Paper · 2013 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Effect of Nitrogen Rates and Application Time on Sugarcane Yield and Quality

Josh Lofton; Brenda Tubaña

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
25
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Current sugarcane nitrogen (N) rate recommendations are based of crop age and soil type. Fertilization is typically done up to two months prior to rapid N uptake by sugarcane crop. This study was established to evaluate the effect of N rate and application timing on sugarcane yield and quality. Treatments included four different N rates (0, 45, 90, and 135 kg N ha−1) and four different application times (mid-April, late-April, mid-May, and late-May) arranged in a split-plot design with application time as the main plot and N rate as the sub-plot. Two of three site-years showed a significant positive effect of N rate on sugarcane yield. Further, the critical N rates range from 40 to 60 kg N ha−1 for responsive years, which is lower than current N rate recommendations. Results indicated that N fertilization could be delayed to later in the growing season in 5 of 6 s

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher nitrogen rates significantly increased sugarcane yield in two of three site years.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
N ratee0
Outcome
sugarcane yielde0
Direction
positivee0
Qualifier
Two of three site-yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Two of three site-years showed a significant positive effect of N rate on sugarcane yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–643 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Critical nitrogen rates were 40 to 60 kg N ha−1 in responsive years.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Outcome
critical N ratese0
Value
40 to 60 kg N ha−1e0
Qualifier
responsive yearse0

Verbatim

e0

“critical N rates range from 40 to 60 kg N ha−1 for responsive years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–724 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Critical nitrogen rates were lower than current recommendations.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Outcome
critical N ratese1
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
current N rate recommendationse0

Verbatim

e0

“which is lower than current N rate recommendations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–776 · show in text ↑
e1

“critical N rates range from 40 to 60 kg N ha−1 for responsive years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–724 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–58 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization could be delayed later in the sugarcane growing season in five of six cases.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Outcome
N fertilization could be delayed to later in the growing seasone0
Value
5 of 6e0

Verbatim

e0

“N fertilization could be delayed to later in the growing season in 5 of 6 s”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–876 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–58 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

137 papers: 118 positive, 19 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

133 papers more in this group

See all 137 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.