Paper · 1990 · New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research

Effects of chloride fertilisers on ionic composition and cation‐anion balance and ratio of fodder beet ( Beta vulgaris L.) grown under field conditions

S. S. Magat; K. M. Goh

10
claims
22
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract Effects of chloride (Cl) fertilisers (NaCl and KCl) on the ionic composition (K + , Ca 2+ , Mg 2+ , Na + , NH + 4 , H 2 PO ‐ 4 , SO 2‐ 4 , Cl ‐ , NO ‐ 3 ), and cation‐anion (C‐A) balance and ratio of fodder beet ( Beta vulgaris L.) were studied under field conditions on two New Zealand soils (Templeton siltloam, Dystic Ustochrept; and Wakanui silt loam, Aquic Eutrochrept). In both soils, at mid season and final harvest, Cl application at 360 kg/ha (590 kg NaCl and 758 kg KCl) increased root K + and Cl ‐ , and Cl ‐ in tops consistently but not K + in tops. The sum of cations (SC) and C‐A remained unaffected whereas the sum of anions (SA) increased. With increasing rates of NaCl, root cations were not significantly affected whereas topsand root Cl ‐ increased linearly, indicating that Cl ‐ was easily absorbed and accumulated in both tops and roots of the beet crop. The beet crop maintained constant SC and C‐A balance within the range of 0–1180 kg NaCl/ha applied, but the SA increased linearly with increasing rates of NaCl applied. The ratio (RCA) of SC and SA provided a more consistent and reliable index of yield compared with C‐A balance. Beets with low RCA were apparently associated with high fresh and dry root yields and fresh sugar yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chloride application increased root potassium and chloride.

Taxon
fodder beett0
Treatment
Cl application at 360 kg/hae0
Outcome
root K + and Cl ‐e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Cl application at 360 kg/ha (590 kg NaCl and 758 kg KCl) increased root K + and Cl ‐”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–517 · show in text ↑
t0

“fodder beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chloride application increased chloride in beet tops but not potassium.

Taxon
fodder beett0
Treatment
Cl application at 360 kg/hae1
Outcome
Cl ‐ in topse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Cl ‐ in tops consistently but not K + in tops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–569 · show in text ↑
t0

“fodder beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cl application at 360 kg/ha (590 kg NaCl and 758 kg KCl) increased root K + and Cl ‐”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–517 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sum of cations and cation–anion balance remained unaffected by chloride application.

Taxon
fodder beett0
Treatment
Cl applicatione1
Outcome
sum of cations (SC) and C‐Ae0
Direction
remained unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The sum of cations (SC) and C‐A remained unaffected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–622 · show in text ↑
t0

“fodder beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cl application at 360 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–460 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sum of anions increased with chloride application.

Taxon
fodder beett0
Treatment
Cl applicatione1
Outcome
sum of anions (SA)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the sum of anions (SA) increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–663 · show in text ↑
t0

“fodder beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cl application at 360 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–460 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing NaCl rates did not significantly affect root cations.

Taxon
fodder beett0
Treatment
increasing rates of NaCle0
Outcome
root cationse0
Direction
not significantly affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“With increasing rates of NaCl, root cations were not significantly affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–740 · show in text ↑
t0

“fodder beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing NaCl rates linearly increased chloride in beet tops and roots.

Taxon
fodder beett0
Treatment
increasing rates of NaCle1
Outcome
topsand root Cl ‐e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“topsand root Cl ‐ increased linearly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–785 · show in text ↑
t0

“fodder beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“With increasing rates of NaCl”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–694 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beets maintained constant cation sum and cation–anion balance across the tested NaCl range.

Outcome
SC and C‐A balancee0
Direction
constante0
Qualifier
0–1180 kg NaCl/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The beet crop maintained constant SC and C‐A balance within the range of 0–1180 kg NaCl/ha applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–983 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Anion sum rose linearly as NaCl rate rose.

Taxon
fodder beett0
Treatment
increasing rates of NaCle0
Outcome
SAe0
Direction
increasede0

Verbatim

e0

“the SA increased linearly with increasing rates of NaCl applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1052 · show in text ↑
t0

“fodder beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–102 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cation to anion ratio was a more reliable yield index than cation–anion balance.

Taxon
fodder beett0
Outcome
index of yielde0
Direction
more consistent and reliablee0
Comparator
C‐A balancee0

Verbatim

e0

“The ratio (RCA) of SC and SA provided a more consistent and reliable index of yield compared with C‐A balance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1163 · show in text ↑
t0

“fodder beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–102 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low cation to anion ratio was associated with high fresh and dry root yields and fresh sugar yield.

Taxon
BeetsBeta vulgarise0
Outcome
fresh and dry root yields and fresh sugar yielde0
Direction
highe0
Qualifier
low RCAe0
Comparator
RCAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Beets with low RCA were apparently associated with high fresh and dry root yields and fresh sugar yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1268 · show in text ↑

sodium chloride · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.