Paper · 2010 · African Crop Science Journal

Effects of preharvest treatments on yield and chemical composition of tomato

M Meaza; T Seyoum; K Woldetsadik

6
claims
17
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Postharvest losses in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) are among others, the prime factor affecting the quantity and quality of tomato fruits in the market. Options to avert these losses are limited, and thus the need to design research studies that are geared to developing such strategies. A field experiment was therefore conducted to study effects of preharvest treatment of ComCat® spray, manure, NP fertilisation and the combinations of ComCat® with the two forms of fertilisation and the control on yield and quality of tomato in semiarid climate in eastern part of Ethiopia. The experiment was conducted using randomised complete block design with 3 replications. Data were collected from two centeral rows of treatment plots to assess vegetative growth, yield and the chemical composition of fruits at harvest. The result showed that the use of ComCat® and its combination with manure gave the highest total yield 58.53 tha-1 and 55.77tha-1 of which 94% and 93% weremarketable and total yield, respectively. By using manure and NP fertiliser it was observed that both marketable and total yield was not significantly influenced. The control tomato plants were found to give higher total and marketable yield on comparison with the preharvest ComCat® + NP treatment. The chemical qualities of tomatoes were improved by preharvest ComCat®, ComCat® + manure and ComCat® = NP treatments. Based on the varied performance of the treatements imposed, adoption of a particular teatment will depend on a specificrecommendation dormain.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ComCat spray gave the highest total yield of 58.53 t/ha among the preharvest treatments.

Treatment
use of ComCat®e1
Outcome
total yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
58.53 tha-1e1
Setting
semiarid climate in eastern part of Ethiopiae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of preharvest treatments on yield and chemical composition of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“in semiarid climate in eastern part of Ethiopia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–584 · show in text ↑
e1

“the use of ComCat® and its combination with manure gave the highest total yield 58.53 tha-1 and 55.77tha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–952 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ComCat combined with manure gave the highest total yield of 55.77 t/ha.

Treatment
its combination with manuree1
Outcome
total yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
55.77tha-1e1
Setting
semiarid climate in eastern part of Ethiopiae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of preharvest treatments on yield and chemical composition of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“in semiarid climate in eastern part of Ethiopia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–584 · show in text ↑
e1

“the use of ComCat® and its combination with manure gave the highest total yield 58.53 tha-1 and 55.77tha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–952 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure and NP fertiliser did not significantly influence marketable or total yield.

Treatment
manure and NP fertilisere2
Outcome
marketable and total yielde2
Direction
not significantly influencede2
Setting
semiarid climate in eastern part of Ethiopiae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of preharvest treatments on yield and chemical composition of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“in semiarid climate in eastern part of Ethiopia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–584 · show in text ↑
e2

“By using manure and NP fertiliser it was observed that both marketable and total yield was not significantly influenced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The control plants gave higher total and marketable yield than plants given the preharvest ComCat + NP treatment.

Treatment
control tomato plantse3
Outcome
total and marketable yielde3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
preharvest ComCat® + NP treatmente3
Setting
semiarid climate in eastern part of Ethiopiae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of preharvest treatments on yield and chemical composition of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“in semiarid climate in eastern part of Ethiopia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–584 · show in text ↑
e3

“The control tomato plants were found to give higher total and marketable yield on comparison with the preharvest ComCat® + NP treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1276 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preharvest ComCat, ComCat + manure and ComCat + NP treatments improved the chemical qualities of tomato fruit.

Treatment
preharvest ComCat®, ComCat® + manure and ComCat® = NP treatmentse4
Outcome
chemical qualitiese4
Direction
improvede4
Setting
semiarid climate in eastern part of Ethiopiae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of preharvest treatments on yield and chemical composition of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“in semiarid climate in eastern part of Ethiopia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–584 · show in text ↑
e4

“The chemical qualities of tomatoes were improved by preharvest ComCat®, ComCat® + manure and ComCat® = NP treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1394 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Adoption of a particular preharvest treatment will depend on a specific recommendation domain.

Outcome
adoption of a particular teatmente5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of preharvest treatments on yield and chemical composition of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–76 · show in text ↑
e5

“Based on the varied performance of the treatements imposed, adoption of a particular teatment will depend on a specificrecommendation dormain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1396–1537 · show in text ↑

nanoparticle · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 32 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

fertilization · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

111 papers: 90 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 90 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

107 papers more in this group

See all 111 papers →

fertilization · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

978 papers: 850 positive, 128 negative or no effect

849 papers in the same direction as this paper · 104 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

974 papers more in this group

See all 978 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.