Abstract
Abstract The peanut is a recent introduction into southern Ontario. In order to develop appropriate production practices, the effects of irrigation, inoculation and N fertilization on yield were investigated. Irrigation and inoculation each increased the yield by about 27%, and the effect of each of these factors was greater in the presence of the other. No significant yield difference (2992 kg/ha on average) was observed between the use of powdered peat or granular inoculants containing the same strains of rhizobia. However, a yield difference was observed between inoculants containing different strains of rhizobia. Nitrogen application at planting time did not increase the yield of uninoculated peanuts, but a split application, applied at planting and 60 days later, increased the yield by 28% over the uninoculated control. Increasing the N application at planting decreased the yield and 100-kernel weight of inoculated peanuts.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation increased peanut yield by about 27%.
- Taxon
- peanut
Arachis hypogaeae0 - Treatment
- Irrigatione1
- Outcome
- yielde1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- about 27%e1
- Setting
- southern Ontarioe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The peanut is a recent introduction into southern Ontario”
e1“Irrigation and inoculation each increased the yield by about 27%”
Claim · model-written summary
Inoculation increased peanut yield by about 27%.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- inoculatione1
- Outcome
- yielde1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- about 27%e1
- Setting
- southern Ontarioe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The peanut is a recent introduction into southern Ontario”
e1“Irrigation and inoculation each increased the yield by about 27%”
Claim · model-written summary
The yield effect of each of irrigation and inoculation was greater when the other was also applied.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- Irrigation and inoculatione1
- Outcome
- the effect of each of these factorse2
- Direction
- greatere2
- Qualifier
- in the presence of the othere2
- Setting
- southern Ontarioe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The peanut is a recent introduction into southern Ontario”
e1“Irrigation and inoculation each increased the yield by about 27%”
e2“the effect of each of these factors was greater in the presence of the other”
Claim · model-written summary
Powdered peat and granular inoculants with the same rhizobia strains gave no significant peanut yield difference.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- powdered peate3
- Interactor
- rhizobiae3symbiont
- Outcome
- yield differencee3
- Direction
- No significante3
- Comparator
- granular inoculantse3
- Setting
- southern Ontarioe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The peanut is a recent introduction into southern Ontario”
e3“No significant yield difference (2992 kg/ha on average) was observed between the use of powdered peat or granular inoculants containing the same strains of rhizobia”
Claim · model-written summary
Inoculants containing different rhizobia strains gave a peanut yield difference.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- inoculants containing different strains of rhizobiae4
- Interactor
- rhizobiae4symbiont
- Outcome
- yield differencee4
- Setting
- southern Ontarioe0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The peanut is a recent introduction into southern Ontario”
e4“However, a yield difference was observed between inoculants containing different strains of rhizobia”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen applied at planting did not increase peanut yield in uninoculated plants.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- Nitrogen application at planting timee5
- Outcome
- yielde5
- Direction
- did not increasee5
- Qualifier
- uninoculatede5
- Setting
- southern Ontarioe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The peanut is a recent introduction into southern Ontario”
e5“Nitrogen application at planting time did not increase the yield of uninoculated peanuts”
Claim · model-written summary
A split nitrogen application at planting and 60 days later increased peanut yield by 28% over the uninoculated control.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- a split application, applied at planting and 60 days latere6
- Outcome
- yielde6
- Direction
- increasede6
- Value
- 28%e6
- Comparator
- uninoculated controle6
- Setting
- southern Ontarioe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The peanut is a recent introduction into southern Ontario”
e6“a split application, applied at planting and 60 days later, increased the yield by 28% over the uninoculated control”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing the nitrogen application at planting decreased the yield and 100-kernel weight of inoculated peanuts.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- Increasing the N application at plantinge7
- Outcome
- yield and 100-kernel weighte7
- Direction
- decreasede7
- Qualifier
- inoculated peanutse7
- Setting
- southern Ontarioe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The peanut is a recent introduction into southern Ontario”
e7“Increasing the N application at planting decreased the yield and 100-kernel weight of inoculated peanuts”
The same questions in other papers
nitrogen · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ
19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 125 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- no effect
141 papers more in this group
See all 145 papers →growing medium · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 15 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →sowing time · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 38 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
54 papers more in this group
See all 58 papers →irrigation · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
167 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
187 papers more in this group
See all 191 papers →inoculation · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
197 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
217 papers more in this group
See all 221 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.