Paper · 1999 · Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science

Sugar beet and Barley Yields in Relation toBacillus polymyxa andBacillus megaterium var. phosphaticum Inoculation

Ramazan Çakmakçi; Faik Kantar; Ö. Faruk Algur

14
claims
19
verbatim quotes
50
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Microbiological fertilizers are an important part of environment friendly sustainable agricultural practices. A study was conducted in order to investigate seed inoculation of sugar beet (cv. Sonja) and barley (cv. Tokak), with nitrogen fixing (Bacillus polymyxa) and phosphate dissolving (Bacillus megaterium var. phosphaticum) bacteria in comparison to control and mineral fertilizer application in the green house and in the field at two sites in 1996 and 1997 in Erzurum (29o 55' N and 41o 16' E with an altitude of 1950 m), Turkey. In the green house trial bacterial inoculation of seeds increased sugar beet root and barley seed yields compared with control. B. polymyxa was more effective, but dual inoculations gave increases of 19.0 and 25.9% respectively. In the field as an average of sites and years sugar beet root yields were increased by 12.0%, 7.5% and 16.5% while barley seed yields were increased by 15.0%, 8.4% and 18.2% respectively with B. polymyxa, B. megaterium var. phosphaticum and dual applications over control treatment. Other yield and yield components were also enhanced especially by dual applications. However, increases in yield and yield components were lower than or comparable to mineral fertilizer application. The beneficial effect of bacterial inoculation was higher in well irrigated pot trials and at the site of rich clayey soils. In conclusion, microbial inoculation of seeds with Bacillus polymyxa and B. megaterium var. phosphaticum, alone or in dual combinations, may substitute costly NP fertilizers in sugar beet and barley production even in cold highland areas such as in Erzurum.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greenhouse bacterial inoculation increased sugar beet root yield over control.

Treatment
bacterial inoculation of seedse0
Outcome
sugar beet roote0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0
Setting
green house triale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the green house trial bacterial inoculation of seeds increased sugar beet root and barley seed yields compared with control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–663 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greenhouse bacterial inoculation increased barley seed yield over control.

Treatment
bacterial inoculation of seedse0
Outcome
barley seed yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0
Setting
green house triale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the green house trial bacterial inoculation of seeds increased sugar beet root and barley seed yields compared with control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–663 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual inoculation increased sugar beet yield by 19.0% in the greenhouse.

Treatment
dual inoculationse0
Outcome
increasese0
Direction
increasese0
Value
19.0e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dual inoculations gave increases of 19.0 and 25.9% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–764 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual inoculation increased barley yield by 25.9% in the greenhouse.

Treatment
dual inoculationse0
Outcome
increasese0
Direction
increasese0
Value
25.9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dual inoculations gave increases of 19.0 and 25.9% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–764 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field sugar beet root yield rose 12.0% with B. polymyxa.

Treatment
B. polymyxae0
Interactor
B. polymyxaPaenibacillus polymyxae0symbiont
Outcome
sugar beet root yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
12.0%e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Paenibacillus polymyxa
Paenibacillus polymyxa · InteractorDr. W.A. Clark · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sugar beet root yields were increased by 12.0%, 7.5% and 16.5% while barley seed yields were increased by 15.0%, 8.4% and 18.2% respectively with B. polymyxa, B. megaterium var. phosphaticum and dual applications over control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–1047 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field sugar beet root yield rose 7.5% with B. megaterium var. phosphaticum.

Treatment
B. megaterium var. phosphaticume0
Interactor
B. megaterium var. phosphaticumPriestia megateriume0symbiont
Outcome
sugar beet root yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
7.5%e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Priestia megaterium
Priestia megaterium · InteractorOsmoregulator / Osmoregulator at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sugar beet root yields were increased by 12.0%, 7.5% and 16.5% while barley seed yields were increased by 15.0%, 8.4% and 18.2% respectively with B. polymyxa, B. megaterium var. phosphaticum and dual applications over control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–1047 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field sugar beet root yield rose 16.5% with dual application.

