Paper · 2013 · Journal of soil science and plant nutrition

Plant and soil characteristics affected by biofertilizers from rocks and organic matter inoculated with diazotrophic bacteria and fungi that produce chitosan

L.R Berger; N.P Stamford; C.E.R.S Santos; et al.

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
49
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a mixed biofertilizer with phosphate and potash rocks (PK biofertilizer) combined with an earthworm compound inoculated with free living diazotrophic bacteria and Cunninghamella elegans, fungi that produces chitosan, on cowpea nodulation, biomass yield and nutrient uptake.The effects of some chemical attributes from an acidic soil of the Brazilian Northeast were also studied.The treatments were as follows: a) biofertilizer enriched in N by free living diazotrophic bacteria(NPKB), applying crustaceous chitosan (ChCru) at a rate 2 mg mL -1 ; b) NPKB and ChCru at a rate 4 mg mL -1 ; c) NPKB and ChCru at a rate 6 mg mL -1 ; d) NPKB and fungi chitosan (ChFu, 2 mg mL -1 ); e) NPKB+C.elegans (NPKP); f) NPKB without chitosan; g) mineral fertilizers (NPKF); and h) control without NPK fertilizer and chitosan.Biofertilizer treatments increased cowpea nodules biomass, shoot biomass, and total N, P, and K in the shoots.The largest increase was obtained with ChCru, and the highest rate was obtained with NPKP.Furthermore, biofertilizers reduced soil pH and increased the total N and available P and K.These results reveal the potential of rock biofertilizer mixed with earthworm compound inoculated with free living diazotrophic bacteria and C. elegans (fungi chitosan) for plant production and nutrient uptake.The biofertilizer may be an alternative for NPK fertilization that slows the release of nutrients, favoring longterm soil fertility.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizers increased cowpea nodule biomass.

Treatment
Biofertilizer treatmentse0
Outcome
cowpea nodules biomasse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biofertilizer treatments increased cowpea nodules biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–926 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizers increased cowpea shoot biomass.

Treatment
Biofertilizer treatmentse0
Outcome
shoot biomasse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biofertilizer treatments increased cowpea nodules biomass, shoot biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–941 · show in text ↑
t0

“on cowpea nodulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–296 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizers increased total nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium in cowpea shoots.

Treatment
Biofertilizer treatmentse0
Outcome
total N, P, and K in the shootse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biofertilizer treatments increased cowpea nodules biomass, shoot biomass, and total N, P, and K in the shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–978 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ChCru produced the largest increase among treatments.

Treatment
ChCrue0
Outcome
largest increasee0
Direction
largest increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The largest increase was obtained with ChCru”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1023 · show in text ↑
t0

“on cowpea nodulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–296 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPKP yielded the highest rate among treatments.

Treatment
NPKPe0
Outcome
highest ratee0
Direction
highest ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest rate was obtained with NPKP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1068 · show in text ↑
t0

“on cowpea nodulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–296 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizers reduced soil pH.

Treatment
biofertilizerse0
Outcome
soil pHe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biofertilizers reduced soil pH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1112 · show in text ↑
t0

“on cowpea nodulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–296 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizers increased total soil N and available P and K.

Treatment
biofertilizerse0
Outcome
total N and available P and Ke0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biofertilizers reduced soil pH and increased the total N and available P and K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1160 · show in text ↑
t0

“on cowpea nodulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–296 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest the biofertilizer as an alternative to NPK fertilization for slower nutrient release and lasting soil fertility.

Outcome
alternative for NPK fertilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The biofertilizer may be an alternative for NPK fertilization that slows the release of nutrients, favoring longterm soil fertility.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1371–1503 · show in text ↑
t0

“on cowpea nodulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–296 · show in text ↑

inoculation · symbiosis · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

69 papers: 57 positive, 12 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

43 papers: 41 positive, 2 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

inoculation · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

102 papers: 92 positive, 10 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.