Paper · 2014 · SpringerPlus

Molecular diversity and functional variability of environmental isolates of Bacillus species

Ajay Kumar; Ajay Kumar; Amit Kumar; et al.

15
claims
33
verbatim quotes
60
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In the present study, out of 264 phosphate (P) solubilizing Bacillus strains isolated from apple rhizosphere, only twelve isolates were found to be efficient (showed most of the plant growth promoting activity) which were further characterized at molecular level using 16S rDNA partial gene sequencing. Out of 12 isolates, MZPSB 207 was found to be most efficient P-solubilizing (864.71 μg/ml) isolate which also showed indole acetic acid production (51.83 μg/ml), siderophore production, ammonia production, antagonistic property (against Rhizoctonia solani and Fusarium oxysporum), hydrolytic enzymes productions (protease, chitinase and cellulase), 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase production (7.7 μm αKB mg(-1) h(-1)). The in-vitro seed germination assay showed that Bacillus (twelve isolates) inoculated seeds showed more seed germination and seedling vigor rate as compared to uninoculated control treatment. For the genetic diversity studies of efficient 12 strains, the polyphasic approach using 16S-rDNA, Repetitive element sequence (rep) based PCR (ERIC-PCR and BOX-PCR) were used. Based on 16S rDNA partial gene sequencing the isolated Bacillus genus was divide into four groups. First group (five isolates), second group (two isolates), third group (three isolates) and fourth group (two isolates) which showed close genetic relatedness to the B. subtilis, B. pumulis, B. megaterium and B. amyloliquefaciens, respectively. The rep PCR fingerprinting showed variability between and within the species. The large variability was showed by ERIC-PCR whereas some variability was showed by BOX-PCR. The results clearly showed that 16S rRNA gene sequencing is unable to discriminate the isolates at strain level. But rep-PCR fingerprinting is excellent tool to characterize and discriminate the strains at the genomic level.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twelve of 264 apple rhizosphere Bacillus isolates were efficient plant growth promoters.

Interactor
Bacilluse0symbiont
Outcome
plant growth promoting activitye0
Value
twelve isolatese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“out of 264 phosphate (P) solubilizing Bacillus strains isolated from apple rhizosphere, only twelve isolates were found to be efficient (showed most of the plant growth promoting activity)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–210 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MZPSB 207 was the most efficient phosphate solubilizer, at 864.71 μg/ml.

Interactor
MZPSB 207e0symbiont
Outcome
P-solubilizinge0
Value
864.71 μg/mle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MZPSB 207 was found to be most efficient P-solubilizing (864.71 μg/ml) isolate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–401 · show in text ↑
e1

“apple rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MZPSB 207 produced indole acetic acid at 51.83 μg/ml.

Interactor
MZPSB 207e0symbiont
Outcome
indole acetic acid productione0
Value
51.83 μg/mle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MZPSB 207 was found to be most efficient P-solubilizing (864.71 μg/ml) isolate which also showed indole acetic acid production (51.83 μg/ml)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–463 · show in text ↑
e1

“apple rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MZPSB 207 produced siderophores and ammonia.

Interactor
MZPSB 207e0symbiont
Outcome
siderophore production, ammonia productione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MZPSB 207 was found to be most efficient P-solubilizing (864.71 μg/ml) isolate which also showed indole acetic acid production (51.83 μg/ml), siderophore production, ammonia production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–507 · show in text ↑
e1

“apple rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MZPSB 207 showed antagonism against Rhizoctonia solani.

Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Second interactor
MZPSB 207e1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
antagonistic propertye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“antagonistic property (against Rhizoctonia solani and Fusarium oxysporum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–582 · show in text ↑
e1

“MZPSB 207 was found to be most efficient”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–363 · show in text ↑
e2

“apple rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MZPSB 207 showed antagonism against Fusarium oxysporum.