Treatment
dual applicationse0
Interactor
B. polymyxaPaenibacillus polymyxae0symbiont
Second interactor
B. megaterium var. phosphaticumPriestia megateriume0symbiont
Outcome
sugar beet root yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
16.5%e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Paenibacillus polymyxa
Paenibacillus polymyxa · InteractorDr. W.A. Clark · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Priestia megaterium
Priestia megaterium · Second interactorOsmoregulator / Osmoregulator at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sugar beet root yields were increased by 12.0%, 7.5% and 16.5% while barley seed yields were increased by 15.0%, 8.4% and 18.2% respectively with B. polymyxa, B. megaterium var. phosphaticum and dual applications over control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–1047 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field barley seed yield rose 15.0% with B. polymyxa.

Treatment
B. polymyxae0
Interactor
B. polymyxaPaenibacillus polymyxae0symbiont
Outcome
barley seed yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
15.0%e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Paenibacillus polymyxa
Paenibacillus polymyxa · InteractorDr. W.A. Clark · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sugar beet root yields were increased by 12.0%, 7.5% and 16.5% while barley seed yields were increased by 15.0%, 8.4% and 18.2% respectively with B. polymyxa, B. megaterium var. phosphaticum and dual applications over control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–1047 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field barley seed yield rose 8.4% with B. megaterium var. phosphaticum.

Treatment
B. megaterium var. phosphaticume0
Interactor
B. megaterium var. phosphaticumPriestia megateriume0symbiont
Outcome
barley seed yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
8.4%e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Priestia megaterium
Priestia megaterium · InteractorOsmoregulator / Osmoregulator at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sugar beet root yields were increased by 12.0%, 7.5% and 16.5% while barley seed yields were increased by 15.0%, 8.4% and 18.2% respectively with B. polymyxa, B. megaterium var. phosphaticum and dual applications over control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–1047 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field barley seed yield rose 18.2% with dual application.

Treatment
dual applicationse0
Interactor
B. polymyxaPaenibacillus polymyxae0symbiont
Second interactor
B. megaterium var. phosphaticumPriestia megateriume0symbiont
Outcome
barley seed yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
18.2%e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Paenibacillus polymyxa
Paenibacillus polymyxa · InteractorDr. W.A. Clark · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Priestia megaterium
Priestia megaterium · Second interactorOsmoregulator / Osmoregulator at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sugar beet root yields were increased by 12.0%, 7.5% and 16.5% while barley seed yields were increased by 15.0%, 8.4% and 18.2% respectively with B. polymyxa, B. megaterium var. phosphaticum and dual applications over control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–1047 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other yield components improved especially under dual application.

Treatment
dual applicationse0
Outcome
Other yield and yield componentse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Other yield and yield components were also enhanced especially by dual applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1132 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet and barley”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 0–21 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation yield gains were lower than or comparable with mineral fertilizer.

Outcome
yield and yield componentse0
Direction
lower than or comparablee0
Comparator
mineral fertilizer applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increases in yield and yield components were lower than or comparable to mineral fertilizer application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1246 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet and barley”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 0–21 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The beneficial inoculation effect was higher in irrigated pot trials and rich clayey soils.

Treatment
bacterial inoculatione0
Outcome
beneficial effecte0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
rich clayey soilse0
Setting
well irrigated pot trialse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The beneficial effect of bacterial inoculation was higher in well irrigated pot trials and at the site of rich clayey soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1371 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet and barley”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 0–21 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose bacterial seed inoculation as a substitute for NP fertilizer.

Treatment
microbial inoculation of seeds with Bacillus polymyxa and B. megaterium var. phosphaticume0
Outcome
may substitute costly NP fertilizerse0
Setting
Erzurume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“microbial inoculation of seeds with Bacillus polymyxa and B. megaterium var. phosphaticum, alone or in dual combinations, may substitute costly NP fertilizers in sugar beet and barley production even in cold highland areas such as in Erzurum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1388–1629 · show in text ↑

Priestia megaterium · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

100 papers: 83 positive, 17 negative or no effect

82 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
    Inoculated barley yielded less than sprayed barley.

    Analysis of the Effects of Erysiphe graminis DC. on the Growth of Barley · 1962 · compared with barley repeatedly sprayed with lime sulphur

    Opposite direction

96 papers more in this group

See all 100 papers →

inoculation · organism · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.