Paper · 2014 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

EFFECT OF PLANT GROWTH PROMOTING RHIZOBACTERIA ON GROWTH, NUTRIENT, ORGANIC ACID, AMINO ACID AND HORMONE CONTENT OF CAULIFLOWER (Brassica oleracea L. var. botrytis) TRANSPLANTS

Melek Ekinci; Metin Turan; Ertan Yıldırım; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
66
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the effect of different plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) strains on growth and quality of cauliflower transplants under greenhouse conditions. The strains of Bacillus megaterium TV-3D, B. megaterium TV-91C, Pantoea agglomerans RK-92, B. subtilis TV-17C, B. megaterium TV-87A, B. megaterium KBA-10 were used in this study. The results of this study showed that different bacterial inoculations increased plant growth parameters such as fresh shoot weight, dry shoot weight, root diameter, root length, fresh root weight, dry root weight, plant height, stem diameter, leaf area and chlorophyll contents of cauliflower transplant respectively. Except for abscisic acid (ABA), the values of gibberellic acid (GA), salicylic acid (SA), indole acetic acid (IAA) was increased by ratio of 23.64, 89.54 and 25.63%, respectively in compared to the control by application of B. megaterium KBA-10 and P. agglomerans RK-92. The amount of organic acids with B. subtilis TV-17C PGPR applications have increased at a ranging ratio from 9.63 to 186.02%. Also, PGPR inoculations increased the macro and micro nutrient content of cauliflower transplants. As a result, the use of bacteria treatments may provide a means of improving transplant growth and quality in cauliflower.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculations increased cauliflower transplant shoot and root growth traits.

Treatment
different bacterial inoculationse0
Interactor
bacteriale0symbiont
Outcome
fresh shoot weight, dry shoot weight, root diametere0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CAULIFLOWER (Brassica oleracea L. var. botrytis) TRANSPLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–176 · show in text ↑
e0

“different bacterial inoculations increased plant growth parameters such as fresh shoot weight, dry shoot weight, root diameter, root length, fresh root weight, dry root weight, plant height, stem diameter, leaf area and chlorophyll contents of cauliflower transplant respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–689 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculations increased cauliflower transplant root length and weights.

Treatment
different bacterial inoculationse0
Outcome
root length, fresh root weight, dry root weighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CAULIFLOWER (Brassica oleracea L. var. botrytis) TRANSPLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–176 · show in text ↑
e0

“different bacterial inoculations increased plant growth parameters such as fresh shoot weight, dry shoot weight, root diameter, root length, fresh root weight, dry root weight, plant height, stem diameter, leaf area and chlorophyll contents of cauliflower transplant respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–689 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculations increased height, stem diameter and leaf area of cauliflower transplants.

Treatment
different bacterial inoculationse0
Outcome
plant height, stem diameter, leaf areae0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CAULIFLOWER (Brassica oleracea L. var. botrytis) TRANSPLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–176 · show in text ↑
e0

“different bacterial inoculations increased plant growth parameters such as fresh shoot weight, dry shoot weight, root diameter, root length, fresh root weight, dry root weight, plant height, stem diameter, leaf area and chlorophyll contents of cauliflower transplant respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–689 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculations increased chlorophyll contents of cauliflower transplants.

Treatment
different bacterial inoculationse0
Outcome
chlorophyll contentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CAULIFLOWER (Brassica oleracea L. var. botrytis) TRANSPLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–176 · show in text ↑
e0

“different bacterial inoculations increased plant growth parameters such as fresh shoot weight, dry shoot weight, root diameter, root length, fresh root weight, dry root weight, plant height, stem diameter, leaf area and chlorophyll contents of cauliflower transplant respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–689 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial application increased gibberellic acid by 23.64% compared with the control.

Treatment
B. megaterium KBA-10 and P. agglomerans RK-92e0
Outcome
gibberellic acid (GA)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
23.64e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CAULIFLOWER (Brassica oleracea L. var. botrytis) TRANSPLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–176 · show in text ↑
e0

“the values of gibberellic acid (GA), salicylic acid (SA), indole acetic acid (IAA) was increased by ratio of 23.64, 89.54 and 25.63%, respectively in compared to the control by application of B. megaterium KBA-10 and P. agglomerans RK-92.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–960 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial application increased salicylic acid by 89.54% compared with the control.

Treatment
B. megaterium KBA-10 and P. agglomerans RK-92e0
Outcome
salicylic acid (SA)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
89.54e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CAULIFLOWER (Brassica oleracea L. var. botrytis) TRANSPLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–176 · show in text ↑
e0

“the values of gibberellic acid (GA), salicylic acid (SA), indole acetic acid (IAA) was increased by ratio of 23.64, 89.54 and 25.63%, respectively in compared to the control by application of B. megaterium KBA-10 and P. agglomerans RK-92.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–960 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial application increased indole acetic acid by 25.63% compared with the control.

Treatment
B. megaterium KBA-10 and P. agglomerans RK-92e0
Outcome
indole acetic acid (IAA)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
25.63%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CAULIFLOWER (Brassica oleracea L. var. botrytis) TRANSPLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–176 · show in text ↑
e0

“the values of gibberellic acid (GA), salicylic acid (SA), indole acetic acid (IAA) was increased by ratio of 23.64, 89.54 and 25.63%, respectively in compared to the control by application of B. megaterium KBA-10 and P. agglomerans RK-92.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–960 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. subtilis TV-17C application increased organic acids by 9.63 to 186.02%.

Treatment
B. subtilis TV-17C PGPR applicationse0
Interactor
B. subtilis TV-17CBacillus subtilise0symbiont
Outcome
amount of organic acidse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
9.63 to 186.02%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CAULIFLOWER (Brassica oleracea L. var. botrytis) TRANSPLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–176 · show in text ↑
e0

“The amount of organic acids with B. subtilis TV-17C PGPR applications have increased at a ranging ratio from 9.63 to 186.02%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1086 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR inoculations increased macro and micro nutrient content of cauliflower transplants.

Treatment
PGPR inoculationse0
Outcome
macro and micro nutrient contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PGPR inoculations increased the macro and micro nutrient content of cauliflower transplants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1185 · show in text ↑

Pantoea agglomerans · physiology: hormones · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Pantoea agglomerans · molecular: metabolites · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · physiology: pigments · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 21 positive, 1 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

inoculation · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

58 papers: 49 positive, 9 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

54 papers more in this group

See all 58 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.