Paper · 1986 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

INEXPENSIVE NO-TILL ATTACHMENT FOR A TWO-ROW CORN PLANTER

R. P. WHITE; J. A. IVANY; J. R. ENMAN

3
claims
3
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A steel frame supporting two fluted coulters, and mounted between a tractor and a two-row corn planter, successfully planted no-till corn (Zea mays L.) in cereal and corn stubble. No significant differences occurred in corn yield or maturity between the no-till and regularly tilled corn in three years. Construction details are presented.Key words: No-till corn, corn planter modifications, stubble planting

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The modified planter successfully planted no-till corn in cereal and corn stubble.

Outcome
successfully planted no-till corne0
Value
two fluted coulterse0
Setting
cereal and corn stubblee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A steel frame supporting two fluted coulters, and mounted between a tractor and a two-row corn planter, successfully planted no-till corn (Zea mays L.) in cereal and corn stubble”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–178 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn yield did not differ significantly between no-till and regularly tilled plots over three years.

Treatment
no-tille0
Outcome
corn yielde0
Qualifier
three yearse0
Comparator
regularly tilled corne0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No significant differences occurred in corn yield or maturity between the no-till and regularly tilled corn in three years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–302 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn maturity did not differ significantly between no-till and regularly tilled plots over three years.

Treatment
no-tille0
Outcome
maturitye0
Qualifier
three yearse0
Comparator
regularly tilled corne0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No significant differences occurred in corn yield or maturity between the no-till and regularly tilled corn in three years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–302 · show in text ↑

tillage · phenology · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 5 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

286 papers in the same direction as this paper · 812 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.