Paper · 2001 · Journal of General Virology

The ORF0 product of Potato leafroll virus is indispensable for virus accumulation

Ewa Sadowy; Anna Maasen; Marek Juszczuk; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
40
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Using a cDNA expression cassette in combination with agroinoculation of potato leaf discs we have investigated the role the protein encoded by ORF0 of Potato leafroll virus (PLRV) and have shown its importance for virus accumulation. Two mutations introduced into ORF0 by site-directed mutagenesis prevented expression of the corresponding protein and completely abolished virus accumulation in plant cells. They did not, however, affect translation of ORF1 and ORF2. We therefore conclude that ORF0 of PLRV produces a protein essential for virus accumulation, a hitherto undescribed finding.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two ORF0 mutations prevented expression of the corresponding protein.

Treatment
Two mutations introduced into ORF0e0
Gene
ORF0e0
Outcome
expression of the corresponding proteine0
Direction
preventede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two mutations introduced into ORF0 by site-directed mutagenesis prevented expression of the corresponding protein”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–347 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two ORF0 mutations abolished virus accumulation in plant cells.

Treatment
Two mutations introduced into ORF0e0
Gene
ORF0e0
Outcome
virus accumulation in plant cellse0
Direction
completely abolishede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two mutations introduced into ORF0 by site-directed mutagenesis prevented expression of the corresponding protein and completely abolished virus accumulation in plant cells”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–406 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mutations did not affect translation of ORF1 and ORF2.

Gene
ORF1 and ORF2e0
Outcome
translation of ORF1 and ORF2e0
Direction
did not, however, affecte0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“They did not, however, affect translation of ORF1 and ORF2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 408–467 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato leafroll virus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–41 · show in text ↑

loss of function · molecular: expression · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 6 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

loss of function · disease · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 15 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.