Paper · 1997 · Plant Disease

Effect of Previous Crop, Seedborne Inoculum, and Fungicides on Development of Stagonospora Blotch

E. A. Milus; D. B. Chalkley

12
claims
25
verbatim quotes
47
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Stagonospora blotch of wheat has been difficult to control in the eastern United States. The objectives of this research were to evaluate the effects of field inoculum, seedborne inoculum, and seed treatment and foliar fungicides on Stagonospora blotch development and to develop more effective management strategies. In 1995 and 1996, similar experiments were established in "infested" and "clean" fields using two seed lots of Coker 9543 ("low" and "high" levels of seed infection) and six seed or foliar fungicide treatments. Planting in clean fields, planting seed with a low level of seedborne inoculum, treating seed with difenoconazole or triadimenol + thiram, and applying propiconazole or tebuconazole to the foliage all contributed toward reducing leaf infections by Stagonospora nodorum, severity of leaf and glume blotch, and incidence of S. nodorum in the harvested seed. Propiconazole alone was the least effective treatment. Planting in an infested field tended to negate the beneficial effects of low level of seed infection and fungicide seed treatments. Crop rotations and tillage that allow wheat debris to decompose before the next wheat crop along with difenoconazole or triadimenol seed treatment to reduce seedborne inoculum should be sufficient to avoid serious losses. In fields where wheat is grown every year, tillage and seed treatment would still be helpful, but a foliar fungicide at GS 8 may be necessary for adequate control. Applying an effective fungicide to seed appears to be a more efficient means of reducing seedborne inoculum than does producing seed with low levels of inoculum.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting in clean fields reduced leaf infections by Stagonospora nodorum, leaf and glume blotch severity and seedborne incidence in wheat.

Treatment
Planting in clean fieldse2
Interactor
Stagonospora nodorumParastagonospora nodorume2pathogen
Outcome
leaf infectionse2
Direction
reducinge2
Qualifier
severity of leaf and glume blotch, and incidence of S. nodorum in the harvested seede2
Comparator
infestede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Parastagonospora nodorum
Parastagonospora nodorum · InteractorM. Fernandez-Gamarra, L. Talavera-Stefani, Y. Mongelos-Franco, C. Burgos-Cantoni, A. Sanabria-Velazquez, G. Caballero-Mairesse, P. Chavez, M. Vargas, R. Scholz, · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stagonospora blotch of wheat has been difficult to control in the eastern United States”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–87 · show in text ↑
e3

“similar experiments were established in "infested" and "clean" fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–405 · show in text ↑
e2

“Planting in clean fields, planting seed with a low level of seedborne inoculum, treating seed with difenoconazole or triadimenol + thiram, and applying propiconazole or tebuconazole to the foliage all contributed toward reducing leaf infections by Stagonospora nodorum, severity of leaf and glume blotch, and incidence of S. nodorum in the harvested seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–883 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting seed with a low level of seedborne inoculum reduced leaf infections by Stagonospora nodorum in wheat relative to high seed infection.

Treatment
planting seed with a low level of seedborne inoculume2
Interactor
Stagonospora nodorumParastagonospora nodorume2pathogen
Outcome
leaf infectionse2
Direction
reducinge2
Qualifier
severity of leaf and glume blotch, and incidence of S. nodorum in the harvested seede2
Comparator
highe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Parastagonospora nodorum
Parastagonospora nodorum · InteractorM. Fernandez-Gamarra, L. Talavera-Stefani, Y. Mongelos-Franco, C. Burgos-Cantoni, A. Sanabria-Velazquez, G. Caballero-Mairesse, P. Chavez, M. Vargas, R. Scholz, · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stagonospora blotch of wheat has been difficult to control in the eastern United States”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–87 · show in text ↑
e4

“"low" and "high" levels of seed infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–482 · show in text ↑
e2

“Planting in clean fields, planting seed with a low level of seedborne inoculum, treating seed with difenoconazole or triadimenol + thiram, and applying propiconazole or tebuconazole to the foliage all contributed toward reducing leaf infections by Stagonospora nodorum, severity of leaf and glume blotch, and incidence of S. nodorum in the harvested seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–883 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Difenoconazole seed treatment reduced leaf infections by Stagonospora nodorum in wheat.

Treatment
difenoconazolee2
Interactor
Stagonospora nodorumParastagonospora nodorume2pathogen
Outcome
leaf infectionse2
Direction
reducinge2
Qualifier
severity of leaf and glume blotch, and incidence of S. nodorum in the harvested seede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Parastagonospora nodorum
Parastagonospora nodorum · InteractorM. Fernandez-Gamarra, L. Talavera-Stefani, Y. Mongelos-Franco, C. Burgos-Cantoni, A. Sanabria-Velazquez, G. Caballero-Mairesse, P. Chavez, M. Vargas, R. Scholz, · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stagonospora blotch of wheat has been difficult to control in the eastern United States”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–87 · show in text ↑
e2

“Planting in clean fields, planting seed with a low level of seedborne inoculum, treating seed with difenoconazole or triadimenol + thiram, and applying propiconazole or tebuconazole to the foliage all contributed toward reducing leaf infections by Stagonospora nodorum, severity of leaf and glume blotch, and incidence of S. nodorum in the harvested seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–883 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Triadimenol + thiram seed treatment reduced leaf infections by Stagonospora nodorum in wheat.

