Paper · 2014 · Arab Universities Journal of Agricultural Sciences

DOES SILICON ALLEVIATE the INJURIES of NITROGEN DEFICIENCY and FENOXAPROP–P–ETHYL HERBICIDE in WHEAT (Triticum aestivum, L.)?

Saudy H. S.; Manal Mubarak

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Si application alleviates influence of some abiotic stresses on crop plants. Meanwhile, scarce information is avaiable about the significance of Si for helping the plants to overcome the injuries of N deficiency and herbicides pressure. Thus, two–year 2–field experiments were carried out in wheat. Experiment I involved three Si concentrations (Si0ppm, Si250ppm and Si500ppm) and two N levels(N100% and N50%). Experiment II examined four combinations of fenoxaprop–p–ethyl and Si: fenoxaprop–p–ethyl+Si250ppm and fenoxaprop–p–ethyl+Si500ppm (each either in sequence or in tank mixture), fenoxaprop–p–ethyl alone, hand weeding and weedy check. Under N deficiency (N50%), Si500ppm increased plant height as compared to the control. No significant differences in SPAD values were detected amongst Si concentrations under each of the two tested N levels. Si can partially alleviate negative N deficiency effect on wheat yield, causing its increase to level obtained under normal N supply. Si has no effect on weed biomass when applied with fenoxaprop–p–ethyl either in sequence or in tank mixing. The most promising treatment for maximizing wheat grain yield was the application of 100 kg N ha–1 (N50%) x fenoxaprop–p–ethyl+Si250ppm in sequence", which also, in the same time, means reducing both cost of crop production and environment pollution.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under nitrogen deficiency, Si500ppm increased wheat height versus control.

Treatment
Si500ppme0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
N deficiency (N50%)e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under N deficiency (N50%), Si500ppm increased plant height as compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–730 · show in text ↑
e1

“in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–297 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SPAD values did not differ significantly among silicon concentrations at either nitrogen level.

Treatment
Si concentrationse0
Outcome
SPAD valuese0
Direction
No significant differencese0
Comparator
Si concentrationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No significant differences in SPAD values were detected amongst Si concentrations under each of the two tested N levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–851 · show in text ↑
e1

“in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–297 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon partially alleviated nitrogen-deficiency effects on wheat yield, raising it to the normal nitrogen level.

Treatment
Sie0
Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
normal N supplye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Si can partially alleviate negative N deficiency effect on wheat yield, causing its increase to level obtained under normal N supply.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–985 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon with fenoxaprop–p–ethyl had no effect on weed biomass whether sequentially applied or tank mixed.

Treatment
Sie0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed biomasse0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Si has no effect on weed biomass when applied with fenoxaprop–p–ethyl either in sequence or in tank mixing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1093 · show in text ↑
e1

“in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–297 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identified 100 kg N ha–1 plus sequential fenoxaprop–p–ethyl and Si250ppm as the most promising yield treatment.

Treatment
100 kg N ha–1 (N50%) x fenoxaprop–p–ethyl+Si250ppm in sequencee0
Outcome
maximizing wheat grain yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The most promising treatment for maximizing wheat grain yield was the application of 100 kg N ha–1 (N50%) x fenoxaprop–p–ethyl+Si250ppm in sequence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1241 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The recommended treatment was interpreted to reduce production cost and environmental pollution.

Outcome
cost of crop production and environment pollutione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reducing both cost of crop production and environment pollution.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1344 · show in text ↑
e1

“in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–297 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

90 papers: 85 positive, 5 negative or no effect

84 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

86 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

silicon atom · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 24 positive, 1 negative or no effect

24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

silicon atom · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.