Paper · 2002 · Plant Pathology

Plant defence reactions against fusarium wilt in chickpea induced by incompatible race 0 of Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. ciceris and nonhost isolates of F. oxysporum

J. M. Cachinero; A. Hervás; R. M. Jiménez‐Díaz; et al.

10
claims
21
verbatim quotes
74
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Germinated seeds of ‘kabuli’ chickpea cv. ICCV 4 were inoculated with a conidial suspension of the incompatible race 0 of Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. ciceris (Foc) or of nonhost F. oxysporum resistance ‘inducers’, and 3 days later were challenged by root dip with a conidial suspension of highly virulent Foc race 5. Prior inoculation with inducers delayed the onset of symptoms and/or significantly reduced the final amount of fusarium wilt caused by race 5. However, the extent of disease suppression varied with the nature of the inducing agent; the nonhost isolates of F. oxysporum were more effective at disease suppression than the incompatible Foc race 0. Inoculation with the inducers gave rise to synthesis of maackiain and medicarpin phytoalexins in inoculated seedlings; these did not accumulate in plant tissues but were released into the inoculum suspension. Inoculation with inducers also resulted in accumulation of chitinase, β‐1,3‐glucanase and peroxidase activities in plant roots. These defence‐related responses were induced more consistently and intensely by nonhost isolates of F. oxysporum than by incompatible Foc race 0. The phytoalexins and, to a lesser extent, the antifungal hydrolases, were also induced after challenge inoculation with Foc race 5. However, in this case the defence responses were induced in both preinduced and noninduced plants infected by the pathogen. It is concluded that the suppression of fusarium wilt in this study possibly involved an inhibitory effect on the pathogen of preinduced plant defences, rather than an increase in the expression of defence mechanisms of preinduced plants following a subsequent challenge inoculation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prior inducer inoculation delayed wilt symptom onset.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Prior inoculation with inducerse0
Outcome
onset of symptomse0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Prior inoculation with inducers delayed the onset of symptoms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–375 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Prior inducer inoculation significantly reduced final Fusarium wilt.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Prior inoculation with inducerse0
Interactor
race 5e0pathogen
Outcome
fusarium wilt caused by race 5e0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Prior inoculation with inducers delayed the onset of symptoms and/or significantly reduced the final amount of fusarium wilt caused by race 5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–455 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nonhost F. oxysporum isolates suppressed disease more effectively than incompatible Foc race 0.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
nonhost isolates of F. oxysporume0
Interactor
F. oxysporumFusarium oxysporume0pathogen
Outcome
disease suppressione0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
incompatible Foc race 0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum
Fusarium oxysporum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nonhost isolates of F. oxysporum were more effective at disease suppression than the incompatible Foc race 0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–658 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inducer inoculation elicited maackiain and medicarpin synthesis in seedlings.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Organ / stage
seedlingse0
Treatment
Inoculation with the inducerse0
Outcome
synthesis of maackiain and medicarpin phytoalexinse0
Direction
gave rise toe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with the inducers gave rise to synthesis of maackiain and medicarpin phytoalexins in inoculated seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–777 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The phytoalexins were released into inoculum suspension rather than accumulated in tissues.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Organ / stage
plant tissuese0
Outcome
released into the inoculum suspensione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these did not accumulate in plant tissues but were released into the inoculum suspension”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–867 · show in text ↑
e1

“maackiain and medicarpin phytoalexins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–753 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inducer inoculation increased chitinase, β‐1,3‐glucanase and peroxidase activities in roots.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Organ / stage
plant rootse0
Treatment
Inoculation with inducerse0
Outcome
chitinase, β‐1,3‐glucanase and peroxidase activitiese0
Direction
accumulatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with inducers also resulted in accumulation of chitinase, β‐1,3‐glucanase and peroxidase activities in plant roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–995 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nonhost F. oxysporum isolates induced defense responses more consistently and intensely than Foc race 0.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
nonhost isolates of F. oxysporume0
Interactor
F. oxysporumFusarium oxysporume0pathogen
Outcome
defence‐related responsese0
Direction
more consistently and intenselye0
Comparator
incompatible Foc race 0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum
Fusarium oxysporum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These defence‐related responses were induced more consistently and intensely by nonhost isolates of F. oxysporum than by incompatible Foc race 0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1141 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Race 5 challenge induced phytoalexins and, less strongly, antifungal hydrolases.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
challenge inoculation with Foc race 5e0
Interactor
Foc race 5e0pathogen
Outcome
phytoalexins and, to a lesser extent, the antifungal hydrolasese0
Direction
inducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The phytoalexins and, to a lesser extent, the antifungal hydrolases, were also induced after challenge inoculation with Foc race 5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1273 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Race 5 challenge induced defenses in both preinduced and noninduced plants.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
defence responses were inducede0
Qualifier
both preinduced and noninduced plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“defence responses were induced in both preinduced and noninduced plants infected by the pathogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1301–1397 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–57 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors suggest preinduced defenses may inhibit the pathogen and suppress wilt.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
suppression of fusarium wilte0
Qualifier
inhibitory effect on the pathogen of preinduced plant defencese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“suppression of fusarium wilt in this study possibly involved an inhibitory effect on the pathogen of preinduced plant defences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1424–1550 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–57 · show in text ↑

Fusarium oxysporum · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

inoculation · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 15 positive, 13 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

inoculation · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.