Paper · 2005 · Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection

Transmission of seed-borne infection of chilli byBurkholderia solanacearumand effect of biological seed treatment on disease incidence

S. Umesha; R. Kavitha; H. S. Shetty

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
11
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract A survey of chilli fields in the state of Karnataka, India, showed the presence of bacterial wilt disease in important chilli growing regions. The disease incidence ranged from 26 – 32%. The pathogen was isolated from infected plant material and seeds. Infected plant material showed the release of milky white bacterial ooze. Burkholderia solanacearum was detected from chilli seeds by liquid assay and its identity was confirmed by biochemical tests, hypersensitive reaction and pathogenicity tests. Seed transmission of the pathogen up to 45% was observed in seeds artificially infested with the pathogen. Among different tissues of the seed, endosperm showed the presence of the pathogen. Biological seed treatment with antagonistic Pseudomonas fluorescens significantly (p = 0.05) improved the seed quality parameters under laboratory conditions and drastically reduced the bacterial wilt incidence under field conditions. Seed-borne nature, transmission and effect of Pseudomonas fluorescens in both the forms of pure culture and formulation on seed quality parameters and bacterial wilt incidence are discussed in the present work.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial wilt was found in surveyed chilli fields in Karnataka.

Taxon
chillie0
Interactor
Burkholderia solanacearumt0pathogen
Outcome
presence of bacterial wilt diseasee0
Setting
Karnataka, Indiae0

Verbatim

e0

“A survey of chilli fields in the state of Karnataka, India, showed the presence of bacterial wilt disease in important chilli growing regions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–150 · show in text ↑
t0

“Burkholderia solanacearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial wilt incidence ranged from 26 to 32% in surveyed chilli fields.

Taxon
chillit0
Interactor
Burkholderia solanacearumt0pathogen
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Value
26 – 32%e0

Verbatim

e0

“The disease incidence ranged from 26 – 32%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 152–194 · show in text ↑
t0

“chilli byBurkholderia solanacearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The pathogen was recovered from infected chilli material and seeds.

Taxon
chillit0
Organ / stage
seedse0
Interactor
Burkholderia solanacearumt0pathogen
Outcome
pathogen was isolated from infected plant material and seedse0

Verbatim

e0

“The pathogen was isolated from infected plant material and seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–260 · show in text ↑
t0

“chilli byBurkholderia solanacearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infected chilli tissue released milky white bacterial ooze.

Taxon
chillit0
Interactor
Burkholderia solanacearumt0pathogen
Outcome
release of milky white bacterial oozee0

Verbatim

e0

“Infected plant material showed the release of milky white bacterial ooze”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 262–334 · show in text ↑
t0

“chilli byBurkholderia solanacearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–74 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Burkholderia solanacearum was detected in chilli seeds and its identity confirmed.

Taxon
chillie0
Organ / stage
seedse0
Interactor
Burkholderia solanacearume0pathogen
Outcome
Burkholderia solanacearum was detected from chilli seedse0
Comparator
biochemical tests, hypersensitive reaction and pathogenicity testse0

Not reportedValue

Verbatim

e0

“Burkholderia solanacearum was detected from chilli seeds by liquid assay and its identity was confirmed by biochemical tests, hypersensitive reaction and pathogenicity tests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–509 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Artificially infested chilli seeds transmitted the pathogen at up to 45%.

Taxon
chillit0
Organ / stage
seedse0
Interactor
Burkholderia solanacearumt0pathogen
Outcome
Seed transmission of the pathogene0
Value
up to 45%e0

Verbatim

e0

“Seed transmission of the pathogen up to 45% was observed in seeds artificially infested with the pathogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–616 · show in text ↑
t0

“chilli byBurkholderia solanacearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The pathogen was present in chilli seed endosperm.

Taxon
chillit0
Organ / stage
endosperme0
Interactor
Burkholderia solanacearumt0pathogen
Outcome
presence of the pathogene0

Verbatim

e0

“Among different tissues of the seed, endosperm showed the presence of the pathogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–700 · show in text ↑
t0

“chilli byBurkholderia solanacearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas fluorescens seed treatment significantly improved chilli seed quality in the laboratory.

Taxon
chillit0
Treatment
Biological seed treatment with antagonistic Pseudomonas fluorescense0
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
seed quality parameterse0
Direction
improvede0
Setting
laboratory conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biological seed treatment with antagonistic Pseudomonas fluorescens significantly (p = 0.05) improved the seed quality parameters under laboratory conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–859 · show in text ↑
t0

“chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas fluorescens seed treatment sharply reduced bacterial wilt incidence in the field.

Taxon
chillit0
Treatment
Biological seed treatment with antagonistic Pseudomonas fluorescense0
Interactor
Burkholderia solanacearumt0pathogen
Second interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
bacterial wilt incidencee0
Direction
reducede0
Setting
field conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · Second interactorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biological seed treatment with antagonistic Pseudomonas fluorescens significantly (p = 0.05) improved the seed quality parameters under laboratory conditions and drastically reduced the bacterial wilt incidence under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–935 · show in text ↑
t0

“chilli byBurkholderia solanacearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–74 · show in text ↑

Pseudomonas fluorescens · disease · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

seed treatment · quality: grain · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

seed treatment · disease · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.