Paper · 1999 · Journal of Food Quality

QUALITY OF ‘BOSC’ PEARS AS INFLUENCED BY ELEVATED CARBON DIOXIDE STORAGE

S.R. DRAKE

5
claims
5
verbatim quotes
4
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT ‘Bosc’pears (Pyrus communis L.) were placed in a purge‐type controlled–atmosphere (CA) storage immediately after harvest (>24 h) and held for 180 days at 1C. Oxygen in all atmospheres was 1.5% and CO 2 was 1%, 3% or 5%. Pears were evaluated immediately after removal from CA storage and after ripening for an additional 7 days at 21 C. Pears stored in 3% CO 2 were firmer, had a superior finish, with significantly reduced decay and internal breakdown than pears stored in 1% CO 2 . In 3% CO 2 , pears retained the ability to ripen after long‐term storage. A 10 day delay in atmosphere establishment had little or no influence on the long‐term keeping quality or ripening ability of ‘Bosc’pears. Firmness, soluble solids content and starch either alone or together were good indices of maturity for ‘Bosc’ pears.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pears stored in 3% CO2 had significantly reduced decay and internal breakdown compared with 1% CO2.

Taxon
PearsPyruse1
Treatment
3% CO 2e1
Outcome
decay and internal breakdowne1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
1% CO 2e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus
Pyrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)JLPC · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Pears stored in 3% CO 2 were firmer, had a superior finish, with significantly reduced decay and internal breakdown than pears stored in 1% CO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 345–489 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pears stored in 3% CO2 were firmer and had a superior finish than pears stored in 1% CO2.

Taxon
PearsPyruse1
Treatment
3% CO 2e1
Outcome
superior finishe1
Direction
firmere1
Comparator
1% CO 2e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus
Pyrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)JLPC · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Pears stored in 3% CO 2 were firmer, had a superior finish, with significantly reduced decay and internal breakdown than pears stored in 1% CO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 345–489 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 3% CO2, pears retained the ability to ripen after long-term storage.

Taxon
pearsPyruse2
Treatment
3% CO 2e2
Outcome
ability to ripene2
Direction
retainede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus
Pyrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)JLPC · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“In 3% CO 2 , pears retained the ability to ripen after long‐term storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–564 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 10 day delay in atmosphere establishment had little or no influence on long-term keeping quality or ripening ability.

Taxon
pearsPyruse3
Treatment
10 day delay in atmosphere establishmente3
Outcome
keeping quality or ripening abilitye3
Direction
little or no influencee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus
Pyrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)JLPC · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“A 10 day delay in atmosphere establishment had little or no influence on the long‐term keeping quality or ripening ability of ‘Bosc’pears”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–703 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Firmness, soluble solids content and starch were good indices of maturity for Bosc pears, alone or together.

Taxon
pearsPyruse4
Outcome
indices of maturitye4
Direction
good indicese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus
Pyrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)JLPC · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Firmness, soluble solids content and starch either alone or together were good indices of maturity for ‘Bosc’ pears”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–820 · show in text ↑

co2 · disease · Pyrus (pears)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.