Paper · 2002 · Integrative and Comparative Biology

Investigation of Four Classes of Non-nodulating White Sweetclover (Melilotus alba annua Desr.) Mutants and Their Responses to Arbuscular-Mycorrhizal Fungi

M. R. Lum

2
claims
3
verbatim quotes
20
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The nitrogen-fixing symbiosis between Rhizobiaceae and legumes is one of the best-studied interactions established between prokaryotes and eukaryotes. The plant develops root nodules in which the bacteria are housed, and atmospheric nitrogen is fixed into ammonia by the rhizobia and made available to the plant in exchange for carbon compounds. It has been hypothesized that this symbiosis evolved from the more ancient arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) symbiosis, in which the fungus associates with roots and aids the plant in the absorption of mineral nutrients, particularly phosphate. Support comes from several fronts: 1) legume mutants where Nod(-) and Myc(-) co-segregate, and 2) the fact that various early nodulin (ENOD) genes are expressed in legume AM. Both strongly argue for the idea that the signal transduction pathways between the two symbioses are conserved. We have analyzed the responses of four classes of non-nodulating Melilotus alba (white sweetclover) mutants to Glomus intraradices (the mycorrhizal symbiont) to investigate how Nod(-) mutations affect the establishment of this symbiosis. We also re-examined the root hair responses of the non-nodulating mutants to Sinorhizobium meliloti (the nitrogen-fixing symbiont). Of the four classes, several sweetclover sym mutants are both Nod(-) and Myc(-). In an attempt to decipher the relationship between nodulation and mycorrhiza formation, we also performed co-inoculation experiments with mutant rhizobia and Glomus intraradices on Medicago sativa, a close relative of M. alba. Even though sulfated Nod factor was supplied by some of the bacterial mutants, the fungus did not complement symbiotically defective rhizobia for nodulation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Several sweetclover sym mutants lacked both nodulation and mycorrhization.

Taxon
sweetclovere0
Material
sweetclover sym mutantse0
Outcome
both Nod(-) and Myc(-)e0

Verbatim

e0

“Of the four classes, several sweetclover sym mutants are both Nod(-) and Myc(-).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1322 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus intraradices did not complement defective rhizobia for Medicago sativa nodulation despite sulfated Nod factor.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
co-inoculation experiments with mutant rhizobia and Glomus intraradicese1
Interactor
rhizobiae0symbiont
Second interactor
Glomus intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese1symbiont
Outcome
did not complement symbiotically defective rhizobia for nodulatione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Even though sulfated Nod factor was supplied by some of the bacterial mutants, the fungus did not complement symbiotically defective rhizobia for nodulation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1550–1707 · show in text ↑
e1

“co-inoculation experiments with mutant rhizobia and Glomus intraradices on Medicago sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1429–1519 · show in text ↑

loss of function · symbiosis · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 5 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

inoculation · symbiosis · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

57 papers: 49 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.