Paper · 2005 · Peanut Science

Weed Management and Net Returns Using Soil-Applied and Postemergence Herbicide Programs in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)

W. James Grichar; Brent A. Besler; Robert G. Lemon; et al.

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field studies were conducted during the 1997 and 1998 growing seasons to compare Palmer amaranth and Texas panicum control and peanut pod yield and net returns by dimethenamid, ethalfluralin, or S-metolachlor applied alone or with sequential postemergence (POST) applications of acifluorfen, acifluorfen plus bentazon, bentazon, imazapic, imazethapyr, or pyridate. The addition of a POST herbicide to ethalfluralin did not improve Texas panicum control over ethalfluralin alone. Dimethenamid followed by imazapic POST or S-metolachlor followed by imazapic or imazethapyr POST improved Texas panicum control over those two soil-applied herbicides used alone. Palmer amaranth control was acceptable with imazapic or imazethapyr alone (82 to 93%). Only imazapic applied POST following ethalfluralin improved Palmer amaranth control over ethalfluralin alone. The addition of any POST herbicide to dimethenamid improved Palmer amaranth control over dimethenamid alone while only the addition of bentazon or pyridate to S-metolachlor did not improve Palmer amaranth control over S-metolachlor alone. Peanut yield increased as herbicide inputs increased. Herbicide systems which include imazapic applied POST following ethalfluralin, dimethenamid, or S-metolachlor soil-applied provided the highest peanut yield and net return.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding a POST herbicide to ethalfluralin did not improve Texas panicum control.

Treatment
POST herbicidee0
Interactor
Texas panicume0weed
Outcome
Texas panicum controle0
Direction
did not improvee0
Comparator
ethalfluralin alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of a POST herbicide to ethalfluralin did not improve Texas panicum control over ethalfluralin alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 365–477 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dimethenamid followed by imazapic improved Texas panicum control over dimethenamid alone.

Treatment
Dimethenamid followed by imazapic POSTe0
Interactor
Texas panicume0weed
Outcome
Texas panicum controle0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
those two soil-applied herbicides used alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dimethenamid followed by imazapic POST or S-metolachlor followed by imazapic or imazethapyr POST improved Texas panicum control over those two soil-applied herbicides used alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–656 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S-metolachlor followed by imazapic or imazethapyr improved Texas panicum control over soil-applied herbicide alone.

Treatment
S-metolachlor followed by imazapic or imazethapyr POSTe0
Interactor
Texas panicume0weed
Outcome
Texas panicum controle0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
those two soil-applied herbicides used alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S-metolachlor followed by imazapic or imazethapyr POST improved Texas panicum control over those two soil-applied herbicides used alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–656 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazapic or imazethapyr alone achieved acceptable Palmer amaranth control of 82 to 93%.

Treatment
imazapic or imazethapyr alonee0
Interactor
Palmer amaranthe0weed
Outcome
Palmer amaranth controle0
Value
82 to 93%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Palmer amaranth control was acceptable with imazapic or imazethapyr alone (82 to 93%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–743 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only imazapic POST after ethalfluralin improved Palmer amaranth control over ethalfluralin alone.

Treatment
imazapic applied POST following ethalfluraline0
Interactor
Palmer amaranthe0weed
Outcome
Palmer amaranth controle0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
ethalfluralin alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Only imazapic applied POST following ethalfluralin improved Palmer amaranth control over ethalfluralin alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–853 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding any POST herbicide to dimethenamid improved Palmer amaranth control.

Treatment
any POST herbicide to dimethenamide0
Interactor
Palmer amaranthe0weed
Outcome
Palmer amaranth controle0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
dimethenamid alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of any POST herbicide to dimethenamid improved Palmer amaranth control over dimethenamid alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–962 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding bentazon or pyridate to S-metolachlor did not improve Palmer amaranth control.

Treatment
bentazon or pyridate to S-metolachlore0
Interactor
Palmer amaranthe0weed
Outcome
Palmer amaranth controle0
Direction
did not improvee0
Comparator
S-metolachlor alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the addition of bentazon or pyridate to S-metolachlor did not improve Palmer amaranth control over S-metolachlor alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1092 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–97 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peanut yield rose with increasing herbicide inputs.

Treatment
herbicide inputse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Peanut yield increased as herbicide inputs increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1146 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Programs including imazapic POST following ethalfluralin, dimethenamid or S-metolachlor gave the highest peanut yield and net returns.

Treatment
imazapic applied POST following ethalfluralin, dimethenamid, or S-metolachlor soil-appliede0
Outcome
peanut yield and net returne0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Herbicide systems which include imazapic applied POST following ethalfluralin, dimethenamid, or S-metolachlor soil-applied provided the highest peanut yield and net return”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1319 · show in text ↑

dimethenamid · control · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Pyridate · control · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Imazethapyr · control · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 12 positive, 6 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

bentazone · control · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 14 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

imazapic · control · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 23 positive, 3 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Ethalfluralin · control · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

herbicide · control · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 33 positive, 4 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.