Paper · 1996 · New Phytologist

Superoxide dismutase activity in arbuscular mycorrhizal Lactuca sativa plants subjected to drought stress

J. M. RUIZ‐LOZANO; R. AZCÓN; J. M. PALMA

16
claims
34
verbatim quotes
126
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

summary Total superoxide dismutase (SOD; EC 1.15.1.1) activity, SOD specific activity and changes in the SOD isoenzymatic pattern were determined in roots and shoots of plants of Lactuca sativa L. cv. Romana colonized by the arbuscular mycorrhiza (AM) fungi Glomus mosseae (Nicol. & Gerd.) Gerd. & Trappe or Glomus deserticola (Trappe, Bloss & Menge), and in non‐mycorrhizal phosphorus‐fertilized controls. Lettuce plants were grown under well watered or drought conditions and were harvested 5 wk or 8 wk after planting. Previous studies have reported that mechanisms that decrease oxidative stress can play an important role in drought tolerance of plants. However, there is little information on either the role of superoxide dismutase in the symbiosis between AM fungi and plants, or about the response at biochemical level of the mycorrhizal symbiosis to drought stress. In our experimental conditions the protein concentration in shoots decreased in all plants as a result of drought stress (except in plants colonized by Glomus mosseae after 8 wk of growth). In general, shoots of mycorrhizal plants had more protein than did shoots of P‐fertilized plants, G. deserticola being the treatment with the highest protein concentration. However, in roots the protein concentrations did not vary as clearly as in shoots. The SOD specific activity of 5‐wk‐old plants under stress conditions was considerably higher in shoots and roots of mycorrhizal than in those of P‐fertilized plants, showing increases which ranged from 99% in G. mosseae‐mycorrhizas to 150% in G. deserticola ‐mycorrhizas. Under well watered conditions shoots showed no significant differences in SOD specific activity between treatments, whereas in roots mycorrhizal colonization increased it by 16–18 %. Drought stress increased SOD activity of shoots of control plants by 17%, and that of shoots of plants colonized by G. mosseae and G. deserticola by 93 % and 128 %, respectively. Similar results were also found for roots, regardless of the plant age. The increased SOD activity in mycorrhizal plants was not related to the nutritional status of the plants. Instead, it could be ascribed to a direct mechanism of AM association in response to drought exposure. However, no changes in the SOD isozyme pattern as a consequence of mycorrhizal association or water treatment were observed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced shoot protein concentration except in eight-week G. mosseae plants.

Taxon
Lactuca sativaLactuca sativat0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
protein concentration in shootse0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
except in plants colonized by Glomus mosseae after 8 wk of growthe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the protein concentration in shoots decreased in all plants as a result of drought stress (except in plants colonized by Glomus mosseae after 8 wk of growth)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–1064 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lactuca sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal shoots generally had more protein than phosphorus-fertilized controls.

Taxon
Lactuca sativaLactuca sativat0
Treatment
mycorrhizal plantse0
Outcome
proteine0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
P‐fertilized plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoots of mycorrhizal plants had more protein than did shoots of P‐fertilized plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1162 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lactuca sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G. deserticola gave the highest shoot protein concentration.

Taxon
Lactuca sativaLactuca sativat0
Treatment
G. deserticolae0
Interactor
G. deserticolaSeptoglomus deserticolae0symbiont
Outcome
protein concentratione0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“G. deserticola being the treatment with the highest protein concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1237 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lactuca sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root protein concentrations varied less clearly than shoot concentrations.

Taxon
Lactuca sativaLactuca sativat0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Outcome
protein concentrationse0
Direction
did not vary as clearlye0
Comparator
shootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in roots the protein concentrations did not vary as clearly as in shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1320 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lactuca sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought-stressed five-week G. mosseae plants had 99% higher SOD specific activity than fertilized controls.

Taxon
Lactuca sativaLactuca sativat0
Organ / stage
shoots and rootse0
Treatment
G. mosseae‐mycorrhizase0
Interactor
G. mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee0symbiont
Outcome
SOD specific activitye0
Direction
highere0
Value
99%e0
Comparator
P‐fertilized plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The SOD specific activity of 5‐wk‐old plants under stress conditions was considerably higher in shoots and roots of mycorrhizal than in those of P‐fertilized plants, showing increases which ranged from 99% in G. mosseae‐mycorrhizas to 150% in G. deserticola ‐mycorrhizas.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1593 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lactuca sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought-stressed five-week G. deserticola plants had 150% higher SOD specific activity than fertilized controls.

