Paper · 2013 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Effect of Phosphorus in Alleviation of Adverse Impacts of Salinity on Wheat Grown on Different Soils

Enas Mohamed Wagdi; Shawky M. Metwally; M. K. Matar; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Fertilization management is an important technique to alleviate the adverse effects of salinity stress on plants. A pot experiment was conducted to evaluate the ameliorative role of inorganic phosphorus (P) and organic P sources on wheat grown under salt stress in three soil types deficient in available P. Wheat (Triticum asetivum L. cv. Shakha 93) was grown on alluvial, sandy, and calcareous soils under salinity levels of 4, 8, and 12 dS m−1 of saturated paste extract (ECe) and supplied with constant rate of 30 mg P2O5 kg soil−1 as superphosphate (SP), cattle manure (CM), and 1:1 mixture of SP and CM. The results revealed that plants grown on the sandy soil were more susceptible to the adverse effects of salinity compared with those planted on the alluvial one, especially at zero P. Plants grown on the calcareous soil were moderately affected. Varying soil type caused significant differences in the aboveground biomass and uptake of nitrogen (N), potassium (K), P, and zinc (Zn). It was obvious that P ameliorated wheat growth under salt stress, and this role was greater under moderate and high salinity. The increases in N, P, K, and Zn uptake appeared driven by P application were more conspicuous in the sandy and calcareous soils. Results also indicated that combined application of inorganic and organic P sources surpassed both when applied solely under all soil types and salinity levels.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress affected wheat more strongly in sandy than alluvial soil, particularly without phosphorus.

Outcome
susceptible to the adverse effects of salinitye1
Direction
moree1
Qualifier
especially at zero Pe1
Comparator
alluvial onee1
Setting
sandy soile1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat (Triticum asetivum L. cv. Shakha 93)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–350 · show in text ↑
e1

“plants grown on the sandy soil were more susceptible to the adverse effects of salinity compared with those planted on the alluvial one, especially at zero P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–793 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat in calcareous soil was moderately affected by salinity.

Outcome
moderately affectede1
Setting
calcareous soile1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat (Triticum asetivum L. cv. Shakha 93)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–350 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plants grown on the calcareous soil were moderately affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–855 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil type significantly changed wheat aboveground biomass.

Outcome
aboveground biomasse1
Setting
soil typee1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat (Triticum asetivum L. cv. Shakha 93)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–350 · show in text ↑
e1

“Varying soil type caused significant differences in the aboveground biomass and uptake of nitrogen (N), potassium (K), P, and zinc (Zn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–992 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil type significantly changed wheat nitrogen, potassium and phosphorus uptake.

Outcome
uptake of nitrogen (N), potassium (K), Pe1
Setting
soil typee1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat (Triticum asetivum L. cv. Shakha 93)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–350 · show in text ↑
e1

“Varying soil type caused significant differences in the aboveground biomass and uptake of nitrogen (N), potassium (K), P, and zinc (Zn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–992 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil type significantly changed wheat zinc uptake.

Outcome
zinc (Zn)e1
Setting
soil typee1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat (Triticum asetivum L. cv. Shakha 93)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–350 · show in text ↑
e1

“Varying soil type caused significant differences in the aboveground biomass and uptake of nitrogen (N), potassium (K), P, and zinc (Zn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–992 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus improved wheat growth under salt stress, especially under moderate and high salinity.

Treatment
Pe0
Outcome
wheat growthe0
Direction
amelioratede0
Qualifier
moderate and high salinitye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P ameliorated wheat growth under salt stress, and this role was greater under moderate and high salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus application increased nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium uptake more conspicuously in sandy and calcareous soils.

Treatment
P applicatione0
Outcome
N, P, Ke0
Direction
increasese0
Setting
sandy and calcareous soilse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increases in N, P, K, and Zn uptake appeared driven by P application were more conspicuous in the sandy and calcareous soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1248 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat (Triticum asetivum L. cv. Shakha 93)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–350 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus application increased zinc uptake more conspicuously in sandy and calcareous soils.

Treatment
P applicatione0
Outcome
Zn uptakee0
Direction
increasese0
Setting
sandy and calcareous soilse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increases in N, P, K, and Zn uptake appeared driven by P application were more conspicuous in the sandy and calcareous soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1248 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat (Triticum asetivum L. cv. Shakha 93)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–350 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined inorganic and organic phosphorus sources outperformed either alone across soils and salinity levels.

Treatment
combined application of inorganic and organic P sourcese0
Outcome
surpassede0
Direction
surpassede0
Qualifier
all soil types and salinity levelse0
Comparator
both when applied solelye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combined application of inorganic and organic P sources surpassed both when applied solely under all soil types and salinity levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1409 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat (Triticum asetivum L. cv. Shakha 93)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–350 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

193 papers: 158 positive, 35 negative or no effect

157 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

189 papers more in this group

See all 193 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

226 papers: 198 positive, 28 negative or no effect

197 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

222 papers more in this group

See all 226 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.