Interactor
Fusarium oxysporumFusarium oxysporume0pathogen
Second interactor
MZPSB 207e1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
antagonistic propertye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum
Fusarium oxysporum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“antagonistic property (against Rhizoctonia solani and Fusarium oxysporum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–582 · show in text ↑
e1

“MZPSB 207 was found to be most efficient”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–363 · show in text ↑
e2

“apple rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MZPSB 207 produced protease, chitinase, and cellulase.

Interactor
MZPSB 207e1symbiont
Outcome
hydrolytic enzymes productionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hydrolytic enzymes productions (protease, chitinase and cellulase)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–650 · show in text ↑
e1

“MZPSB 207 was found to be most efficient”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–363 · show in text ↑
e2

“apple rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MZPSB 207 produced ACC deaminase at 7.7 μm αKB mg(-1) h(-1).

Interactor
MZPSB 207e1symbiont
Outcome
1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase productione0
Value
7.7 μm αKB mg(-1) h(-1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase production (7.7 μm αKB mg(-1) h(-1))”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–738 · show in text ↑
e1

“MZPSB 207 was found to be most efficient”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–363 · show in text ↑
e2

“apple rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus inoculation increased seed germination relative to uninoculated control.

Treatment
Bacillus (twelve isolates) inoculatede0
Interactor
Bacilluse0symbiont
Outcome
seed germinatione0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
uninoculated control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The in-vitro seed germination assay showed that Bacillus (twelve isolates) inoculated seeds showed more seed germination and seedling vigor rate as compared to uninoculated control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–931 · show in text ↑
e1

“apple rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus inoculation increased seedling vigor relative to uninoculated control.

Treatment
Bacillus (twelve isolates) inoculatede0
Interactor
Bacilluse0symbiont
Outcome
seedling vigor ratee0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
uninoculated control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The in-vitro seed germination assay showed that Bacillus (twelve isolates) inoculated seeds showed more seed germination and seedling vigor rate as compared to uninoculated control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–931 · show in text ↑
e1

“apple rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–108 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

16S sequencing separated the Bacillus isolates into four groups related to four named species.

Interactor
Bacilluse0symbiont
Outcome
four groupse0
Value
four groupse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Based on 16S rDNA partial gene sequencing the isolated Bacillus genus was divide into four groups. First group (five isolates), second group (two isolates), third group (three isolates) and fourth group (two isolates) which showed close genetic relatedness to the B. subtilis, B. pumulis, B. megaterium and B. amyloliquefaciens, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1451 · show in text ↑
e1

“apple rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–108 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rep-PCR fingerprints varied between and within Bacillus species.

Interactor
Bacilluse1symbiont
Outcome
variability between and within the speciese0
Comparator
between and within the speciese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rep PCR fingerprinting showed variability between and within the species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1529 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bacillus strains isolated from apple rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 60–108 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ERIC-PCR showed large variability, whereas BOX-PCR showed some variability.

Interactor
Bacilluse1symbiont
Outcome
large variabilitye0
Comparator
BOX-PCRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The large variability was showed by ERIC-PCR whereas some variability was showed by BOX-PCR.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1530–1622 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bacillus strains isolated from apple rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 60–108 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

16S rRNA sequencing could not discriminate isolates at strain level.

Interactor
Bacilluse1symbiont
Outcome
discriminate the isolates at strain levele0
Value
16S rRNA gene sequencinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“16S rRNA gene sequencing is unable to discriminate the isolates at strain level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1655–1735 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bacillus strains isolated from apple rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 60–108 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rep-PCR fingerprints characterized and discriminated strains at genomic level.

Interactor
Bacilluse1symbiont
Outcome
characterize and discriminate the strains at the genomic levele0
Value
rep-PCR fingerprintinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rep-PCR fingerprinting is excellent tool to characterize and discriminate the strains at the genomic level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1740–1847 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bacillus strains isolated from apple rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 60–108 · show in text ↑

inoculation · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 31 positive, 11 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.