Paper · 1994 · Physiologia Plantarum

Direct and indirect inhibition of single leaf respiration by elevated CO2 concentrations: Interaction with temperature

Lewis H. Ziska; James A. Bunce

6
claims
6
verbatim quotes
46
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Two herbaceous perennials, alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L. cv. Arc) and orchard grass ( Dactylus glomerata L. cv. Potomac), were grown at ambient (367 μmol mol −1 ) and elevated (729 μmol mol −1 ) CO 2 concentrations at constant temperatures of 15, 20, 25 and 30°C in order to examine direct and indirect changes in nighttime CO 2 efflux rate (respiration) of single leaves. Direct (biochemical) effects of CO 2 on nighttime respiration were determined for each growth condition by brief (<30 min) exposure to each CO 2 concentration. If no direct inhibition of respiration was observed, then long‐term reductions in CO 2 efflux between CO 2 treatments were presumed to be due to indirect inhibition, probably related to long‐term changes in leaf composition. By this criterion, indirect effects of CO 2 on leaf respiration were observed at 15 and 20°C for M. sativa on a weight basis, but not on a leaf area or protein basis. Direct effects however, were observed at 15, 20 and 25°C in D. glomerata ; therefore the observed reductions in respiration for leaves grown and measured at elevated relative to ambient CO 2 concentrations could not be distinguished as indirect inhibition. No inhibition of respiration at elevated CO 2 was observed at the highest growth temperature (30°C) in either species. CO 2 efflux increased with measurement and growth temperature for M. sativa at both CO 2 concentrations; however, CO 2 efflux in D. glomerata showed complete acclimation to growth temperature. Stimulation of leaf area and weight by elevated CO 2 levels declined with growth temperature in both species. Data from the present study suggest that both direct and indirect inhibition of respiration are possible with future increases in atmospheric CO 2 , and that the degree of each type of respiratory inhibition is a function of growth temperature.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 indirectly inhibited M. sativa respiration at 15 and 20°C on a weight basis.

Taxon
M. sativaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
CO 2e0
Outcome
leaf respiratione0
Direction
indirect effectse0
Qualifier
15 and 20°Ce0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“indirect effects of CO 2 on leaf respiration were observed at 15 and 20°C for M. sativa on a weight basis, but not on a leaf area or protein basis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–923 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct CO2 effects on D. glomerata respiration occurred at 15, 20, and 25°C.

Taxon
D. glomeratae0
Outcome
Direct effectse0
Qualifier
15, 20 and 25°Ce0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Direct effects however, were observed at 15, 20 and 25°C in D. glomerata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–996 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neither species showed respiratory inhibition at elevated CO2 and 30°C.

Treatment
elevated CO 2e0
Outcome
respiratione0
Direction
No inhibitione0
Qualifier
30°Ce0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“No inhibition of respiration at elevated CO 2 was observed at the highest growth temperature (30°C) in either species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1299 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M. sativa CO2 efflux increased with measurement and growth temperature.

Taxon
M. sativaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
measurement and growth temperaturee0
Outcome
CO 2 effluxe0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CO 2 efflux increased with measurement and growth temperature for M. sativa at both CO 2 concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1403 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

D. glomerata CO2 efflux acclimated completely to growth temperature.

Taxon
D. glomeratae0
Treatment
growth temperaturee0
Outcome
CO 2 effluxe0
Direction
complete acclimatione0

Verbatim

e0

“CO 2 efflux in D. glomerata showed complete acclimation to growth temperature.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1492 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 stimulation of leaf area and weight declined with growth temperature in both species.

Treatment
elevated CO 2 levelse0
Outcome
leaf area and weighte0
Direction
declinede0
Qualifier
growth temperaturee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Stimulation of leaf area and weight by elevated CO 2 levels declined with growth temperature in both species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1493–1602 · show in text ↑

co2 · growth · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 15 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.