Paper · 1999 · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY

Antisense Repression of Hexokinase 1 Leads to an Overaccumulation of Starch in Leaves of Transgenic Potato Plants But Not to Significant Changes in Tuber Carbohydrate Metabolism

Jon Veramendi; Ute Roessner; Andreas Renz; et al.

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
104
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) plants transformed with sense and antisense constructs of a cDNA encoding the potato hexokinase 1 (StHK1) exhibited altered enzyme activities and expression of StHK1 mRNA. Measurements of the maximum catalytic activity of hexokinase revealed a 22-fold variation in leaves (from 22% of the wild-type activity in antisense transformants to 485% activity in sense transformants) and a 7-fold variation in developing tubers (from 32% of the wild-type activity in antisense transformants to 222% activity in sense transformants). Despite the wide range of hexokinase activities, no change was found in the fresh weight yield, starch, sugar, or metabolite levels of transgenic tubers. However, there was a 3-fold increase in the starch content of leaves from the antisense transformants after the dark period. Starch accumulation at the end of the night period was correlated with a 2-fold increase of glucose and a decrease of sucrose content. These results provide strong support for the hypothesis that glucose is a primary product of transitory starch degradation and is the sugar that is exported to the cytosol at night to support sucrose biosynthesis.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sense and antisense StHK1 transformants changed enzyme activity and transcript expression.

Taxon
Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)Solanum tuberosume0
Treatment
sense and antisense constructse0
Gene
StHK1e0
Outcome
enzyme activities and expression of StHK1 mRNAe0
Direction
alterede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) plants transformed with sense and antisense constructs of a cDNA encoding the potato hexokinase 1 (StHK1) exhibited altered enzyme activities and expression of StHK1 mRNA.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–201 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf hexokinase activity ranged from 22% in antisense plants to 485% in sense plants relative to wild type.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Gene
hexokinasee1
Outcome
maximum catalytic activity of hexokinasee1
Direction
variatione0
Value
22-folde0
Qualifier
from 22% of the wild-type activity in antisense transformants to 485% activity in sense transformantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a 22-fold variation in leaves (from 22% of the wild-type activity in antisense transformants to 485% activity in sense transformants)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–405 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“maximum catalytic activity of hexokinase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 222–262 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Developing tuber hexokinase activity ranged from 32% in antisense plants to 222% in sense plants.

Organ / stage
developing tuberse0
Outcome
hexokinase activitiese1
Direction
variatione0
Value
7-folde0
Qualifier
from 32% of the wild-type activity in antisense transformants to 222% activity in sense transformantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a 7-fold variation in developing tubers (from 32% of the wild-type activity in antisense transformants to 222% activity in sense transformants)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–553 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“Despite the wide range of hexokinase activities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–602 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transgenic tubers had no change in fresh weight yield.

Material
transgenic tuberse0
Outcome
fresh weight yielde0
Direction
no changee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“no change was found in the fresh weight yield, starch, sugar, or metabolite levels of transgenic tubers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–707 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transgenic tubers had no change in starch, sugar, or metabolite levels.

Material
transgenic tuberse0
Outcome
starch, sugar, or metabolite levelse0
Direction
no changee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“no change was found in the fresh weight yield, starch, sugar, or metabolite levels of transgenic tubers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–707 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antisense leaves had threefold higher starch content after darkness.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
antisense transformantse0
Outcome
starch contente0
Direction
increasee0
Value
3-folde0
Qualifier
after the dark periode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“a 3-fold increase in the starch content of leaves from the antisense transformants after the dark period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–832 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Night starch accumulation correlated with a twofold glucose increase.

Compound
glucosee0
Outcome
Starch accumulatione0
Direction
increasee0
Value
2-folde0
Qualifier
at the end of the night periode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“Starch accumulation at the end of the night period was correlated with a 2-fold increase of glucose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–933 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Night starch accumulation correlated with reduced sucrose content.

Compound
sucrosee0
Outcome
Starch accumulatione0
Direction
decreasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“Starch accumulation at the end of the night period was correlated with a 2-fold increase of glucose and a decrease of sucrose content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–967 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors support glucose as the primary product of transient starch breakdown and night export sugar.

Compound
glucosee0
Outcome
primary product of transitory starch degradatione0
Qualifier
exported to the cytosol at night to support sucrose biosynthesise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“glucose is a primary product of transitory starch degradation and is the sugar that is exported to the cytosol at night to support sucrose biosynthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1181 · show in text ↑

loss of function · quality: sugar starch · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 5 positive, 8 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

transgenic · quality: sugar starch · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 2 positive, 12 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.