Paper · 1970 · Journal of Economic Entomology

Effects of Methyl Parathion, DDT, and Toxaphene on the Boll Weevil, Bollworm, and Cotton Plant in North Carolina12

W. J. Mistric; B. M. Covington; F. D. Smith

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Toxaphene + DDT, methyl parathion + DDT, and toxaphene + DDT + methyl parathion sprays applied early and late in the cotton season provided adequate control of the boll weevil, Anthonomus grandis Boheman, and the bollworm, Heliothis zea (Boddie), during 1961–63. Differences in effectiveness of these treatments against these insects were not significant. Also, no significant differences in total square or boll production, plant height at harvest, or total yield were found among these treatments. Treatments of methyl parathion + DDT and toxaphene + DDT + methyl parathion delayed squaring about 5–10 days, and this delay in squaring resulted in a corresponding delay in maturity. Thus, the reproductive physiology of cotton was affected slightly by methyl parathion.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Toxaphene plus DDT, methyl parathion plus DDT, and the three-way spray gave adequate control of the boll weevil on cotton.

Treatment
Toxaphene + DDT, methyl parathion + DDT, and toxaphene + DDT + methyl parathion sprays applied early and latee0
Interactor
Anthonomus grandisAnthonomus grandise0pest
Outcome
control of the boll weevile0
Direction
adequatee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Anthonomus grandis
Anthonomus grandis · InteractorAgricultural Research Service , United States Department of Agriculture . · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“Toxaphene + DDT, methyl parathion + DDT, and toxaphene + DDT + methyl parathion sprays applied early and late in the cotton season provided adequate control of the boll weevil, Anthonomus grandis Boheman, and the bollworm, Heliothis zea (Boddie), during 1961–63”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–261 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same sprays gave adequate control of the bollworm on cotton.

Treatment
Toxaphene + DDT, methyl parathion + DDT, and toxaphene + DDT + methyl parathion sprays applied early and latee0
Interactor
Heliothis zeaHelicoverpa zeae0pest
Outcome
adequate controle0
Direction
adequatee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa zea
Helicoverpa zea · InteractorAndy Reago & Chrissy McClarren · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“Toxaphene + DDT, methyl parathion + DDT, and toxaphene + DDT + methyl parathion sprays applied early and late in the cotton season provided adequate control of the boll weevil, Anthonomus grandis Boheman, and the bollworm, Heliothis zea (Boddie), during 1961–63”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–261 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Differences in effectiveness of the treatments against the boll weevil and bollworm were not significant.

Treatment
these treatmentse1
Outcome
effectiveness of these treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–94 · show in text ↑
e1

“Differences in effectiveness of these treatments against these insects were not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–354 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total square or boll production, plant height at harvest and total yield did not differ significantly among the treatments.

Treatment
these treatmentse2
Outcome
total square or boll production, plant height at harvest, or total yielde2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–94 · show in text ↑
e2

“no significant differences in total square or boll production, plant height at harvest, or total yield were found among these treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–498 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Methyl parathion plus DDT delayed squaring by about 5–10 days.

Treatment
methyl parathion + DDTe3
Outcome
squaringe3
Direction
delayede3
Value
5–10 dayse3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–94 · show in text ↑
e3

“Treatments of methyl parathion + DDT and toxaphene + DDT + methyl parathion delayed squaring about 5–10 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–608 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Toxaphene plus DDT plus methyl parathion delayed squaring by about 5–10 days.

Treatment
toxaphene + DDT + methyl parathione3
Outcome
squaringe3
Direction
delayede3
Value
5–10 dayse3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–94 · show in text ↑
e3

“Treatments of methyl parathion + DDT and toxaphene + DDT + methyl parathion delayed squaring about 5–10 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–608 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The delay in squaring resulted in a corresponding delay in cotton maturity.

Outcome
maturitye4
Qualifier
this delay in squaringe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–94 · show in text ↑
e4

“this delay in squaring resulted in a corresponding delay in maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–682 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Methyl parathion slightly affected the reproductive physiology of cotton.

Treatment
methyl parathione5
Outcome
the reproductive physiology of cottone5
Direction
affected slightlye5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–94 · show in text ↑
e5

“Thus, the reproductive physiology of cotton was affected slightly by methyl parathion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–769 · show in text ↑

toxaphene · Anthonomus grandis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

parathion-methyl · Helicoverpa zea · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

parathion-methyl · Anthonomus grandis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

toxaphene · Helicoverpa zea · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

application · Helicoverpa zea · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

application · Anthonomus grandis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.