Paper · 2012 · The Journal of Microbiology

Biological control and plant growth promoting capacity of rhizobacteria on pepper under greenhouse and field conditions

Mi-Seon Hahm; Marilyn Sumayo; Ye-Ji Hwang; et al.

5
claims
16
verbatim quotes
77
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria Ochrobactrum lupini KUDC1013 and Novosphingobium pentaromativorans KUDC1065 isolated from Dokdo Island, S. Korea are capable of eliciting induced systemic resistance (ISR) in pepper against bacterial spot disease. The present study aimed to determine whether plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) strains including strain KUDC1013, strain KUDC1065, and Paenibacillus polymyxa E681 either singly or in combinations were evaluated to have the capacity for potential biological control and plant growth promotion effect in the field trials. Under greenhouse conditions, the induced systemic resistance (ISR) effect of treatment with strains KUDC1013 and KUDC1065 differed according to pepper growth stages. Drenching of 3-week-old pepper seedlings with the KUDC-1013 strain significantly reduced the disease symptoms. In contrast, treatment with the KUDC1065 strain significantly protected 5-week-old pepper seedlings. Under field conditions, peppers treated with PGPR mixtures containing E681 and KUDC1013, either in a two-way combination, were showed greater effect on plant growth than those treated with an individual treatment. Collectively, the application of mixtures of PGPR strains on pepper might be considered as a potential biological control under greenhouse and field conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The induced systemic resistance effect of KUDC1013 and KUDC1065 varied with pepper growth stage.

Taxon
peppert0
Treatment
strains KUDC1013 and KUDC1065e0
Outcome
induced systemic resistance (ISR) effecte0
Setting
greenhouse conditionse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Under greenhouse conditions, the induced systemic resistance (ISR) effect of treatment with strains KUDC1013 and KUDC1065 differed according to pepper growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–745 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under greenhouse conditions, the induced systemic resistance (ISR) effect of treatment with strains KUDC1013 and KUDC1065 differed according to pepper growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–745 · show in text ↑
t1

“Under greenhouse conditions, the induced systemic resistance (ISR) effect of treatment with strains KUDC1013 and KUDC1065 differed according to pepper growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–745 · show in text ↑
t0

“pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

KUDC-1013 drenching significantly reduced disease symptoms in three-week-old pepper seedlings.

Taxon
peppere0
Organ / stage
3-week-old pepper seedlingse0
Treatment
Drenching of 3-week-old pepper seedlings with the KUDC-1013 straine0
Interactor
KUDC-1013 straine0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease symptomse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Drenching of 3-week-old pepper seedlings with the KUDC-1013 strain significantly reduced the disease symptoms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–856 · show in text ↑
e1

“Drenching of 3-week-old pepper seedlings with the KUDC-1013 strain significantly reduced the disease symptoms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–856 · show in text ↑
t1

“Drenching of 3-week-old pepper seedlings with the KUDC-1013 strain significantly reduced the disease symptoms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–856 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

KUDC1065 significantly protected five-week-old pepper seedlings.

Taxon
peppere0
Organ / stage
5-week-old pepper seedlingse0
Treatment
treatment with the KUDC1065 straine0
Interactor
KUDC1065 straine0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
protected 5-week-old pepper seedlingse0
Direction
protectede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“treatment with the KUDC1065 strain significantly protected 5-week-old pepper seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–957 · show in text ↑
e1

“treatment with the KUDC1065 strain significantly protected 5-week-old pepper seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–957 · show in text ↑
t1

“treatment with the KUDC1065 strain significantly protected 5-week-old pepper seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–957 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The E681 and KUDC1013 mixture improved pepper growth more than individual treatments in the field.

Taxon
peppersCapsicume0
Treatment
PGPR mixtures containing E681 and KUDC1013e0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
an individual treatmente0
Setting
field conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum
Capsicum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under field conditions, peppers treated with PGPR mixtures containing E681 and KUDC1013, either in a two-way combination, were showed greater effect on plant growth than those treated with an individual treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1171 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under field conditions, peppers treated with PGPR mixtures containing E681 and KUDC1013, either in a two-way combination, were showed greater effect on plant growth than those treated with an individual treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1171 · show in text ↑
t1

“Under field conditions, peppers treated with PGPR mixtures containing E681 and KUDC1013, either in a two-way combination, were showed greater effect on plant growth than those treated with an individual treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1171 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors consider PGPR mixtures a potential biological control treatment for pepper.

Taxon
peppere0
Treatment
application of mixtures of PGPR strainse0
Outcome
potential biological controle0
Setting
greenhouse and field conditionse0

Verbatim

e0

“the application of mixtures of PGPR strains on pepper might be considered as a potential biological control under greenhouse and field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1332 · show in text ↑
e1

“the application of mixtures of PGPR strains on pepper might be considered as a potential biological control under greenhouse and field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1332 · show in text ↑
t1

“the application of mixtures of PGPR strains on pepper might be considered as a potential biological control under greenhouse and field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1332 · show in text ↑

inoculation · growth · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

56 papers: 48 positive, 8 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.