Paper · 1993 · Physiologia Plantarum

Inhibition of whole plant respiration by elevated CO2 as modified by growth temperature

Lewis H. Ziska; James A. Bunce

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
59
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Plants of alfalfa ( Medicago sativa ) and orchard grass ( Dactylus glomerata ) were grown in controlled environment chambers at two CO 2 concentrations (350 and 700 μmol mol ‐1 ) and 4 constant day/night growth temperatures of 15, 20, 25 and 30°C for 50–90 days to determine changes in growth and whole plant CO 2 efflux (dark respiration). To facilitate comparisons with other studies, respiration data were expressed on the basis of leaf area, dry weight and protein. Growth at elevated CO 2 increased total plant biomass at all temperatures relative to ambient CO 2 , but the relative enhancement declined ( P ≤0.05) as temperature increased. Whole plant respiration (R d ) at elevated CO 2 declined at 15 and 20°C in D. glomerata on an area, weight or protein basis and in M. sativa on a weight or protein basis when compared to ambient CO 2 . Separation of R d into respiration required for growth (R g ) and maintenance (R m ) showed a significant effect of elevated CO 2 on both components. R m was reduced in both species but only at lower temperatures (15°C in M. sativa and 15 and 20°C in D. glomerata ). The effect on R m could not be accounted for by protein content in either species. R g was also reduced with elevated CO 2 ; however no particular effect of temperature was observed, i. e. R g was reduced at 20, 25 and 30°C in M. sativa and at 15 and 25°C in D. glomerata. For the two perennial species used in the present study, the data suggest that both R g and R m can be reduced by anticipated increases in atmospheric CO 2 ; however, CO 2 inhibition of total plant respiration may decline as a function of increasing temperature

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased biomass in both species at all temperatures.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
elevated CO 2e0
Outcome
total plant biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
all temperaturese0
Comparator
ambient CO 2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth at elevated CO 2 increased total plant biomass at all temperatures relative to ambient CO 2 , but the relative enhancement declined ( P ≤0.05) as temperature increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–645 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plants of alfalfa ( Medicago sativa )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–37 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The biomass enhancement under elevated CO2 declined significantly with increasing temperature.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
temperaturee0
Outcome
relative enhancemente0
Direction
declinede0
Value
P ≤0.05e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the relative enhancement declined ( P ≤0.05) as temperature increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–644 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plants of alfalfa ( Medicago sativa )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 reduced orchard grass whole-plant respiration at 15 and 20°C on area, weight, and protein bases.

Taxon
D. glomeratae0
Treatment
elevated CO 2e0
Outcome
Whole plant respiration (R d )e0
Direction
declinede0
Qualifier
15 and 20°Ce0
Comparator
ambient CO 2e0

Verbatim

e0

“Whole plant respiration (R d ) at elevated CO 2 declined at 15 and 20°C in D. glomerata on an area, weight or protein basis and in M. sativa on a weight or protein basis when compared to ambient CO 2 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–847 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 reduced alfalfa whole-plant respiration at 15 and 20°C on weight and protein bases.

Taxon
M. sativaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
elevated CO 2e0
Outcome
Whole plant respiration (R d )e0
Direction
declinede0
Qualifier
weight or protein basise0
Comparator
ambient CO 2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Whole plant respiration (R d ) at elevated CO 2 declined at 15 and 20°C in D. glomerata on an area, weight or protein basis and in M. sativa on a weight or protein basis when compared to ambient CO 2 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–847 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 significantly affected both growth and maintenance respiration.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
elevated CO 2e0
Outcome
respiration required for growth (R g ) and maintenance (R m )e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Separation of R d into respiration required for growth (R g ) and maintenance (R m ) showed a significant effect of elevated CO 2 on both components.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–997 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plants of alfalfa ( Medicago sativa )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein content did not account for the maintenance respiration response in either species.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Outcome
effect on R me0
Qualifier
could not be accounted for by protein contente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect on R m could not be accounted for by protein content in either species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1197 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plants of alfalfa ( Medicago sativa )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–37 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors interpreted elevated CO2 inhibition of total respiration as potentially declining with increasing temperature.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
increasing temperaturee0
Outcome
CO 2 inhibition of total plant respiratione0
Direction
declinee0
Qualifier
maye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CO 2 inhibition of total plant respiration may decline as a function of increasing temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1555–1649 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plants of alfalfa ( Medicago sativa )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–37 · show in text ↑

co2 · growth · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 15 positive, 5 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.