Paper · 1995 · Journal of Food Science

Frozen Carrots Texture and Pectic Compotients as Affected by Low‐Temperature‐Blanching and Quick Freezing

MICHIKO FUCHIGAMI; KOICHI MIYAZAKI; NORIKO HYAKUMOTO

13
claims
19
verbatim quotes
94
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Carrots preheated for 2 hr at 60°C and then cooked became firmer than raw or cooked carrots. After preheating, the amount of high methoxyl pectin decreased, and low methoxyl pectin increased. Firmness of carrots decreased through freezing then thawing, but preheated carrots retained firmer texture than those blanched in boiling water. Quick‐freezing resulted in better texture than slow‐freezing. Loss in texture was accompanied by release of pectin. Slow‐freezing accelerated release of pectin as compared to quick‐freezing. Preheated carrots were slower in release of pectin. The degree of esterification of pectin substances in raw carrots decreased during preheating, freezing and thawing. Cell damage in quick frozen carrots was slight. Optimum preheating occurred with 30 min at 60°C or 5 min at 70°C. Preheating and then quick freezing were effective in improving texture of frozen carrots.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preheating for two hours at 60°C before cooking made carrots firmer than raw or cooked carrots.

Taxon
CarrotsDaucus carotae0
Treatment
preheated for 2 hr at 60°C and then cookede0
Outcome
firmere0
Direction
firmere0
Comparator
raw or cooked carrotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Carrots preheated for 2 hr at 60°C and then cooked became firmer than raw or cooked carrots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preheating reduced high methoxyl pectin.

Treatment
preheatinge0
Outcome
amount of high methoxyl pectine0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“After preheating, the amount of high methoxyl pectin decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–164 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preheating increased low methoxyl pectin.

Taxon
CarrotsDaucus carotat0
Treatment
preheatinge1
Outcome
low methoxyl pectine0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“low methoxyl pectin increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 170–199 · show in text ↑
e1

“After preheating”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–118 · show in text ↑
t0

“Carrots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 7–14 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Freezing and thawing reduced carrot firmness.

Taxon
carrotsDaucus carotae0
Treatment
freezing then thawinge0
Outcome
Firmnesse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Firmness of carrots decreased through freezing then thawing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–260 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preheated carrots retained firmer texture than carrots blanched in boiling water.

Taxon
carrotsDaucus carotae0
Treatment
preheatede0
Outcome
texturee0
Direction
firmere0
Comparator
blanched in boiling watere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“preheated carrots retained firmer texture than those blanched in boiling water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–344 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Quick freezing gave better texture than slow freezing.

Taxon
CarrotsDaucus carotat0
Treatment
Quick‐freezinge0
Outcome
texturee0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
slow‐freezinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Quick‐freezing resulted in better texture than slow‐freezing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–407 · show in text ↑
t0

“Carrots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 7–14 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Texture loss accompanied pectin release.

Taxon
CarrotsDaucus carotat0
Compound
pectine0
Outcome
Loss in texturee0
Direction
Losse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Loss in texture was accompanied by release of pectin.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 408–461 · show in text ↑
t0

“Carrots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 7–14 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Slow freezing accelerated pectin release compared with quick freezing.

Taxon
CarrotsDaucus carotat0
Treatment
Slow‐freezinge0
Outcome
release of pectine0
Direction
acceleratede0
Comparator
quick‐freezinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Slow‐freezing accelerated release of pectin as compared to quick‐freezing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–536 · show in text ↑
t0

“Carrots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 7–14 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preheated carrots released pectin more slowly.

Taxon
carrotsDaucus carotae0
Treatment
Preheatede0
Outcome
release of pectine0
Direction
slowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Preheated carrots were slower in release of pectin.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–588 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preheating, freezing and thawing lowered pectin esterification degree.

Taxon
carrotsDaucus carotae0
Treatment
preheating, freezing and thawinge0
Outcome
degree of esterification of pectin substancese0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
raw carrotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The degree of esterification of pectin substances in raw carrots decreased during preheating, freezing and thawing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–704 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Quick frozen carrots had slight cell damage.

Taxon
carrotsDaucus carotae0
Outcome
Cell damagee0
Qualifier
slighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cell damage in quick frozen carrots was slight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–752 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimal preheating was 30 minutes at 60°C or five minutes at 70°C.

Taxon
CarrotsDaucus carotat0
Outcome
Optimum preheatinge0
Value
30 min at 60°C or 5 min at 70°Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Optimum preheating occurred with 30 min at 60°C or 5 min at 70°C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–818 · show in text ↑
t0

“Carrots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 7–14 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preheating followed by quick freezing improved frozen carrot texture.

Taxon
carrotsDaucus carotae0
Treatment
Preheating and then quick freezinge0
Outcome
texturee0
Direction
improvinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Preheating and then quick freezing were effective in improving texture of frozen carrots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–908 · show in text ↑

cold · quality: postharvest · Daucus carota (carrot)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.