Paper · 2000 · Journal of Food Processing and Preservation

EFFECTS of CONTROLLED ATMOSPHERE ON QUALITY of MINIMALLY PROCESSED APPLE (cv. JONAGORED)

ADA MARGARIDA CORREIA NUNES ROCHA; ALCINA MARIA MIRANDA BERNARDO DE MORAIS

5
claims
7
verbatim quotes
21
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

Controlled atmosphere (2% O2+ 4% to 12% CO2) storage was found to be advantageous over air storage in terms of overall preservation of fresh-cut apple (cv. Jonagored). After 3 days, CA-stored apple cubes were firmer, showed better color and higher content of fructose and soluble solids content than air-stored cubes. In relation to color preservation this benefit was increased when CO2 in the atmosphere was increased to 12% CO2. Controlled atmosphere storage showed no advantage over air storage in relation to sensory evaluation of firmness and flavor.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Controlled-atmosphere storage preserved fresh-cut apple better overall than air storage.

Material
Jonagorede0
Treatment
Controlled atmosphere (2% O2+ 4% to 12% CO2) storagee0
Outcome
overall preservatione0
Direction
advantageouse0
Comparator
air storagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Controlled atmosphere (2% O2+ 4% to 12% CO2) storage was found to be advantageous over air storage in terms of overall preservation of fresh-cut apple (cv. Jonagored).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–167 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After three days, controlled-atmosphere apple cubes were firmer and had better color than air-stored cubes.

Treatment
CA-storede0
Outcome
firmer, showed better colore0
Direction
firmere0
Qualifier
After 3 dayse0
Comparator
air-storede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After 3 days, CA-stored apple cubes were firmer, showed better color and higher content of fructose and soluble solids content than air-stored cubes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–317 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After three days, controlled-atmosphere cubes had higher fructose and soluble-solids content.

Treatment
CA-storede0
Outcome
content of fructose and soluble solids contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
air-storede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After 3 days, CA-stored apple cubes were firmer, showed better color and higher content of fructose and soluble solids content than air-stored cubes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–317 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing atmospheric CO2 to 12% improved color preservation.

Treatment
CO2 in the atmosphere was increased to 12% CO2e0
Outcome
color preservatione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In relation to color preservation this benefit was increased when CO2 in the atmosphere was increased to 12% CO2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–431 · show in text ↑
t0

“APPLE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Controlled-atmosphere storage gave no sensory advantage for firmness and flavor over air storage.

Treatment
Controlled atmosphere storagee0
Outcome
sensory evaluation of firmness and flavore0
Direction
no advantagee0
Comparator
air storagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Controlled atmosphere storage showed no advantage over air storage in relation to sensory evaluation of firmness and flavor.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–556 · show in text ↑
t0

“APPLE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑

co2 · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 19 positive, 5 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

storage · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

118 papers: 93 positive, 25 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 93 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

114 papers more in this group

See all 118 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.