Paper · 1994 · HortScience

Screening Fresh-market Tomatoes for Susceptibility to Catfacing with GA3 Foliar Sprays

H.C. Wien; A.D. Turner

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The blossom-end scarring of tomato fruit caused by exposure of the plant to cool weather during ovary formation, commonly termed catfacing, can also be induced by GA 3 foliar sprays. To determine if GA 3 treatment could serve as a cultivar screening tool to identify lines susceptible to the disorder, we compared the catfacing incidence in 14 fresh-market tomato cultivars after GAS sprays and in nontreated controls in two field experiments. In 1 year, removal of the plant's apex was also imposed. GA 3 sprays (22 μ m twice, applied 1 week apart to tomato seedlings ≈5 weeks old) increased catfacing incidence in both years and accentuated cultivar differences in the disorder. Topping did not increase catfacing significantly. The cultivars Valerie, Sunrise, and Basketvee were least affected by catfacing in the experiments, while `Starfire', `New Yorker', and `Olympic' had the highest percentage of catfaced fruit. The GA 3 screening method shows promise for identifying cultivar differences in susceptibility to blossom-end scarring. Chemical name used: gibberellic acid (GA 3 ).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA 3 sprays increased tomato catfacing incidence in both years.

Treatment
GA 3 sprays (22 μ m twice, applied 1 week apart to tomato seedlings ≈5 weeks old)e0
Outcome
catfacing incidencee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
nontreated controlse1
Setting
field experimentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GA 3 sprays (22 μ m twice, applied 1 week apart to tomato seedlings ≈5 weeks old) increased catfacing incidence in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–626 · show in text ↑
e1

“in nontreated controls in two field experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–442 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA 3 sprays accentuated cultivar differences in catfacing.

Treatment
GA 3 sprayse0
Outcome
cultivar differences in the disordere0
Direction
accentuatede0
Comparator
nontreated controlse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GA 3 sprays (22 μ m twice, applied 1 week apart to tomato seedlings ≈5 weeks old) increased catfacing incidence in both years and accentuated cultivar differences in the disorder.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–680 · show in text ↑
e1

“in nontreated controls in two field experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–442 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Topping did not significantly increase catfacing.

Treatment
Toppinge0
Outcome
catfacinge0
Direction
did not increasee0
Comparator
nontreated controlse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Topping did not increase catfacing significantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–730 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–568 · show in text ↑
e2

“in nontreated controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–417 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Valerie, Sunrise and Basketvee were least affected by catfacing.

Material
Valerie, Sunrise, and Basketveee0
Outcome
catfacinge0
Direction
least affectede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cultivars Valerie, Sunrise, and Basketvee were least affected by catfacing in the experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–828 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–373 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Starfire, New Yorker and Olympic had the highest percentage of catfaced fruit.

Material
`Starfire', `New Yorker', and `Olympic'e0
Outcome
percentage of catfaced fruite0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“`Starfire', `New Yorker', and `Olympic' had the highest percentage of catfaced fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–920 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–373 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The GA 3 screening method shows promise for identifying cultivar susceptibility differences.

Outcome
identifying cultivar differences in susceptibility to blossom-end scarringe0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0

“The GA 3 screening method shows promise for identifying cultivar differences in susceptibility to blossom-end scarring.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1041 · show in text ↑

Gibberellic acid · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 10 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

application · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

150 papers: 134 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 134 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

146 papers more in this group

See all 150 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.