Paper · 2008 · Weed Technology

Effects of Postemergence and Postemergence-Directed Halosulfuron on Triploid Watermelon (Citrullus Lanatus)

Peter J. Dittmar; David W. Monks; Jonathan R. Schultheis; et al.

13
claims
17
verbatim quotes
7
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Studies were conducted in 2006 at Clinton and Kinston, NC, to determine the influence of halosulfuron POST (over the crop plant) or POST-directed (to the crop) on growth and yield of transplanted ‘Precious Petite’ and ‘Tri-X-313’ triploid watermelon. Treatments included a nontreated control, 39 g/ha halosulfuron applied POST-directed to 25% of the plant (distal or proximal region), POST-directed to 50% of the plant (distal or proximal; Precious Petite only), and POST. Watermelon treated with halosulfuron displayed chlorotic leaves, shortened internodes, and increased stem splitting. Vines were longest in the nontreated control (Tri-X-313 = 146 cm, Precious Petite = 206 cm) but were shortest in the POST treatment (Tri-X-313 = 88 cm, Precious Petite = 77 cm). Halosulfuron POST to watermelon caused the greatest injury (Tri-X-313 = 64%, Precious Petite = 67%). Halosulfuron directed to 25 or 50% (distal or proximal) of the plant caused less injury than halosulfuron applied POST. Stem splitting was greatest when halosulfuron was applied to the proximal area of the stem compared with POST-directed distal or POST. Internode shortening was greatest in treatments where halosulfuron was applied to the distal region of the stem. However, Tri-X-313 in the POST-directed 25% distal treatment produced similar total and marketable fruit weight as the nontreated control at Clinton. Fruit number did not differ among treatments for either cultivar. At Kinston, Precious Petite nontreated control and POST-directed 25% distal end treatment had greater marketable fruit weight than the POST-directed 50% proximal and POST treatments. The current halosulfuron registration allows POST application between rows or PRE. Limiting halosulfuron contact to no more than 25% of the watermelon plant will likely improve crop tolerance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Halosulfuron caused chlorotic leaves, shortened internodes and increased stem splitting in watermelon.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Treatment
halosulfurone0
Outcome
chlorotic leaves, shortened internodes, and increased stem splittinge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Watermelon treated with halosulfuron displayed chlorotic leaves, shortened internodes, and increased stem splitting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–589 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tri-X-313 vines were longest in untreated controls at 146 cm and shortest with POST halosulfuron at 88 cm.

Material
Tri-X-313e0
Treatment
POST treatmente0
Outcome
Vinese0
Direction
shorteste0
Value
88 cme0
Qualifier
146 cme0
Comparator
nontreated controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Vines were longest in the nontreated control (Tri-X-313 = 146 cm, Precious Petite = 206 cm) but were shortest in the POST treatment (Tri-X-313 = 88 cm, Precious Petite = 77 cm).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–767 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Precious Petite vines were longest in untreated controls at 206 cm and shortest with POST halosulfuron at 77 cm.

Material
Precious Petitee0
Treatment
POST treatmente0
Outcome
Vinese0
Direction
shorteste0
Value
77 cme0
Qualifier
206 cme0
Comparator
nontreated controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Vines were longest in the nontreated control (Tri-X-313 = 146 cm, Precious Petite = 206 cm) but were shortest in the POST treatment (Tri-X-313 = 88 cm, Precious Petite = 77 cm).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–767 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

POST halosulfuron caused the greatest Tri-X-313 injury, 64%.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Material
Tri-X-313e0
Treatment
Halosulfuron POSTe0
Outcome
injurye0
Direction
greateste0
Value
64%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Halosulfuron POST to watermelon caused the greatest injury (Tri-X-313 = 64%, Precious Petite = 67%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–868 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

POST halosulfuron caused the greatest Precious Petite injury, 67%.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Material
Precious Petitee0
Treatment
Halosulfuron POSTe0
Outcome
injurye0
Direction
greateste0
Value
67%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Halosulfuron POST to watermelon caused the greatest injury (Tri-X-313 = 64%, Precious Petite = 67%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–868 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Directing halosulfuron to 25 or 50% of watermelon plants caused less injury than POST application.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
Halosulfuron directed to 25 or 50% (distal or proximal) of the plante0
Outcome
injurye0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
halosulfuron applied POSTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Halosulfuron directed to 25 or 50% (distal or proximal) of the plant caused less injury than halosulfuron applied POST.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–988 · show in text ↑
t0

“watermelon”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 77–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proximal stem application caused the greatest stem splitting.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
halosulfuron was applied to the proximal area of the steme0
Outcome
Stem splittinge0
Direction
greateste0
Comparator
POST-directed distal or POSTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stem splitting was greatest when halosulfuron was applied to the proximal area of the stem compared with POST-directed distal or POST.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1123 · show in text ↑
t0

“watermelon”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 77–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Distal stem application caused the greatest internode shortening.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
halosulfuron was applied to the distal region of the steme0
Outcome
Internode shorteninge0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Internode shortening was greatest in treatments where halosulfuron was applied to the distal region of the stem.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1236 · show in text ↑
t0

“watermelon”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 77–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Clinton, Tri-X-313 given POST-directed 25% distal treatment had total and marketable fruit weight similar to untreated controls.

Material
Tri-X-313e0
Treatment
POST-directed 25% distal treatmente0
Outcome
total and marketable fruit weighte0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
nontreated controle0
Setting
Clintone0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Tri-X-313 in the POST-directed 25% distal treatment produced similar total and marketable fruit weight as the nontreated control at Clinton.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1246–1386 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit number did not differ among treatments for either watermelon cultivar.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Outcome
Fruit numbere0
Direction
did not differe0
Comparator
among treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit number did not differ among treatments for either cultivar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1387–1452 · show in text ↑
t0

“watermelon”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 77–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Kinston, untreated Precious Petite had greater marketable fruit weight than 50% proximal and POST treatments.

Material
Precious Petitee0
Treatment
POST-directed 50% proximal and POST treatmentse0
Outcome
marketable fruit weighte0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
nontreated controle0
Setting
Kinstone0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“At Kinston, Precious Petite nontreated control and POST-directed 25% distal end treatment had greater marketable fruit weight than the POST-directed 50% proximal and POST treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1453–1635 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Kinston, Precious Petite given 25% distal treatment had greater marketable fruit weight than 50% proximal and POST treatments.

Material
Precious Petitee0
Treatment
POST-directed 25% distal end treatmente0
Outcome
marketable fruit weighte0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
POST-directed 50% proximal and POST treatmentse0
Setting
Kinstone0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“At Kinston, Precious Petite nontreated control and POST-directed 25% distal end treatment had greater marketable fruit weight than the POST-directed 50% proximal and POST treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1453–1635 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend limiting halosulfuron contact to no more than 25% of watermelon plants to improve tolerance.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Treatment
halosulfurone0
Outcome
crop tolerancee0
Direction
improvee0
Qualifier
no more than 25%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Limiting halosulfuron contact to no more than 25% of the watermelon plant will likely improve crop tolerance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1719–1828 · show in text ↑

Halosulfuron-methyl · crop injury · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.