Paper · 1992 · New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science

Effects of temperature of pre‐sowing hydration treatment and subsequent drying rates on the germination performance of celery seed

P. Coolbear; P. E. Toledo; U. Seetagoses

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract There is considerable potential for the improvement of the slow and irregular germination of celery seeds ( Apiurn graveolens L.) by pre‐sowing hydration treatments, but poor germination performance as a result of drying seeds after treatment is a recurrent problem. Over the temperature range 5–20°C the onset of seed germination is determined by a thermal time relationship, but a pre‐sowing treatment temperature of 15°C was identified as the most effective for the two celery cultivars—‘Tall Utah 52–70’ and ‘Green Giant Hybrid’—when the seeds were only surface‐dried before sowing. However, conventional air‐drying of treated seeds at 20°C caused severe delays in germination and decreased uniformity. Higher treatment temperatures reduced the adverse effect of drying on the seeds but resulted in little or no germination advantage because of thermodormancy, which was particularly evident at 25°C. Deleterious effects of drying‐back were avoided, and in some instances further germination enhancement gained, by slowing the rate of drying which was achieved by exposing the treated seed to a series of controlled humidity atmospheres at 80, 68, and 48% RH for various times.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Germination onset follows a thermal-time relationship at 5–20°C.

Treatment
temperature range 5–20°Ce0
Outcome
onset of seed germinatione0
Qualifier
thermal time relationshipe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Apium graveolens Dulce Group
Apium graveolens Dulce Group · Taxon · picture of the speciesMPF · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Over the temperature range 5–20°C the onset of seed germination is determined by a thermal time relationship”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–384 · show in text ↑
t0

“celery”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

15°C hydration was most effective for Tall Utah 52–70 when seeds were surface-dried.

Material
Tall Utah 52–70e0
Treatment
pre‐sowing treatment temperature of 15°Ce0
Outcome
most effectivee0
Direction
most effectivee0
Qualifier
when the seeds were only surface‐dried before sowinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Apium graveolens Dulce Group
Apium graveolens Dulce Group · Taxon · picture of the speciesMPF · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a pre‐sowing treatment temperature of 15°C was identified as the most effective for the two celery cultivars—‘Tall Utah 52–70’ and ‘Green Giant Hybrid’—when the seeds were only surface‐dried before sowing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–595 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

15°C hydration was most effective for Green Giant Hybrid when seeds were surface-dried.

Material
Green Giant Hybride0
Treatment
pre‐sowing treatment temperature of 15°Ce0
Outcome
most effectivee0
Direction
most effectivee0
Qualifier
when the seeds were only surface‐dried before sowinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Apium graveolens Dulce Group
Apium graveolens Dulce Group · Taxon · picture of the speciesMPF · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a pre‐sowing treatment temperature of 15°C was identified as the most effective for the two celery cultivars—‘Tall Utah 52–70’ and ‘Green Giant Hybrid’—when the seeds were only surface‐dried before sowing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–595 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Air-drying treated seeds at 20°C severely delayed germination.

Treatment
conventional air‐drying of treated seeds at 20°Ce0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
severe delayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Apium graveolens Dulce Group
Apium graveolens Dulce Group · Taxon · picture of the speciesMPF · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“conventional air‐drying of treated seeds at 20°C caused severe delays in germination and decreased uniformity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–715 · show in text ↑
t0

“celery”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Air-drying treated seeds at 20°C decreased germination uniformity.

Treatment
conventional air‐drying of treated seeds at 20°Ce0
Outcome
uniformitye0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Apium graveolens Dulce Group
Apium graveolens Dulce Group · Taxon · picture of the speciesMPF · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“conventional air‐drying of treated seeds at 20°C caused severe delays in germination and decreased uniformity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–715 · show in text ↑
t0

“celery”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher hydration temperatures reduced drying damage but gave little or no germination advantage.

Treatment
Higher treatment temperaturese0
Outcome
adverse effect of dryinge0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Apium graveolens Dulce Group
Apium graveolens Dulce Group · Taxon · picture of the speciesMPF · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher treatment temperatures reduced the adverse effect of drying on the seeds but resulted in little or no germination advantage because of thermodormancy, which was particularly evident at 25°C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–913 · show in text ↑
t0

“celery”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–125 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thermodormancy limited germination benefit at higher temperatures, especially 25°C.

Outcome
little or no germination advantagee0
Qualifier
because of thermodormancy, which was particularly evident at 25°Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Apium graveolens Dulce Group
Apium graveolens Dulce Group · Taxon · picture of the speciesMPF · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher treatment temperatures reduced the adverse effect of drying on the seeds but resulted in little or no germination advantage because of thermodormancy, which was particularly evident at 25°C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–913 · show in text ↑
t0

“celery”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Slowing drying through controlled humidity avoided drying-back damage.

Treatment
slowing the rate of dryinge0
Outcome
Deleterious effects of drying‐backe0
Direction
avoidede0
Qualifier
controlled humidity atmospheres at 80, 68, and 48% RH for various timese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Apium graveolens Dulce Group
Apium graveolens Dulce Group · Taxon · picture of the speciesMPF · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Deleterious effects of drying‐back were avoided, and in some instances further germination enhancement gained, by slowing the rate of drying which was achieved by exposing the treated seed to a series of controlled humidity atmospheres at 80, 68, and 48% RH for various times.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–1190 · show in text ↑
t0

“celery”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Slower drying sometimes enhanced germination further.

Treatment
slowing the rate of dryinge0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
enhancemente0
Qualifier
in some instancese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Apium graveolens Dulce Group
Apium graveolens Dulce Group · Taxon · picture of the speciesMPF · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Deleterious effects of drying‐back were avoided, and in some instances further germination enhancement gained, by slowing the rate of drying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–1054 · show in text ↑
t0

“celery”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–125 · show in text ↑

processing · growth · Apium graveolensPositive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.