Treatment
triadimenol + thirame2
Interactor
Stagonospora nodorumParastagonospora nodorume2pathogen
Outcome
leaf infectionse2
Direction
reducinge2
Qualifier
severity of leaf and glume blotch, and incidence of S. nodorum in the harvested seede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Parastagonospora nodorum
Parastagonospora nodorum · InteractorM. Fernandez-Gamarra, L. Talavera-Stefani, Y. Mongelos-Franco, C. Burgos-Cantoni, A. Sanabria-Velazquez, G. Caballero-Mairesse, P. Chavez, M. Vargas, R. Scholz, · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stagonospora blotch of wheat has been difficult to control in the eastern United States”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–87 · show in text ↑
e2

“Planting in clean fields, planting seed with a low level of seedborne inoculum, treating seed with difenoconazole or triadimenol + thiram, and applying propiconazole or tebuconazole to the foliage all contributed toward reducing leaf infections by Stagonospora nodorum, severity of leaf and glume blotch, and incidence of S. nodorum in the harvested seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–883 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar propiconazole reduced leaf infections by Stagonospora nodorum in wheat.

Treatment
propiconazolee2
Interactor
Stagonospora nodorumParastagonospora nodorume2pathogen
Outcome
leaf infectionse2
Direction
reducinge2
Qualifier
severity of leaf and glume blotch, and incidence of S. nodorum in the harvested seede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Parastagonospora nodorum
Parastagonospora nodorum · InteractorM. Fernandez-Gamarra, L. Talavera-Stefani, Y. Mongelos-Franco, C. Burgos-Cantoni, A. Sanabria-Velazquez, G. Caballero-Mairesse, P. Chavez, M. Vargas, R. Scholz, · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stagonospora blotch of wheat has been difficult to control in the eastern United States”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–87 · show in text ↑
e2

“Planting in clean fields, planting seed with a low level of seedborne inoculum, treating seed with difenoconazole or triadimenol + thiram, and applying propiconazole or tebuconazole to the foliage all contributed toward reducing leaf infections by Stagonospora nodorum, severity of leaf and glume blotch, and incidence of S. nodorum in the harvested seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–883 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar tebuconazole reduced leaf infections by Stagonospora nodorum in wheat.

Treatment
tebuconazolee2
Interactor
Stagonospora nodorumParastagonospora nodorume2pathogen
Outcome
leaf infectionse2
Direction
reducinge2
Qualifier
severity of leaf and glume blotch, and incidence of S. nodorum in the harvested seede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Parastagonospora nodorum
Parastagonospora nodorum · InteractorM. Fernandez-Gamarra, L. Talavera-Stefani, Y. Mongelos-Franco, C. Burgos-Cantoni, A. Sanabria-Velazquez, G. Caballero-Mairesse, P. Chavez, M. Vargas, R. Scholz, · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stagonospora blotch of wheat has been difficult to control in the eastern United States”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–87 · show in text ↑
e2

“Planting in clean fields, planting seed with a low level of seedborne inoculum, treating seed with difenoconazole or triadimenol + thiram, and applying propiconazole or tebuconazole to the foliage all contributed toward reducing leaf infections by Stagonospora nodorum, severity of leaf and glume blotch, and incidence of S. nodorum in the harvested seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–883 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Propiconazole alone was the least effective treatment against Stagonospora blotch in wheat.

Treatment
Propiconazole alonee5
Outcome
least effective treatmente5
Direction
least effectivee5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stagonospora blotch of wheat has been difficult to control in the eastern United States”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–87 · show in text ↑
e5

“Propiconazole alone was the least effective treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–938 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting in an infested field tended to negate the beneficial effects of low seed infection and fungicide seed treatments on wheat.

Treatment
Planting in an infested fielde6
Outcome
beneficial effects of low level of seed infection and fungicide seed treatmentse6
Direction
negatee6
Comparator
cleane3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stagonospora blotch of wheat has been difficult to control in the eastern United States”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–87 · show in text ↑
e3

“similar experiments were established in "infested" and "clean" fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–405 · show in text ↑
e6

“Planting in an infested field tended to negate the beneficial effects of low level of seed infection and fungicide seed treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1070 · show in text ↑
Recommendationhypothesisoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Crop rotation and tillage with difenoconazole or triadimenol seed treatment should be sufficient to avoid serious losses in wheat.

Treatment
Crop rotations and tillagee7
Outcome
avoid serious lossese7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stagonospora blotch of wheat has been difficult to control in the eastern United States”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–87 · show in text ↑
e7

“Crop rotations and tillage that allow wheat debris to decompose before the next wheat crop along with difenoconazole or triadimenol seed treatment to reduce seedborne inoculum should be sufficient to avoid serious losses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1292 · show in text ↑
Recommendationhypothesisoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

In wheat grown every year, tillage and seed treatment would still be helpful.

Treatment
tillage and seed treatmente1
Outcome
helpfule1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In fields where wheat is grown every year, tillage and seed treatment would still be helpful, but a foliar fungicide at GS 8 may be necessary for adequate control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1294–1456 · show in text ↑
Recommendationhypothesisoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

In wheat grown every year, a foliar fungicide at GS 8 may be necessary for adequate control.

Treatment
foliar fungicide at GS 8e1
Outcome
adequate controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In fields where wheat is grown every year, tillage and seed treatment would still be helpful, but a foliar fungicide at GS 8 may be necessary for adequate control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1294–1456 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying an effective fungicide to seed appears to be a more efficient means of reducing seedborne inoculum than producing seed with low inoculum levels.

Treatment
Applying an effective fungicide to seede1
Outcome
reducing seedborne inoculume1
Direction
more efficiente1
Comparator
producing seed with low levels of inoculume1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stagonospora blotch of wheat has been difficult to control in the eastern United States”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“Applying an effective fungicide to seed appears to be a more efficient means of reducing seedborne inoculum than does producing seed with low levels of inoculum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1458–1618 · show in text ↑

difenoconazole · Parastagonospora nodorum · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

propiconazole · Parastagonospora nodorum · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · Parastagonospora nodorum · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 5 positive, 6 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

infection · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 12 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.