Paper · 1990 · Journal of Experimental Botany

Response of Soybean Canopy Photosynthesis to CO2Concentration, Light, and Temperature

WILLIAM J. CAMPBELL; L. H. ALLEN; GEORGE BOWES

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
113
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Photosynthetic rates of outdoor-grown soybean (Glycine max L. Merr. cv. Bragg) canopies increased with increasing CO2 concentration during growth, before and after canopy closure (complete light interception), when measured over a wide range of solar irradiance values. Total canopy leaf area was greater as the CO2 concentration during growth was increased from 160 to 990 mm3 dm−3. Photosynthetic rates of canopies grown at 330 and 660 mm3 CO2 dm−3 were similar when measured at the same CO2 concentrations and high irradiance. There was no difference in ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (rubisco) activity or ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate (RuBP) concentration between plants grown at the two CO2 concentrations. However, photosynthetic rates averaged 87% greater for the canopies grown and measured at 660 mm3 CO2 dm−3. A 10°C difference in air temperature during growth resulted in only a 4°C leaf temperature difference, which was insufficient to change the photosynthetic rate or rubisco activity in canopies grown and measured at either 330 or 660 mm3 CO2 dm−3. RuBP concentrations decreased as air temperature during growth was increased at both CO2 concentrations. These data indicate that the increased photosynthetic rates of soybean canopies at elevated CO2 are due to several factors, including: more rapid development of the leaf area index; a reduction in substrate CO2 limitation; and no downward acclimation in photosynthetic capacity, as occur in some other species.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canopy photosynthetic rates rose with growth CO2 before and after closure across irradiance values.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Material
Bragge0
Outcome
Photosynthetic ratese0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
before and after canopy closuree0
Setting
outdoor-growne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Photosynthetic rates of outdoor-grown soybean (Glycine max L. Merr. cv. Bragg) canopies increased with increasing CO2 concentration during growth, before and after canopy closure (complete light interception), when measured over a wide range of solar irradiance values.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–269 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total canopy leaf area increased as growth CO2 rose from 160 to 990 mm3 dm−3.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
CO2 concentration during growthe0
Outcome
Total canopy leaf areae0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
160 to 990 mm3 dm−3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total canopy leaf area was greater as the CO2 concentration during growth was increased from 160 to 990 mm3 dm−3.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 270–383 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canopies grown at 330 or 660 mm3 CO2 dm−3 had similar photosynthesis under common measurement CO2 and high irradiance.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
660 mm3 CO2 dm−3e0
Outcome
Photosynthetic ratese0
Direction
similare0
Qualifier
same CO2 concentrations and high irradiancee0
Comparator
330e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Photosynthetic rates of canopies grown at 330 and 660 mm3 CO2 dm−3 were similar when measured at the same CO2 concentrations and high irradiance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–529 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rubisco activity did not differ between the two growth CO2 levels.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
660 mm3 CO2 dm−3e1
Outcome
ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (rubisco) activitye0
Direction
no differencee0
Comparator
330e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no difference in ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (rubisco) activity or ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate (RuBP) concentration between plants grown at the two CO2 concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–721 · show in text ↑
e1

“330 and 660 mm3 CO2 dm−3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 426–450 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RuBP concentration did not differ between the two growth CO2 levels.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
660 mm3 CO2 dm−3e1
Outcome
ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate (RuBP) concentratione0
Direction
no differencee0
Comparator
330e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no difference in ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (rubisco) activity or ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate (RuBP) concentration between plants grown at the two CO2 concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–721 · show in text ↑
e1

“330 and 660 mm3 CO2 dm−3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 426–450 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canopies grown and measured at 660 mm3 CO2 dm−3 averaged 87% more photosynthesis.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
660 mm3 CO2 dm−3e0
Outcome
photosynthetic ratese0
Direction
greatere0
Value
87%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“photosynthetic rates averaged 87% greater for the canopies grown and measured at 660 mm3 CO2 dm−3.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–829 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 10°C air temperature difference produced only a 4°C leaf temperature difference.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
10°C difference in air temperature during growthe0
Outcome
leaf temperature differencee0
Value
4°Ce0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A 10°C difference in air temperature during growth resulted in only a 4°C leaf temperature difference”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–931 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The temperature difference did not change photosynthetic rate at either CO2 level.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
10°C difference in air temperature during growthe1
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
insufficient to changee0
Qualifier
either 330 or 660 mm3 CO2 dm−3e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“which was insufficient to change the photosynthetic rate or rubisco activity in canopies grown and measured at either 330 or 660 mm3 CO2 dm−3.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1075 · show in text ↑
e1

“A 10°C difference in air temperature during growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–880 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The temperature difference did not change rubisco activity at either CO2 level.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
10°C difference in air temperature during growthe1
Outcome
rubisco activitye0
Direction
insufficient to changee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“which was insufficient to change the photosynthetic rate or rubisco activity in canopies grown and measured at either 330 or 660 mm3 CO2 dm−3.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1075 · show in text ↑
e1

“A 10°C difference in air temperature during growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–880 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–19 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RuBP concentration declined with higher growth air temperature at both CO2 levels.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
air temperature during growthe0
Outcome
RuBP concentrationse0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
both CO2 concentrationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RuBP concentrations decreased as air temperature during growth was increased at both CO2 concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1180 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–19 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors attribute enhanced photosynthesis at elevated CO2 partly to faster leaf area index development.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
elevated CO2e0
Outcome
increased photosynthetic ratese0
Qualifier
more rapid development of the leaf area indexe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the increased photosynthetic rates of soybean canopies at elevated CO2 are due to several factors, including: more rapid development of the leaf area index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1361 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors attribute enhanced photosynthesis at elevated CO2 partly to reduced substrate CO2 limitation.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
elevated CO2e0
Outcome
increased photosynthetic ratese0
Qualifier
a reduction in substrate CO2 limitatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the increased photosynthetic rates of soybean canopies at elevated CO2 are due to several factors, including: more rapid development of the leaf area index; a reduction in substrate CO2 limitation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1402 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors attribute enhanced photosynthesis at elevated CO2 partly to no downward acclimation in photosynthetic capacity.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
elevated CO2e0
Outcome
increased photosynthetic ratese0
Qualifier
no downward acclimation in photosynthetic capacitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the increased photosynthetic rates of soybean canopies at elevated CO2 are due to several factors, including: more rapid development of the leaf area index; a reduction in substrate CO2 limitation; and no downward acclimation in photosynthetic capacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1458 · show in text ↑

co2 · physiology: photosynthesis · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

64 papers: 50 positive, 14 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

60 papers more in this group

See all 64 papers →

co2 · molecular: metabolites · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 15 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.