Paper · 2015 · New Phytologist

Arabidopsis EF‐Tu receptor enhances bacterial disease resistance in transgenic wheat

Henk‐jan Schoonbeek; Hsi‐Hua Wang; Francesca L. Stefanato; et al.

4
claims
4
verbatim quotes
178
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Perception of pathogen (or microbe)-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs/MAMPs) by pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) is a key component of plant innate immunity. The Arabidopsis PRR EF-Tu receptor (EFR) recognizes the bacterial PAMP elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) and its derived peptide elf18. Previous work revealed that transgenic expression of AtEFR in Solanaceae confers elf18 responsiveness and broad-spectrum bacterial disease resistance. In this study, we developed a set of bioassays to study the activation of PAMP-triggered immunity (PTI) in wheat. We generated transgenic wheat (Triticum aestivum) plants expressing AtEFR driven by the constitutive rice actin promoter and tested their response to elf18. We show that transgenic expression of AtEFR in wheat confers recognition of elf18, as measured by the induction of immune marker genes and callose deposition. When challenged with the cereal bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. oryzae, transgenic EFR wheat lines had reduced lesion size and bacterial multiplication. These results demonstrate that AtEFR can be transferred successfully from dicot to monocot species, further revealing that immune signalling pathways are conserved across these distant phyla. As novel PRRs are identified, their transfer between plant families represents a useful strategy for enhancing resistance to pathogens in crops.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AtEFR expression in wheat enabled elf18 recognition, indicated by immune marker gene induction.

Treatment
transgenic expression of AtEFRe0
Gene
AtEFRe0
Outcome
induction of immune marker genese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“transgenic expression of AtEFR in wheat confers recognition of elf18, as measured by the induction of immune marker genes and callose deposition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–875 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AtEFR expression in wheat enabled elf18 recognition, indicated by callose deposition.

Treatment
transgenic expression of AtEFRe0
Gene
AtEFRe0
Outcome
callose depositione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“transgenic expression of AtEFR in wheat confers recognition of elf18, as measured by the induction of immune marker genes and callose deposition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–875 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EFR wheat lines had smaller lesions after Pseudomonas syringae pv. oryzae challenge.

Material
transgenic EFR wheat linese0
Treatment
challenged with the cereal bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. oryzaee0
Interactor
Pseudomonas syringae pv. oryzaePseudomonas coronafaciens pv. oryzaee0pathogen
Outcome
lesion sizee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When challenged with the cereal bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. oryzae, transgenic EFR wheat lines had reduced lesion size and bacterial multiplication”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–1040 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EFR wheat lines had reduced bacterial multiplication after Pseudomonas syringae pv. oryzae challenge.

Material
transgenic EFR wheat linese0
Treatment
challenged with the cereal bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. oryzaee0
Interactor
Pseudomonas syringae pv. oryzaePseudomonas coronafaciens pv. oryzaee0pathogen
Outcome
bacterial multiplicatione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When challenged with the cereal bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. oryzae, transgenic EFR wheat lines had reduced lesion size and bacterial multiplication”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–1040 · show in text ↑

transgenic · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 7 positive, 5 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

infection · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 12 positive, 16 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

transgenic · molecular: expression · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.