Paper · 1999 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Biomass production and phosphorus accumulation of potato as affected by phosphorus nutrition

E. Alvarez‐Sánchez; J. D. Etchevers; J. Ortiz; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
45
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Potato (Solatium tuberosum) generally requires high amounts of phosphate fertilizer to reach economically acceptable yields, particularly in soils originating from volcanic ash. This is a consequence of the potato plants low root density and the slow soil diffusion rate of phosphorus (P) in these soils. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of P rates on tuber yield, biomass production, and distribution, biomass P accumulation and concentration, and P distribution in potato cv. Mexiquense. The experiment was carried out in an Andisol (7.8 μg g‐1 Olsen‐P) located at the east of Valle de México. Fertilization rates were 0, 18,41,46,69,78,90,106,113,135,150,163, and 207 kg ha‐1 P, from ordinary superphosphate. Top growth and root biomass, tuber yield, P percentage and P accumulation in different plant parts were measured at harvest. Minimum and maximum average tuber yields were 8.4 and 18.0 Mg ha‐1; the plants absorbed 5.8 and 11.8 kg ha‐1 P, corresponding to 0 (control) and 207 kg ha‐1 P, respectively. Phosphorus fertilization had little influence on plant P concentration, where average concentrations in tuber and top growth were 0.20 and 0.24 % P, respectively. By contrast, P accumulation increased with increasing P rates, but P distribution between tuber and top growth was dependent on the amount of P applied. The control treatment showed approximately 1:1 distribution of P between top growth and tuber, but as P rate increased, top growth P decreased and tuber P increased. When applying the highest P rate, 36% of P accumulated in the top growth and 64 % in the tuber. The information obtained will permit decisions on the correct use of phosphate fertilizer for potato in Andisols of the Valle de Mexico.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tuber yield rose from 8.4 Mg ha‐1 at zero P to 18.0 Mg ha‐1 at 207 kg ha‐1 P.

Material
Mexiquensee1
Treatment
207 kg ha‐1 Pe0
Outcome
tuber yieldse0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
18.0 Mg ha‐1e0
Qualifier
8.4e0
Comparator
0 (control)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Minimum and maximum average tuber yields were 8.4 and 18.0 Mg ha‐1; the plants absorbed 5.8 and 11.8 kg ha‐1 P, corresponding to 0 (control) and 207 kg ha‐1 P, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–1026 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato cv. Mexiquense”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–505 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant P absorption rose from 5.8 to 11.8 kg ha‐1 P across the same fertilizer rates.

Treatment
207 kg ha‐1 Pe0
Outcome
plants absorbede0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
11.8 kg ha‐1 Pe0
Qualifier
5.8e0
Comparator
0 (control)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the plants absorbed 5.8 and 11.8 kg ha‐1 P, corresponding to 0 (control) and 207 kg ha‐1 P, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1026 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato cv. Mexiquense”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–505 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization had little influence on plant P concentration.

Treatment
Phosphorus fertilizatione0
Outcome
plant P concentratione0
Direction
little influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorus fertilization had little influence on plant P concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1098 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato cv. Mexiquense”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–505 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average tuber P concentration was 0.20 % P.

Organ / stage
tubere0
Outcome
average concentrations in tubere0
Value
0.20e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“average concentrations in tuber and top growth were 0.20 and 0.24 % P, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1189 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato cv. Mexiquense”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–505 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average top-growth P concentration was 0.24 % P.

Organ / stage
top growthe0
Outcome
average concentrations in tuber and top growthe0
Value
0.24 % Pe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“average concentrations in tuber and top growth were 0.20 and 0.24 % P, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1189 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato cv. Mexiquense”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–505 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P accumulation increased with P rate.

Treatment
P ratese0
Outcome
P accumulatione0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P accumulation increased with increasing P rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1204–1252 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato cv. Mexiquense”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–505 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P partitioning between tuber and top growth depended on applied P amount.

Treatment
amount of P appliede0
Outcome
P distribution between tuber and top growthe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P distribution between tuber and top growth was dependent on the amount of P applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1342 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato cv. Mexiquense”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–505 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without fertilizer, P distribution between top growth and tuber was about 1:1.

Outcome
distribution of P between top growth and tubere0
Value
1:1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The control treatment showed approximately 1:1 distribution of P between top growth and tuber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1344–1437 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato cv. Mexiquense”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–505 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing P rate decreased top-growth P share and increased tuber P share.

Treatment
P ratee0
Outcome
top growth Pe0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
tuber P increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“as P rate increased, top growth P decreased and tuber P increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1443–1508 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato cv. Mexiquense”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–505 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the highest P rate, 36% of accumulated P was in top growth.

Outcome
P accumulated in the top growthe0
Value
36%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When applying the highest P rate, 36% of P accumulated in the top growth and 64 % in the tuber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1510–1604 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato cv. Mexiquense”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–505 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the highest P rate, 64 % of accumulated P was in the tuber.

Outcome
P accumulated in the top growth and 64 % in the tubere0
Value
64 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When applying the highest P rate, 36% of P accumulated in the top growth and 64 % in the tuber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1510–1604 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato cv. Mexiquense”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–505 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ

51 papers: 42 positive, 9 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

123 papers: 97 positive, 26 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 97 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

119 papers more in this group

See all 123 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.