Paper · 2000 · Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja

Pre- and postharvest development of carrot yield and quality

Terhi Suojala

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
18
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Storage is a prerequisite for a year-round supply of domestic vegetables.The quality of vegetables after long-term storage is primarily determined during the growing season, and storage conditions can only help to maintain the quality as long as possible.Similarly, the quantity of the marketable yield is determined by conditions during the growing season, and loss during storage is affected by both pre-and postharvest factors.This study aimed to show how the quality and quantity of carrot at harvest and after storage can be better controlled.The main emphasis was on the effects of harvest time on yield, storability and sensory quality, with the aim of optimising the timing of harvest.In addition, development of the carrot plant during the growing season was investigated to characterise the determinants of yield production.The sugar composition of carrot storage root was studied as a possible descriptor of the plant's stage of development.Field experiments were conducted at the Vegetable Experimental Site of the Agricultural Research Centre of Finland and on vegetable farms in 1995-1998.Two cultivars, 'Fontana' and 'Panther', were used, and there were 3-6 harvests in September-October.Despite the large variation in average yield at different growing sites, the yield increase generally ceased in early October.On average, 10-36% of the total yield at the final harvest was produced after early September, when the weather was already less favourable for growth.This suggests that carrot still has considerable potential for yield production late in the growing season.The yield increase during the harvest period can be estimated on the basis of thermal time.Delaying the harvest improved storability up to late September or early October; thereafter storability remained at the same level.Only a prolonged period of frost injured the plants so severely that their storability declined.The effect of harvest time was similar irrespective of cultivar, growing site, year and storage conditions.Weather conditions did not account for the improved storability.It is hypothesised that the concentration of antifungal substances increases at the end of the growing season, which makes the storage roots more resistant to storage pathogens.Healing at 10C for 7 days was effective in decreasing the incidence of infections caused by Mycocentrospora acerina.Changes in sugar content and composition during the harvest period were dependent on the year and growing site, and do not provide evidence for the existence of any developmental stage definable as maturity.Neither do changes during storage

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield increase generally ceased in early October.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Outcome
yield increase generally ceasede0
Qualifier
early Octobere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the yield increase generally ceased in early October”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1328 · show in text ↑
t0

“carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–42 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ten to 36 percent of final yield was produced after early September.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Outcome
total yield at the final harveste0
Value
10-36%e0
Qualifier
after early Septembere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“10-36% of the total yield at the final harvest was produced after early September”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1422 · show in text ↑
t0

“carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–42 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thermal time could estimate yield increase during the harvest period.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Outcome
yield increasee0
Comparator
thermal timee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield increase during the harvest period can be estimated on the basis of thermal time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1587–1677 · show in text ↑
t0

“carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying harvest improved storability until late September or early October.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Treatment
Delaying the harveste0
Outcome
storabilitye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Delaying the harvest improved storability up to late September or early October; thereafter storability remained at the same level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1678–1808 · show in text ↑
t0

“carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prolonged frost injured plants and reduced storability.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Treatment
a prolonged period of froste0
Outcome
storabilitye0
Direction
declinede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Only a prolonged period of frost injured the plants so severely that their storability declined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1809–1904 · show in text ↑
t0

“carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–42 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest-time effects were similar across cultivar, site, year and storage conditions.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Outcome
effect of harvest time was similare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of harvest time was similar irrespective of cultivar, growing site, year and storage conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1905–2011 · show in text ↑
t0

“carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–42 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weather did not explain improved storability.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Outcome
Weather conditions did not account for the improved storabilitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weather conditions did not account for the improved storability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2012–2075 · show in text ↑
t0

“carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–42 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Antifungal substance concentration was hypothesized to rise at season end, raising resistance.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Compound
antifungal substancese0
Outcome
storage roots more resistant to storage pathogense0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It is hypothesised that the concentration of antifungal substances increases at the end of the growing season, which makes the storage roots more resistant to storage pathogens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2076–2252 · show in text ↑
t0

“carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Healing at 10C for 7 days decreased Mycocentrospora acerina infections.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Treatment
Healing at 10C for 7 dayse0
Interactor
Mycocentrospora acerinaMycocentrospora acerinae0pathogen
Outcome
incidence of infections caused by Mycocentrospora acerinae0
Direction
decreasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Mycocentrospora acerina
Mycocentrospora acerina · InteractorBedlan Gerhard, Dr., Institut für Pflanzenschutz, BOKU, Tulln, Österreich. · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Healing at 10C for 7 days was effective in decreasing the incidence of infections caused by Mycocentrospora acerina”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2253–2368 · show in text ↑
t0

“carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–42 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar content and composition changes depended on year and site.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Outcome
sugar content and compositione0
Setting
growing sitee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Changes in sugar content and composition during the harvest period were dependent on the year and growing site”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2369–2479 · show in text ↑
t0

“carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–42 · show in text ↑

cold · quality: postharvest · Daucus carota (carrot)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.