Paper · 2015 · Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia

Influence of CO2 and C2H4 Adsorbents to the Symptoms of Internal Browning on the Packaged ‘Silver Bell’ Pear (Pyrus communis L.)

Bayu Nugraha; Nursigit Bintoro; Hideki Murayama

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
19
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

After harvesting, pears undergo numerous biochemical processes and frequently fail to reach acceptable quality. The uses of packaging and ethylene (C2H4) absorber are regarded as well-known ways to solve that problem. However, accumulated CO2 in the package can promote the symptoms of internal browning on pear flesh also exacerbated by too low O2 concentrations. To inhibit the symptoms in ‘Silver Bell’ pear for a long period, we utilized CO2 adsorbent, CO2 adsorbent plus C2H4 adsorbent, and without both adsorbents in a bag to investigate their effects on internal browning development for 7 months in cold-storage. We found both adsorbents successfully reduced CO2 and C2H4 levels even though the incidences were visually found at 3 months of storage. Most severe internal browning was observed on CO2 adsorbent-untreated pears under high CO2 levels (7-9%) increasing since the beginning of storage. Therefore, there were no significant differences on the color and flesh firmness among the treatments, except controls, during cold-storage. Internal browning-affected pears showed harder flesh, greener and darker color compared with unaffected pears. Interestingly, control samples also suffered internal browning under low CO2 (̴ 0.1%) and high O2 (̴ 20.5%) concentrations after 5 months in storage with medium damage levels. We conclude that the uses of CO2 and C2H4 adsorbents successfully lowered CO2 and C2H4 levels in the bags during cold storage, but the both failed to prevent an internal browning development because too long storage period eventually caused internal browning.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The adsorbents reduced CO2 and C2H4 levels in bags.

Taxon
‘Silver Bell’ Peart0
Treatment
both adsorbentse0
Outcome
CO2 and C2H4 levelse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“‘Silver Bell’ Pear (Pyrus communis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–128 · show in text ↑
e0

“both adsorbents successfully reduced CO2 and C2H4 levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–686 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Internal browning appeared after three months of storage despite adsorbents.

Taxon
‘Silver Bell’ Peart0
Outcome
incidencese0
Qualifier
3 months of storagee0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“‘Silver Bell’ Pear (Pyrus communis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–128 · show in text ↑
e0

“the incidences were visually found at 3 months of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–756 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The most severe internal browning occurred in pears without CO2 adsorbent under 7–9% CO2.

Taxon
pearsPyruse0
Treatment
CO2 adsorbent-untreatede0
Outcome
internal browninge0
Direction
Most severee0
Value
7-9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus
Pyrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)JLPC · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“‘Silver Bell’ Pear (Pyrus communis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–128 · show in text ↑
e0

“Most severe internal browning was observed on CO2 adsorbent-untreated pears under high CO2 levels (7-9%) increasing since the beginning of storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–905 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Color and flesh firmness did not differ significantly among noncontrol treatments.

Taxon
‘Silver Bell’ Peart0
Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
color and flesh firmnesse0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Comparator
controlse0
Setting
cold-storagee0

Verbatim

t0

“‘Silver Bell’ Pear (Pyrus communis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–128 · show in text ↑
e0

“there were no significant differences on the color and flesh firmness among the treatments, except controls, during cold-storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–1046 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Browning affected pears had harder flesh than unaffected pears.

Taxon
‘Silver Bell’ Peart0
Outcome
fleshe0
Direction
hardere0
Comparator
unaffected pearse0

Verbatim

t0

“‘Silver Bell’ Pear (Pyrus communis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–128 · show in text ↑
e0

“Internal browning-affected pears showed harder flesh, greener and darker color compared with unaffected pears.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1157 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Browning affected pears had greener and darker color than unaffected pears.

Taxon
‘Silver Bell’ Peart0
Outcome
colore0
Direction
greener and darkere0
Comparator
unaffected pearse0

Verbatim

t0

“‘Silver Bell’ Pear (Pyrus communis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–128 · show in text ↑
e0

“Internal browning-affected pears showed harder flesh, greener and darker color compared with unaffected pears.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1157 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control pears developed medium internal browning after five months at low CO2 and high O2.

Taxon
‘Silver Bell’ Peart0
Outcome
internal browninge0
Qualifier
after 5 months in storage with medium damage levelse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“‘Silver Bell’ Pear (Pyrus communis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–128 · show in text ↑
e0

“control samples also suffered internal browning under low CO2 (̴ 0.1%) and high O2 (̴ 20.5%) concentrations after 5 months in storage with medium damage levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1333 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that both adsorbents failed to prevent internal browning during long storage.

Taxon
‘Silver Bell’ Peart0
Treatment
the bothe0
Outcome
internal browning developmente0
Direction
failed to prevente0
Qualifier
too long storage periode0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“‘Silver Bell’ Pear (Pyrus communis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–128 · show in text ↑
e0

“the both failed to prevent an internal browning development because too long storage period eventually caused internal browning.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1465–1593 · show in text ↑

co2 · disease · Pyrus (pears)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.