2 for wheat which received 30 kg N ha-1 and only 16 g m-2 for wheat which received 15 kg N ha-1. This indicates that at high N supply, grain growth was substantially supported by pre-anthesis stored assimilates.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied N generated differences in early wheat growth.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
applied Ne0
Outcome
early growthe0
Direction
differencese0
Value
76-117 g m-2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The applied N generated differences in early growth (76-117 g m-2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–428 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied N generated differences in dry matter at anthesis.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
applied Ne1
Outcome
dry matter at anthesise0
Direction
differencese1
Value
410-693 g m-2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dry matter at anthesis (410-693 g m-2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–471 · show in text ↑
e1

“The applied N generated differences in early growth (76-117 g m-2) and dry matter at anthesis (410-693 g m-2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–471 · show in text ↑
e2

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen affected tiller number and tiller size.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
Ne0
Outcome
tiller numbere0
Value
120-171 m-2e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effect of N on tiller number (120-171 m-2) and tiller size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–550 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N generated differences in water deficit, especially after flowering.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
fertilizer Ne1
Outcome
water deficite0
Direction
differencese0
Qualifier
particularly after floweringe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It also generated differences in the water deficit, particularly after flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–632 · show in text ↑
e1

“fertilizer N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 14–26 · show in text ↑
e2

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–119 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flag leaf water potential fell at 0.04 MPa per day at 15 kg N per hectare.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
15e0
Outcome
midday flag leaf water potentiale0
Direction
felle0
Value
0.04e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“midday flag leaf water potential fell at rates of 0.04, 0.07 and 0.13 MPa day-1 at 15, 30 and 60 kg N ha-1 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–794 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–119 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flag leaf water potential fell at 0.07 MPa per day at 30 kg N per hectare.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
30e0
Outcome
midday flag leaf water potentiale0
Direction
felle0
Value
0.07e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“midday flag leaf water potential fell at rates of 0.04, 0.07 and 0.13 MPa day-1 at 15, 30 and 60 kg N ha-1 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–794 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–119 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flag leaf water potential fell at 0.13 MPa per day at 60 kg N per hectare.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
60 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
midday flag leaf water potentiale0
Direction
felle0
Value
0.13e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“midday flag leaf water potential fell at rates of 0.04, 0.07 and 0.13 MPa day-1 at 15, 30 and 60 kg N ha-1 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–794 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield was 20% higher at 60 than 15 kg N per hectare.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
60 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
20%e0
Comparator
15 kg N ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield at 60 kg N ha-1 was increased by 20% relative to that of 15 kg N ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–877 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–119 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher grain yield was attributed to more ears and more grains per ear.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume1
Outcome
increase in grain yielde0
Qualifier
increase in the number of ears and grain number per eare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in grain yield resulted from an increase in the number of ears and grain number per ear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–979 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High N probably increased the number of fertile tillers.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
high N treatmente0
Outcome
number of fertile tillerse0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
probablye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The high N treatment probably induced the increase in the number of fertile tillers (tillers with an ear)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1086 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High N reduced grain size by 16% relative to low N.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
high N treatmente1
Outcome
grain sizee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
16%e0
Comparator
low N treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduced the grain size by 16% relative to the low N treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1153 · show in text ↑
e1

“The high N treatment probably induced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1018 · show in text ↑
e2

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–119 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preanthesis dry matter contributed 193 g per square metre to grain yield at 60 kg N per hectare.

Treatment
60 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
Contribution of preanthesis dry matter to grain yielde0
Value
193 g m-2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Contribution of preanthesis dry matter to grain yield was 193 g m-2 for the wheat receiving 60 kg N ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1259 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preanthesis dry matter contributed 71 g per square metre to grain yield at 30 kg N per hectare.

Treatment
30 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
Contribution of preanthesis dry matter to grain yielde1
Value
71 g m-2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“71 g m-2 for wheat which received 30 kg N ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1307 · show in text ↑
e1

“Contribution of preanthesis dry matter to grain yield was 193 g m-2 for the wheat receiving 60 kg N ha-1, 71 g m-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1269 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preanthesis dry matter contributed 16 g per square metre to grain yield at 15 kg N per hectare.

Treatment
15 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
Contribution of preanthesis dry matter to grain yielde1
Value
16 g m-2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only 16 g m-2 for wheat which received 15 kg N ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1363 · show in text ↑
e1

“Contribution of preanthesis dry matter to grain yield was 193 g m-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1222 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High N grain growth was substantially supported by preanthesis stored assimilates.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume1
Outcome
grain growthe0
Qualifier
pre-anthesis stored assimilatese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at high N supply, grain growth was substantially supported by pre-anthesis stored assimilates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1385–1478 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–119 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.