Paper · 2010 · African Journal of Agricultural Research

Screening of barley genotypes for drought tolerance by agro-physiological traits in field condition.

B Vaezi; Vahid Bavei; Behrouz Shiran

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
58
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In a two-year experiment, 11 barley genotypes from ICARDA and one landrace from Iran were tested under optimum and drought stress conditions. Phenological and physiological traits such as relative water content (RWC), osmotic adjustment (OA), stay-green (SG), plant height (PLH), days to heading (DHE), days to maturity (DMA) and seed indexes such as 1000-grain weight (TGW), number of grain per spike (G/S) and grain yield (GY) were evaluated. Variations were observed in DHE, DMA, G/S, TGW, PLH, RWC, OA and length of stay-green period. DHE and DMA were the phenological traits that most influenced yield during water stress conditions. Negative correlation was observed under water stress between yield, DHE, and DMA under drought stress. The average reduction in yield caused by drought stress was 28.05%. Under drought stress condition, TGW, G/S, RWC and SG correlated positively with yield, while under both stress conditions, the correlation of yield and PLH was lower than other correlations. Yield was significantly correlated with osmotic adjustment (P < 0.05). Among the genotypes, L6 possessed the greatest OA capacity, and L3, L8, L9 and L10 the smallest. The genotypes that show higher OA capacities therefore, are those that are most drought tolerant. Genotype L6 performed well under water stress condition as it attained a reasonable plant height, precocity, RWC, OA and SG, gave higher grain yields and seed index as compared with other genotypes. Key words: Barley, drought stress, phenological and physiological traits, yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress reduced barley yield by an average of 28.05%.

Treatment
drought stresse1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
reductione1
Value
28.05%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The average reduction in yield caused by drought stress was 28.05%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–808 · show in text ↑
t0

“Screening of barley genotypes for drought tolerance by agro-physiological traits in field condition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–100 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Days to heading and days to maturity were the phenological traits that most influenced barley yield under water stress.

Treatment
water stress conditionse2
Outcome
yielde2
Qualifier
DHE and DMA were the phenological traits that most influencede2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“DHE and DMA were the phenological traits that most influenced yield during water stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 539–637 · show in text ↑
t0

“Screening of barley genotypes for drought tolerance by agro-physiological traits in field condition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–100 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield was negatively correlated with DHE and DMA under drought stress in barley.

Treatment
drought stresse3
Outcome
yield, DHE, and DMAe3
Direction
Negative correlatione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Negative correlation was observed under water stress between yield, DHE, and DMA under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–740 · show in text ↑
t0

“Screening of barley genotypes for drought tolerance by agro-physiological traits in field condition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–100 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought stress, TGW, G/S and RWC correlated positively with barley yield.

Treatment
Under drought stress conditione4
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
correlated positivelye4
Qualifier
TGW, G/S, RWCe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Under drought stress condition, TGW, G/S, RWC and SG correlated positively with yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–895 · show in text ↑
t0

“Screening of barley genotypes for drought tolerance by agro-physiological traits in field condition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–100 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought stress, stay-green correlated positively with barley yield.

Treatment
Under drought stress conditione4
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
correlated positivelye4
Qualifier
SGe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Under drought stress condition, TGW, G/S, RWC and SG correlated positively with yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–895 · show in text ↑
t0

“Screening of barley genotypes for drought tolerance by agro-physiological traits in field condition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–100 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under both stress conditions, the correlation of yield with PLH and PLH was lower than other correlations in barley.

Treatment
both stress conditionse5
Outcome
yield and PLHe5
Direction
lowere5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“while under both stress conditions, the correlation of yield and PLH was lower than other correlations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–999 · show in text ↑
t0

“Screening of barley genotypes for drought tolerance by agro-physiological traits in field condition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–100 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield was significantly correlated with osmotic adjustment in barley.

Outcome
Yield was significantly correlated with osmotic adjustmente6
Value
P < 0.05e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Yield was significantly correlated with osmotic adjustment (P < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1070 · show in text ↑
t0

“Screening of barley genotypes for drought tolerance by agro-physiological traits in field condition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–100 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype L6 had the greatest osmotic adjustment capacity among the barley genotypes.

Material
L6e7
Outcome
OA capacitye7
Qualifier
the greateste7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Among the genotypes, L6 possessed the greatest OA capacity, and L3, L8, L9 and L10 the smallest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1167 · show in text ↑
t0

“Screening of barley genotypes for drought tolerance by agro-physiological traits in field condition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–100 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypes L3, L8, L9 and L10 had the smallest osmotic adjustment capacity among the barley genotypes.

Material
L3, L8, L9 and L10e7
Outcome
OA capacitye7
Qualifier
the smalleste7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Among the genotypes, L6 possessed the greatest OA capacity, and L3, L8, L9 and L10 the smallest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1167 · show in text ↑
t0

“Screening of barley genotypes for drought tolerance by agro-physiological traits in field condition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype L6 gave higher grain yields and seed index than other genotypes under water stress.

Material
L6e0
Treatment
water stress conditione0
Outcome
grain yields and seed indexe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other genotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genotype L6 performed well under water stress condition as it attained a reasonable plant height, precocity, RWC, OA and SG, gave higher grain yields and seed index as compared with other genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1464 · show in text ↑
t0

“Screening of barley genotypes for drought tolerance by agro-physiological traits in field condition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–100 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype L6 attained a reasonable plant height, precocity and RWC under water stress.

Material
L6e0
Outcome
plant height, precocity, RWCe0
Qualifier
reasonablee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genotype L6 performed well under water stress condition as it attained a reasonable plant height, precocity, RWC, OA and SG, gave higher grain yields and seed index as compared with other genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1464 · show in text ↑
t0

“Screening of barley genotypes for drought tolerance by agro-physiological traits in field condition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–100 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype L6 attained a reasonable osmotic adjustment and stay-green under water stress.

Material
L6e0
Outcome
OA and SGe0
Qualifier
reasonablee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genotype L6 performed well under water stress condition as it attained a reasonable plant height, precocity, RWC, OA and SG, gave higher grain yields and seed index as compared with other genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1464 · show in text ↑
t0

“Screening of barley genotypes for drought tolerance by agro-physiological traits in field condition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–100 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variations were observed in days to heading, days to maturity and G/S among barley genotypes.

Outcome
DHE, DMA, G/Se1
Qualifier
Variations were observede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Variations were observed in DHE, DMA, G/S, TGW, PLH, RWC, OA and length of stay-green period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 445–537 · show in text ↑
t0

“Screening of barley genotypes for drought tolerance by agro-physiological traits in field condition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–100 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variations were observed in TGW, PLH and RWC among barley genotypes.

Outcome
TGW, PLH, RWCe1
Qualifier
Variations were observede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Variations were observed in DHE, DMA, G/S, TGW, PLH, RWC, OA and length of stay-green period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 445–537 · show in text ↑
t0

“Screening of barley genotypes for drought tolerance by agro-physiological traits in field condition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–100 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variations were observed in osmotic adjustment and length of stay-green period among barley genotypes.

Outcome
OA and length of stay-green periode1
Qualifier
Variations were observede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Variations were observed in DHE, DMA, G/S, TGW, PLH, RWC, OA and length of stay-green period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 445–537 · show in text ↑
t0

“Screening of barley genotypes for drought tolerance by agro-physiological traits in field condition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–100 · show in text ↑

drought · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

102 papers: 9 positive, 93 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.