Taxon
Lactuca sativaLactuca sativat0
Organ / stage
shoots and rootse0
Treatment
G. deserticola ‐mycorrhizase0
Interactor
G. deserticolaSeptoglomus deserticolae0symbiont
Outcome
SOD specific activitye0
Direction
highere0
Value
150%e0
Comparator
P‐fertilized plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The SOD specific activity of 5‐wk‐old plants under stress conditions was considerably higher in shoots and roots of mycorrhizal than in those of P‐fertilized plants, showing increases which ranged from 99% in G. mosseae‐mycorrhizas to 150% in G. deserticola ‐mycorrhizas.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1593 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lactuca sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Well-watered shoots had no significant SOD specific activity difference among treatments.

Taxon
Lactuca sativaLactuca sativat0
Organ / stage
shootse0
Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
SOD specific activitye0
Direction
no significant differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under well watered conditions shoots showed no significant differences in SOD specific activity between treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1594–1708 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lactuca sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal colonization raised well-watered root SOD specific activity by 16–18 %.

Taxon
Lactuca sativaLactuca sativat0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
mycorrhizal colonizatione0
Outcome
SOD specific activitye1
Direction
increasede0
Value
16–18 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in roots mycorrhizal colonization increased it by 16–18 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1718–1775 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lactuca sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–70 · show in text ↑
e1

“The SOD specific activity of 5‐wk‐old plants under stress conditions was considerably higher in shoots and roots of mycorrhizal than in those of P‐fertilized plants, showing increases which ranged from 99% in G. mosseae‐mycorrhizas to 150% in G. deserticola ‐mycorrhizas.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1593 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought raised shoot SOD activity in controls by 17%.

Taxon
Lactuca sativaLactuca sativat0
Organ / stage
shootse0
Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
SOD activitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
17%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stress increased SOD activity of shoots of control plants by 17%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1777–1849 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lactuca sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought raised shoot SOD activity in G. mosseae plants by 93 %.

Taxon
Lactuca sativaLactuca sativat0
Organ / stage
shootse0
Treatment
Drought stresse0
Interactor
G. mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee0symbiont
Outcome
SOD activitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
93 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stress increased SOD activity of shoots of control plants by 17%, and that of shoots of plants colonized by G. mosseae and G. deserticola by 93 % and 128 %, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1777–1955 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lactuca sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought raised shoot SOD activity in G. deserticola plants by 128 %.

Taxon
Lactuca sativaLactuca sativat0
Organ / stage
shootse0
Treatment
Drought stresse0
Interactor
G. deserticolaSeptoglomus deserticolae0symbiont
Outcome
SOD activitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
128 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stress increased SOD activity of shoots of control plants by 17%, and that of shoots of plants colonized by G. mosseae and G. deserticola by 93 % and 128 %, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1777–1955 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lactuca sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Roots showed similar drought responses regardless of plant age.

Taxon
Lactuca sativaLactuca sativat0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Outcome
Similar resultse0
Qualifier
regardless of the plant agee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similar results were also found for roots, regardless of the plant age.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1956–2027 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lactuca sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–70 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased SOD activity was not related to nutritional status.

Taxon
Lactuca sativaLactuca sativat0
Organ / stage
plantse0
Outcome
SOD activitye0
Qualifier
not related to the nutritional status of the plantse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increased SOD activity in mycorrhizal plants was not related to the nutritional status of the plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2028–2133 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lactuca sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–70 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attribute higher SOD activity to a direct mycorrhizal response to drought.

Taxon
Lactuca sativaLactuca sativat0
Outcome
increased SOD activitye1
Qualifier
direct mechanism of AM association in response to drought exposuree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it could be ascribed to a direct mechanism of AM association in response to drought exposure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2143–2235 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lactuca sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–70 · show in text ↑
e1

“The increased SOD activity in mycorrhizal plants was not related to the nutritional status of the plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2028–2133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SOD isozyme pattern did not change with mycorrhizal association.

Taxon
Lactuca sativaLactuca sativat0
Treatment
mycorrhizal associatione0
Outcome
SOD isozyme patterne0
Direction
no changese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no changes in the SOD isozyme pattern as a consequence of mycorrhizal association or water treatment were observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2246–2361 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lactuca sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SOD isozyme pattern did not change with water treatment.

Taxon
Lactuca sativaLactuca sativat0
Treatment
water treatmente0
Outcome
SOD isozyme patterne0
Direction
no changese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no changes in the SOD isozyme pattern as a consequence of mycorrhizal association or water treatment were observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2246–2361 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lactuca sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–70 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results differ

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

mycorrhiza · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mycorrhiza · quality: protein · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.